Inspection and teachers’ emotions: An emotional evaluation of inspection
Keywords:
Inspection, control, teachers’ emotions, TurkeyAbstract
In the study, inspection is discussed in relation to the teachers’ feelings and emotions it creates before inspection, during inspection and after inspection process. Teacher’s emotions have been investigated intentionally as emotional side of education has been neglected. Education is closely related to the emotions of teachers, who are the most important producers of educational activities.
Educational activities are reduced to standard activities and defined with simple explanations or single labels such as ‘good-bad’, ‘successful-unsuccessful’, ‘adequate-inadequate’. Inspection causes emotions to be neglected. Moreover, recently, it has been discussed that there are approaches and systems that suggest constant and multi-dimensional inspection instead of traditional inspection.
Qualitative research model was used to understand of teacher emotions. A semi structured form was used for the 38 primary school teachers’ interviews. After teacher interviews were completed, we analyzed and compared the interviews. Participants’ expressions were checked in terms of correctness, potential validity and reliability problems such as misinterpretation.
The results of the study can be summarized as follows: There were no positive expressions related to the emotional impact of inspection on teachers. In addition, teachers felt that the inspectors were stressed, anxious, uneasy, accusatory, coercive, looking for defect and areas of unsuccessful teaching performance. Most of teachers reported that being observed and evaluated caused them to have negative emotions.
Teachers’ perceptions about inspection are found to be negative. There are no statements that indicate there is a positive impression of inspection on teachers. The emotions that are experienced before inspection: pressure, hurry, stress, concern, tension, anxiety, worry, uncertainty; during inspection: stress, tension, anger, loss of strength, humiliation and lack of self-efficacy, and after inspection: relaxation, stress, sorrow, anger, fury, meaninglessness, disappointment. The single positive emotion that the teachers use to describe an inspection is “relaxation”.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Akyıldız, S. (2007). İlköğretim denetmenlerinin etik davranışlarına ilişkin öğretmen görüşlerinin değerlendirilmesi. [Evaluation of teachers' opinions about the ethical behavior of primary school inspectors.] Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Diyarbakır: Dicle Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
Ball, S.J. (1993). Education policy, power relations and teachers' work. British Journal of Educational Studies, 41(2), 106-121.
Ball, S.J. (1997). Good school/bad school: Paradox and fabrication. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 18(3), 317-336.
Brimblecombe, N. & Ormston, M. (1995). Teachers' perceptions of school inspection: A stressful experience. Cambridge Journal of Education, 25(1), 53-62.
Bullough, R.V. & Pinnegar, S. (2009). The happiness of teaching (as eudemonia): disciplinary knowledge and the threat of performativity. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 15(2), 241-256.
Burton, W.H. (1930). Supervision. The American Journal of Nursing, 30(8), 1045-1052.
Case, P., Case, S. & Catling, S. (2000). Please show you're working: a critical assessment of the impact of OFSTED inspection on primary teachers. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21(4), 605-621.
Chapman, C. (2000). Improvement, inspection and self-review. Improving Schools, 3, no. 9: 57-63.
Ciğer, M. (2006). Kahramanmaraş ili ilköğretim müfettişlerinin ders denetimi surecinde gösterdikleri davranışların öğretmenleri güdülemesine ilişkin öğretmen ve müfettiş görüşleri. [Kahramanmaras province’ primary school teachers and inspectors’ opinions about the inspectors’ behaviours to motivate teachers.] Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
Dündar, A.A. (2005). İlköğretim okullarında yapılan teftişin okul başarısı ve gelişimi üzerine etkisi. [The effect of the primary school inspections on the performance and development of the schools.] Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Ankara: Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
Ehren, M.C.M. & Visscher, A.J. (2008). Improvement relationships between school inspections, school characteristics and school improvement. British Journal of Educational Studies, 56(2), 205-227.
Freire, P. (2008). Ezilenlerin Pedagojisi. [Pedagogy of the oppressed.] 6. Basım. Çev. Hattatoğlu ve Özbek. Ankara: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
Gewirtz, S. (2000). Bringing the politics back in: a critical analysis of quality discourses in education. British Journal of Educational Studies, 48(4), 352-370.
Gilroy, P. & Wilcox, B. (1997). OFSTED, criteria and the nature of social understanding: a Wittgensteinian critique of the practice of educational judgement. British Journal of Educational Studies, 45(1), 22-38.
Gökalp, S. (2010). İlköğretim Müfettişlerinin Öğretmen Teftişlerindeki Denetim Görevlerini Yerine Getirme Derecelerine İlişkin İlköğretim Okullarında Görev Yapan Öğretmenlerin Algılarının İncelenmesi. [The analysis of primary school teachers perceptions on the inspectors’ fulfillment levels control tasks.] Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Mersin: Mersin Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
Hall, C. & Noyes, A. (2009). New regimes of truth: the impact of performative school self evaluation systems on teachers’ professional identities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 850-856.
Hargreaves, A. (1998a). The Emotional Practice of Teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(8), 835-854.
Hargreaves, A. (1998b). The emotional politics of teaching and teacher development: with implications for educational leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1(4), 315-336.
Hargreaves, A. (2000). Mixed emotions: teachers' perceptions of their interactions with students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 811-826.
Jeffrey, B. & Woods, P. (1996). Feeling deprofessionalised: The social construction of emotions during an OFSTED inspection. Cambridge Journal of Education, 26(3), 325-343.
Kahraman, N. (2003). İlköğretim müfettişlerinin mesleki etik ilkeleri ve bu etik ilkelere uyma düzeyleri. [The professional ethical principles of primary school inspectors and comply with ethical requirements.] Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
Lowe, G. (1997). Improvement through inspection? Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference. (September 11-14, 1997: University of York) Fourth OFSTED Symposium. Retrieved May 5, 2011, from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/ documents/000000465.htm.
Nias, J. (1996). Thinking about feeling: the emotions in teaching. Cambridge Journal of Education, 26(3), 293-306.
Perryman, J. (2006). Panoptic performativity and school inspection regimes: disciplinary mechanisms and life under special measures, Journal of Education Policy, 21(2), 147-161.
Perryman, J. (2007). Inspection and emotion. Cambridge Journal of Education, 37(2), 173-190.
Perryman, J. (2009). Inspection and the fabrication of professional and performative processes. Journal of Education Policy, 24(5), 611-631.
Rosenthal, L. (2004). Do school inspections improve school quality? OFSTED inspections and school examination results in the UK. Economics of Education Review, 23, 143-151.
Tunç, B. (2001). İlköğretim müfettişlerinin problem çözme süreci açısından rollerini gerçekleştirme biçimleri. [The form of the primary school inspectors’ perform their roles in terms of problem-solving process.] Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Edirne: Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
Webb, P.T. (2005). The anatomy of accountability. Journal of Education Policy, 20(2), 189-208.
Woods, P. & Jeffrey, B. (1998). Choosing positions: Living the contradictions of OFSTED. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 19(4), 547-570.
Zembylas, M. (2003). Emotions and teacher identity: A poststructural perspective. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 9(3), 213-238.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors can retain copyright, while granting the journal right of first publication. Alternatively, authors can transfer copyright to the journal, which then permits authors non-commercial use of the work, including the right to place it in an open access archive. In addition, Creative Commons can be consulted for flexible copyright licenses.
©1999 Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.