Turkish adaptation of the Shared Leadership Perception Scale
Keywords:
Shared leadership, validity, reliabilityAbstract
This research has been done to determine Turkish adaptation with its validity and reliability of the Shared Leadership Perception Scale 232 secondary school teachers working in province of Sakarya constitute the study group of the research. The research results are as follows: As a result of linguistic equivalance analysis of scale a high level of significant relation in a positive direction has been found out between the Turkish and English forms. It has been found out that Cronbach Alpha (α) coefficients calculated α= .91 in total, that they change between α=74 and α=88 in accordance with the dimensions, that total correlations of items are between.40-.73 and that the item points of the top - bottom groups of % 27 differ significantly for the reliability survey. It has been understood that the validity of the scale has also been verified due to the fact that the goodness - of - fit points of the scale are at the level desired also according to the confirmatory factor analysis results. All the validity and reliability analysis results carried out show that the Shared Leadership Perception Scale can be used as a valid and reliable assessment instrument in the studies where school employees in Turkey are going to be taken as sample.
Downloads
Metrics
References
References
Balcı, A. (1995). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma. Ankara: 72 TDFO Bilgisayar Yayın LTD.
Bayram, N. (2010). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş amos uygulamaları. İstanbul: Ezgi Kitabevi.
Beycioğlu, K. (2010). Kitap inceleme (Improving schools through teacher leadership). Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi/Educational Administration-Theory and Practice, 16( 2).
Bligh, M. C., Pearce, C. L. & Kohles, J.C. (2006). The importance of self- and shared leadership in team based knowledge work: A meso-level model of leadership dynamics. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21 (4), 296-318.
Buckmaster, S. (2004) Shared leadership: what is it, why is it important, and who wants it anyway? KA9 Overview Paper. Assessor: Dr. Linda Lewis.
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Cawthorne, J. E. (2010). Leading from the middle of the organization: An examination of shared leadership in academic libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36( 2), 151–157
Çokluk ,Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik SPSS ve Lisrel uygulamaları. Ankara: PEGEM Akademi.
Ensley, M. D., Hmieleski,K.M. & Pearce,C.L. (2006). The importance of vertical and shared leadership within new venture top management teams: Implications for the performance of startups. The Leadership Quarterly, 17: 217-231.
Eraslan, L. (2004). Liderlik olgusunun tarihsel evrimi, temel kavramlar ve yeni liderlik paradigmasının analizi. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 162.
Hulpia, H., Devos, G. & Rosseel, Y. (2009). The relationship between the perception of distributed leadership insecondary schools and teachers’ and teacher leaders’ job satisfaction and organizational commitment. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20(3), 291-317.
Hulpia, H., Devos, G. & Van Keer, H. (2009). The ınfluence of distributed leadership on teachers’ organizational commitment: A multilevel approach. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(1), 40-52.
James, K. T. (2011). Leadership in context lessons from new leadership theory and current leadership development practice. Commission on Leadership and Management in the NHS. The King’s Fund.
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (Third edition). The Guilford Press. New York. London.
Kocolowski, M.D. (2010). Shared leadership: Is it time for a change? Emerging Leadership Journeys, 3(1), 22-32.
Li,j., Wang, H. & Chen, C. (2008). Shared leadership network: A cooperative pattern in knowledge-based teams. Proceeding of the 39th Decision Sciences Institute Annual Meeting in Baltimore, 2991-2996.
Lindsay, D. R. , Day, D.V. & Halpin, S. M. (2011). Shared leadership in the military: Reality, possibility, or pipedream? Military Psychology, 23: 528-549.
M.E.B, Dış İlişkiler Genel Müdürlüğü. (2009). Okul liderliğinin geliştirilmesi konferansı özet raporu.http://abdigm.meb.gov.tr/eski_site/uaorgutler/OECD/OLIG_ozet_rapor.html indirilme tarihi: 10.09.2011
Pearce, C. L. (2004).The future of leadership: Combining vertical and sharedleadership to transform knowledge work. Academy of Management Executive, 18(1), 47-57.
Scott, L. & Caress, A. L. (2005). Shared governance and shared leadership: meeting the challenges of implementation. Journal of Nursing Management, 13, 4–12.
Slavit, D., Kennedy, A., Nelson, T., & Deuel, A. (2011). Reframing teacher leadership in the context of collective doing. Curriculum in Context, 37(1), 19-22.
Southworth, G. (2008). Primary school leadership today and tomorrow. School Leadership and Management. 28( 5) ,413-434.
Şimşek, Ö.F.(2007).Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş. Ankara: Ekinoks.
Wood, M. S. (2005). Determinants of shared leadership in management teams. International Journal of Leadership Studies. 1(1), 64-85.
Wood, M.S. & . Fields, D. (2007). Exploring the impact of shared leadership on management team member job outcomes. Baltic Journal of Management, 2 (3), 251-272.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors can retain copyright, while granting the journal right of first publication. Alternatively, authors can transfer copyright to the journal, which then permits authors non-commercial use of the work, including the right to place it in an open access archive. In addition, Creative Commons can be consulted for flexible copyright licenses.
©1999 Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
