Indirect research of weight of one repetation maximum in Bench Press technique

Bench Press tekniğinde bir tekrarda kaldırılan maksimum ağırlığın indirekt olarak araştırılması

Authors

  • İbrahim Ümran Akdağcık Nigde Uni. Dept. of Physical Education and Sport

    Keywords:

    Method of repetetion maximum, conjectural 1 repetetion maximum, Bench Press, regression, somatotype, Tekrarlı maksimum yöntemi, tahmini bir tekrarlı maksimum, regresyon, somatotip

    Abstract

    The objective of this research is to find the weight of 1 Repetation Maximum (1RM) in reality by using the method of 3, 6 and 10 Repetation Maximums. For this reason, the group of 45 men subjects engaged in sport actively  whose ages between (ort= 18±0.6396), height (ort= 174.37±4.44), weight (ort= 62.91±6.77) and somatotype values (1.43±0.14 / 4.7±1.33 / 3.5±0.90) were constituted. The regresion formulas for prediction of 1 Repetation Maximum was improved in bench press by using the method of 1, 3, 6 and 10 Repetation Maximums. Besides, it was not found statistical difference (p>0.01) between 1 Repetation Maximum found by regresion formulas (Conjectural 1 Repetetion Maximum) and 1 Repetation Maximum found in reality. More, the proportion of the weight of 3, 6 and 10  Repetation Maximums to 1 Repetation Maximum was calculated (3TM  %91.95,  6TM %83.37, 10TM %71.46). As a result, the regresion formula whose standard foult (sh= ±1.120) is minimum was found the formula of getting with the method of 3 Repetation Maximum (3RM).  Y = 1.619 + (1.062 * 3 RM)

     

    Özet

    Bu çalışmanın amacı 3, 6 ve 10 tekrarlı maksimum yöntemi kullanarak, gerçekte kaldırılabilecek bir tekrardaki maksimum ağırlığı bulmaktır. Bu amaçla yaşları 17-19 ( ort= 18±0.6396 ), boyları 165-183 cm ( ort= 174.37±4.44 ), kiloları 50-75 (ort= 62.91±6.77 ) ve somatotip değerleri (1.43±0.14 / 4.7±1.33 / 3.5±0.90) olan 45 sporla aktif uğraşan  erkek deneğin, bench press’teki 1,3, 6 ve 10 tekrarda kaldırılan maksimal ağırlıkları bulunarak, bir tekrarda kaldırılabilecek maksimal ağırlığı (1TM) tahmin etmek için regresyon formülleri geliştirilmiştir. Ayrıca deneklerin 3, 6 ve 10 tekrarda kaldırdıkları maksimal ağırlıklardan elde edilen tahmini 1TM  ile gerçekte kaldırılan 1TM arasında istatistiksel olarak  fark bulunamamıştır ( p> 0.01 ). Yine 3, 6 ve 10 tekrarda kaldırılan maksimal ağırlığın, bir tekrarda kaldırılan maksimal ağırlığa oranı da hesaplanmıştır (3TM  %91.95,  6TM %83.37, 10TM %71.46).  Sonuç olarak, standart hatası en düşük olan regresyon formülünün (sh = ±1.120) 3 tekrarda kaldırılan maksimal ağırlıklardan (3TM) elde edilen formül olduğu bulunmuştur. Y = 1.619 + (1.062 * 3TM).

    Downloads

    Download data is not yet available.

    Author Biography

    • İbrahim Ümran Akdağcık, Nigde Uni. Dept. of Physical Education and Sport

      Born in Ankara,Turkiye, 1975. Graduated from Hacettepe Univetsity, Sport Science and Technology in 1998. Master degree at the Nigde Uni., 2002. PhD at Gazi Uni., 2013

      Nigde Uni. P.E.S (physical education and sport)

      Dept. of Sport Management

      Dr.

    References

    Arıcı, H. (1997) İstatistik Yöntem ve Uygulama. Ankara: Meteksan Basımevi, 136-138

    Beachle, T.R., Groves, B.R. (1992) Weight Training : Step to Success. Campaining: Leisure Press. 55-57

    Bompa, T.O. (1990) Theory and Metodology of Training. Dubuque: Kendall / Hunt Pub. p. 373

    Brzycki, M. (1993). Strength testing - predicting a one-rep max from reps to fatigue. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance. 64: 88-90.

    Dündar, U. (2003) Antrenman Teorisi. Nobel Yay.Dağ. Ankara: 3-5, 145

    Hartmann, J., Tünemann, H. (1995) Fitness and Strength Training for All Sports. Sport Book Pub, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 12-14, 207

    Heath,B.H., Carter,J.E. (1967) A Modified Somatotype Method. Am.J.Phys.Atrop. 24: 87-99

    Kirsch, A. (1986). Sporda İnsan Sınırları. Çev: Ferman Konukman. ABTD. 17, 27-33

    Kreider,R.B.,Klesges,R.C.and etc. Effects of Nutritional Supplementation During Off-Season College Football Training on Body Composition and Strength .Journal of Exercise Physiology online. Vol 2,No 2,Apr 1999: 24-39

    Kumar, S. (1991). Arm Lift Strength in Work Space.Applied Ergonomics. 22 (5), 317-328

    Kumar, S. (1995). Development of Predictive Equations for Lifting Strength. Applied Ergonomics. 26 (5), 327-341

    LeSuer, D. A. et al. (1997). The Accuracy of Prediction Equations for Estimating 1RM Performance in The Bench Press, Squat and Deadlift. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 11(4), p 211-213

    Mayhew, J.L, Ball, T.E, Ward, T.E, Hart, C.L, Arnold, M.D. (1991). Relationship of Structural Dimensions to Bench Press Strength in College Males. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1991;31:135-141.

    Mayhew, J.L., Clemens, J.C. et al. (1995). Cross-Validation of Equation to Predict 1-RM Bench Press from Repetation-to-Failure. Medicine Science and Sport Exercise. 27, 209-218

    Mayhew, L. et al. (1995). Muscular Endurance Repetation to Predict Bench Press Strength in Men of Different Training Levels. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness. 35, p 108-113

    Ziyagil,M.A. (1991). Güreşçilerin Antropometrik Özellikleri, Biomotor Yetenekleri ve Başarıları Arasındaki İlişkilerin Araştırılması. Yayınlanmış Doktora Tezi. M.Ü.Sağ.Bil.Enst. B.E.S.A.D.

    Downloads

    Published

    19.02.2014

    Issue

    Section

    Sport Sciences and Physical Education

    How to Cite

    Akdağcık, İ. Ü. (2014). Indirect research of weight of one repetation maximum in Bench Press techniqueBench Press tekniğinde bir tekrarda kaldırılan maksimum ağırlığın indirekt olarak araştırılması. Journal of Human Sciences, 11(1), 177-191. https://j-humansciences.com/index.php/IJHS/article/view/2702