Validity and reliability study of Quality of School Work Life (QSWL) scale

Authors

  • Abdurrahman Ilgan Duzce University
  • Atakan Ata University of Georgia
  • Sally J. Zepeda University of Georgia
  • Oyku Ozu-Cengiz Celal Bayar University

Keywords:

Quality, School life, Quality of school work life, Scale development, Validity and reliability

Abstract

QSWL in psychosocially manner defined as “the effect of the workplace on satisfaction with the job, satisfaction in non-work life domains, and satisfaction with overall life, personal happiness, and subjective well-being”. This research aimed to develop a valid and reliable measurement instrument that is designed to measure QSWL based on literature, expert and practitioner teachers’ knowledge. 784 teachers were participant of this research. Draft scale included 30 items of the instruments. To validate the scale exploratory factor analysis followed by confirmatory analysis. Exploratory factor analysis revealed that QSWL scale is composed of five dimensions. Confirmatory analysis revealed that χ2 / sd ratio were in intermediate level, value of RMSEA and RMR were in represents of acceptable fit whereas GFI and AGFI indexes were in weak level and finally NNFI and CFI were in sufficient value. Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient values for QSWL subdimensions were ranged between .62 and .85 whereas this value was .87 for composite scale. Consequently, this newly developed scale is a valid and reliable instrument that serves to measure and describe schools' quality of work life.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Abdurrahman Ilgan, Duzce University

Abdurrahman Ilgan, PhD, is an Assistant Professor in Duzce University College of Education, Turkey. Hisresearch interests include educational administration, instructional supervision, teacherprofessional development, instructional leadership, research methods in education, andeducational statistics. Dr Ilgan published a book about professional development of teachers andauthored some chapters in edited books. He has international and national refereed articles.

Atakan Ata, University of Georgia

Atakan Ata is a PhD student at the University of Georgia in the Department of Lifelong Education, Administration, and Policy. His research interests are education and democracy, professional development, and mixed methods research tradition.

Sally J. Zepeda, University of Georgia

Sally J. Zepeda, PhD, a former teacher and administrator, is a Professor in the Department of Lifelong Education, Administration, and Policy in the Program of Educational Administration and Policy. Dr. Zepeda is a Fellow in the Institute for Interdisciplinary Research in Education and Human Development at the University of Georgia, where she teaches courses in instructional supervision, professional development, teacher evaluation, and school improvement.

Oyku Ozu-Cengiz, Celal Bayar University

Oyku Ozu-Cengiz, PhD, is an Assistant Professor at Celal Bayar University Faculty of Education, Psychological Counseling and Consultation Department, Turkey. Her research interests are positive psychology, humanistic counseling and existential approaches in counseling. She has written chapters in edited books and published articles in international refereed journals.

References

Akdere, M. (2006). Improving quality of work-life: Implications for human resources. The Business Review, 6(1), 173-177.

Awosusi, O. (2010). Assessment of quality of working-life of nurses in two tertiary hospitals in Ekiti State, Nigeria. African Research Review, 4(2), 113-124.

Baleghizadeh, S., & Gordani, Y. (2012). Motivation and quality of work life among secondary school efl teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(7), 30-42.

Beer, M., Spector, B., Lawrence, P.R., Mills, D.Q., &Walton, R. E. (1985). Human Resource Management. New York: Free Press.

Bindu, J., & Yashika, S. (2014). Quality work life with special reference to academic sector. Research Journal of Management Science, 3(1), 14-17.

Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistikler. [Multivariate statistics for social sciences]. Ankara: Pegem Yayıncılık

Danna, K., & Griffin, R.W. (1999). Health and well-being in the workplace: A review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Management, 25(3), 357-384.

Darabi, M., Mehdizadeh, A.H., Arefi, M., & Ghasemi, A.A. (2013). Relationship between quality of work life and job satisfaction on school teachers in Kermanshah. Journal of Educational and Management Studies, 3(4), 508-513.

Davis, L.E., & Cherns, A. (1975). The quality of working life: Problems, prospects, and the state of the art. New York: Free Press.

Day, C., Elliot, B., & Kington, A. (2005). Reform, standards and teacher identity: Challenges of sustaining commitment. Teaching and teacher Education, 21(5), 563-577.

DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Emadzadeh, M.K., Khorasani, M., & Nematizadeh, F. (2012). Assessing the quality of work life of primary school teachers in Isfahan City. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 3(9), 438-448.

Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. (3rd Ed.). Los Angles: Sage Publication.

Friedman, D. E., Rimsky, C., & Johnson, A. A.(1996). College and University Reference Guide to Work/Family Programs. New York: Families and Work Institute.

Gayathiri, R., & Ramakrishnan, L. (2013). Quality of work life – Linkage with job satisfaction and performance. International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 2(1), 1-8. Retrieved from www.ijbmi.org.

Grimm, L. G., & Yarnold, P. R. (1995). Reading and understanding multivariate statistics. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Goode, D.A. (1989). Quality of life, quality of work life. In W. E. Kiernan & R. L. Schalock (Eds.), Economics, industry, and disability: A look ahead (pp. 337-349). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Hannif, Z., Burgess, J., & Connell, J. (2008). Call centeres and the quality of work life: Towards a research agenda. Journal of Industrail Relations, 50(2), 171-284.

Hsu, M.Y., & Kernohan, G. (2005). Dimensions of hospital nurses’ quality of working life. Nursing and Healthcare Management and Policy, 120-130. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Hutcheson, G., & Sofroniou, N. (1999). The multivariate social scientist. London: Sage Publicaiton.

Jofreh, M., Yasini, A., Dehsorkhi, H.F., & Hayat, A. (2013). The relationship between EFL teachers’ quality of work life and job motivation. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 13(3), 338-346.

Kahn, J. H. (2006). Factor analysis in counseling psychology research, training, and practice: Principles, advances, and applications. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 684-718.

Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.

Lu, H., While, A.E., & Barriball, L.K. (2007). A model of job satisfaction of nurses: A reflection of nurses’ working lives in mainland china. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 58(5), 468-479.

Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391-410.

Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesistesting approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320-341.

Martel, J.-P., & Dupuis, G. (2006). Quality of work life: Theoretical and methodological problems, and presentation of a new model and measuring instrument. Social Indicators Research, 77(2), 333-368.

McDonal, R. P., & Moon-Ho, R. H. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psyhological Methods, 75(2), 420-435.

Mirvis, P. H., Lawler, E. E. (1984). Accounting for the quality of work life. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 5, 197-212.

Nadler, D. A., & Lawler, E. E. (1983). Quality of work life: Perspectives and directions. Organizational Dynamics, 11(3), 20-30.

Robbins, S.P. (1989). Organizational behaviour: Concepts, controversies, applications. NJ: Prentice Hall.

Sirgy, M.J., Efraty, D., Siegel, P., & Lee, D.-J. (2001). A new measure of quality of work life (qwl) based on need satisfaction and spillover theories. Social indicators research, 55(3), 241-302.

Spector, P.E. (1997). Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, causes, and consequences (Vol. 3): Sage.

Sümer, N. (2000). Yapısal eşitlik modelleri: Temel kavramlar ve örnek uygulamalar. [Structural equation modeling: Basic concepts and example applications]. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 3(3), 49-74.

Şimşek, Ö. F. (2007). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş: Temel ilkeler ve Lisrel uygulamaları.. [Introduction to structural equation modeling: Basic concepts and Lisrel applications]. Ankara: Ekinoks Yayınevi.

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). New York: Harper & Row.

Tsai, P.C.-F., Yen, Y.-F., Huang, L.-C., & Huang, I.-C. (2007). A study on motivating employees’ learning commitment in the post-downsizing era: Job satisfaction perspective. Journal of World Business, 42(2), 157-169.

Velicer,W. F., & Fava, J. L. (1998). Effects of variable and subject sampling on factor pattern recovery. Psychological Methods, 3, 231-251.

Walton, R.E. (1973). Quality of working life: What is it? Sloan Management Review, 15(1), 11-21.

Worthington, R.L., & Whittaker, T.A. (2006), “Scale development research: a content analysis and recommendations for best practices”, The Counseling Psychologist, 34 (6), 806-838.

Zhao, X.W., Sun, T., QiuRu, C., Li, C., WiaoJian, D., Fan, L., & Liu, Y. (2012). The impact of quality of worklife on job embeddedness and affective commitment and their coeffect on turnover intention of nurses. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 22, 780-788.

Volume 11, Issue 2

Downloads

Published

2014-07-16

How to Cite

Ilgan, A., Ata, A., Zepeda, S. J., & Ozu-Cengiz, O. (2014). Validity and reliability study of Quality of School Work Life (QSWL) scale. Journal of Human Sciences, 11(2), 114–137. Retrieved from https://j-humansciences.com/ojs/index.php/IJHS/article/view/2866

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 2 (2014)

Section

Educational Administration and Management

License

Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi ISSN:1303-5134
International Journal of Human Sciences ISSN:2458-9489
 
is an "Open Access Journal" that uses a funding model that does not charge readers or their institutions for access. From the BOAI definition of open access, users take the right of read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles.

Authors can retain copyright, while granting the journal right of first publication. Alternatively, authors can transfer copyright to the journal, which then permits authors non-commercial use of the work, including the right to place it in an open access archive. In addition, Creative Commons can be consulted for flexible copyright licenses.

©1999 Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.