Interface problems of elementary students and parallel interface designs<p>İlköğretim öğrencilerinin arayüz problemleri ve paralel arayüz tasarımları

Authors

  • Mehmet Firat Anadolu University, Open Education Faculty, Department of Distance Education

Keywords:

Parallel Instruction Approach, parallel interface design, cognitive overload, split attention, disorientation, paralel öğretim yaklaşımı, paralel arayüz tasarımı, aşırı bilişsel yüklenme, dikkat bölünmesi, kaybolma

Abstract

Despite multiple window interfaces have eliminated some user-interface problems by showing information in independent windows, disorientation, cognitive overload and split attention keeping up to date as an important problems of e-learning interfaces. The aim of this study is to determine the effects of parallel interface designs on the e-learning success of primary school students. For this purpose, three different parallel interface designs were created with the same content for experimental design. Content was selected as 4 basic traffic signals. This study was designed as general survey models. Performances of the students were examined through the questions related to recall, attention, and difficulty level of media. 9 6th grade primary school students participated in the application. According to the results of the application students were fever forced and best recall in 2nd level parallel interface design. However, students were faster in 3th level parallel interface design. At the end of the research solutions to the problems of the learner-interface interaction is presented by help of parallel interface designs. Özet Çok pencereli arayüzler, öğrenenlerin karşılaştığı problemlerin bir kısmını çözmüş olsalar da karmaşıklık, sürekli doğrusal ilerleme, yolunu kaybetme, aşırı bilişsel yüklenme ve dikkat bölünmesi problemleri güncelliğini korumaktadır. Bu araştırmanın amacı eğitim yazılımlarında paralel arayüz tasarımlarının ilköğretim öğrencilerinin e-öğrenme başarılarına etkilerini belirlemektir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda aynı içeriğe sahip paralel üç farklı arayüz tasarımı oluşturulmuştur. İçerik olarak 4 temel trafik işareti seçilmiştir. Tarama modelinde desenlenen bu araştırma kapsamında öğrencilerin performansları için hatırlama, dikkat ve ortamın zorluk düzeyi sorgulanmıştır. Uygulama ilköğretim 6. sınıftan 9 öğrenciyle gerçekleştirilmiştir. Uygulama sonuçlarına göre öğrencilerin 2. paralellik düzeyinde daha az zorlandıkları ve verilen içeriği en iyi bu paralellik düzeyine sahip uygulamada hatırladıkları görülmüştür. Bununla birlikte öğrencilerin 3. düzey paralellikte daha hızlı oldukları görülmüştür. Araştırma sonunda paralel arayüz tasarımlarından yararlanılarak öğrenen-arayüz etkileşim problemlerine yönelik çeşitli öneriler sunulmuştur.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Mehmet Firat, Anadolu University, Open Education Faculty, Department of Distance Education

Dr. Mehmet FIRAT is research assistant in Department of Distance Education, Faculty of Open Education, Anadolu University. The researcher gained his Ph.D. education in educational technology. His academic interest areas are metaphors in educational technology, distance education, e-learning, cyber behaviors, hyper system navigations, navigation performance, educational hypermedia and use of internet in education.

References

Aires, P. and Sweller, J. (2005). The split attention principle in multimedia learning. Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. R. Mayer. United States of America.

Amadieu, F., van Gog, T., Paas, F. Tricot, A. & Marine, C. (2009). Effects of prior knowledge and concept-map structure on disorientation, cognitive load, and learning”. Learning and Instruction, 19, 376-386.

Aslan, F. (2006). Çoklu Ortam Tasarımında Paralellik Düzeyinin Öğrenme Süresi, Başarı ve Transfer Becerilerine Etkisi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.

Bieber, M. & Wan, J. (1994). Backtracking in a multiple window hypertext environment, in Proceedings of the Fifth ACM Conference on Hypermedia Technologies (ECHT’94), Edinburgh, September 1994, pp. 158–166.

Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (1992). The split-attention effect as a factor in the design of instruction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 233-246.

Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction”. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 293–332.

Chang, S.L. & Ley, K. (2006). A learning strategy to compensate for cognitive overload in online learning: Learner use of printed online materials. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 5(1), 104-117.

Conklin, J. (1987). Hypertext: An introduction and survey. IEEE Computer, 20(9), 1-41.

Daft, R.L. & Lengel, R.H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554-571.

Dias, P., Gomes, M. J. & Correia, A. P. (1999). Disorientation in hypermedia environments: Mechanisms to support navigation.” Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20, 93–117.

Doğan, H.T. (2007). Paralel Çoklu Ortamlarla Öğrenmede Öğrenme Stilinin Kaybolmaya Etkisi. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.

Fırat, M. (2009). Bireyselleştirilebilir Bir E-öğrenme Aracı Olarak Dijital Konu Haritaları. Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, 2(3), 27-32.

Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (1999). Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 351–371.

Karadeniz, Ş. (2006). Kaybolma açısından kullanışlı çoklu ortamların tasarlanması. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(2), 79-97.

Karasar, N. (2006). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi (16. Baskı), Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.

Kirschner, P.A. (2002). Cognitive load theory: implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning. Journal of Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 1-10.

Kirsh, D. (2000). A few thoughts on cognitive overload. Intellectica, 1(30), 19-51.

Kılıç Çakmak, E. (2007). Arayüz tasarımında yeni bir yaklaşım: Paralel öğretim tasarımı. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 27(1), 1-22.

Mayer, R. E. & Moreno, R. (1998). A split attention effect in multimedia learning: evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2). 312-320.

Mayer, R.E. & Anderson, R.B. (1991). Animations need narrations: an experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 484–490.

McDonald, S. ve Stevenson, R. J. (1996). Disorientation in hypertext: the effects of three text structures on navigation, Applied Ergonomicks, (1), 61-68.

Moreno, R. & Mayer, R. E. (2000). A coherence effect in multimedia learning: The case for minimizing irrelevant sounds in the design of multimedia instructional messages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 117-125.

Min, R., Yu, T., Spenkelink, G., & Vos, H. (2004). A comparison of parallelism in interface designs for computer-based learning environments. Journal of computer assisted learning, 20 (5), 360-367.

Min, R. (2010). Shortcomings of the Monitor. The Problem of Linear Presentation Media in Learning Situations; the Importance of Parallelism in Open Learning and Working Environments, http://projects.edte.utwente.nl/pi/Papers/Monitor.htm adresinden 15.08.2011 tarihinde erişilmiştir.

Min, R. (1992). Parallel Instruction, a theory for Educational Computer Simulation. Interactive Learning International, 8 (3), 177-183.

Min, R. (2011). Parallelism and the parallel instruction theory. http://projects.edte.utwente.nl/pi/home/Theory.htm adresinden 12.02.2011 tarihinde erişilmiştir.

Min, R. Yu, T. & Spenkelink, G. (2003). e-Learning environments on the world wide web, based on the Concept of Parallelism (empirical study with abstract and concrete tasks based on simulation experiences). Paper presented at the EARLI 2003 Conference, Padova, Italy.

Min, R., Yu, T., Spenkelink, G., & Vos, H. (2004). A comparison of parallelism in interface designs for computer-based learning environments. Journal of computer assisted learning, 20 (5), 360-367.

Mousavi, S., Low R. & Sweller, J. (1995). Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 319-334.

Najjar, L. J. (1998). Principles of educational multimedia user interface design. Human Factors, 40(2), 311-323.

Paas, F., Renkl, A. & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational psychologist, 38(1), 1–4.

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257–285.

Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer J.J.G. & Paas, F.G.W.C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychological Review, 10, 251–296.

Van Merrienboer, J. J. G. & Ayres, P. (2005). Research on cognitive load theory and its design implications for e-learning”. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 53(3), 5-13.

Yu, T. (2002). Empirical study to Cognitive Load and the PI theory with well-designed products for procedure skills and parallel instructions. Master Thesis, University of Twente. Enschede.

Downloads

Published

2013-10-10

How to Cite

Firat, M. (2013). Interface problems of elementary students and parallel interface designs&lt;p&gt;İlköğretim öğrencilerinin arayüz problemleri ve paralel arayüz tasarımları. Journal of Human Sciences, 10(2), 583–600. Retrieved from https://j-humansciences.com/ojs/index.php/IJHS/article/view/2448

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 2 (2013)

Section

Primary and Pre-School Education

License

Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi ISSN:1303-5134
International Journal of Human Sciences ISSN:2458-9489
 
is an "Open Access Journal" that uses a funding model that does not charge readers or their institutions for access. From the BOAI definition of open access, users take the right of read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles.

Authors can retain copyright, while granting the journal right of first publication. Alternatively, authors can transfer copyright to the journal, which then permits authors non-commercial use of the work, including the right to place it in an open access archive. In addition, Creative Commons can be consulted for flexible copyright licenses.

©1999 Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.