Turkish adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Peer Aggression Coping Self-Efficacy Scale (PA-CSES)

Authors

  • Orkide Bakalım Uşak University
  • Fatma Selda Öz 9 Eylül University

Keywords:

Peer, Aggression, Coping self-efficacy, Scale adaptation

Abstract

The present study aimed to adapt Peer Aggression Coping Self-Efficacy Scale to Turkish version. Data were gathered from 639 students in grades 6, 7, 8 and 9. As a result of explanatory analysis carried out to test the construct validity of PA-CSES, a four factor construct was also confirmed by the Turkish students. Apart from this, as a result of analysis, girls level of self-efficacy for avoiding aggressive behavior, self efficacy for proactive behavior and self-efficacy for avoiding self-blame were much higher than those of boys. In addition, the students’ in grade 6, level of self-efficacy for avoiding aggressive behavior, self efficacy for proactive behavior, self-efficacy for victim- role disengagements were also much higher than those of the students in grade 9. The findings were discussed in terms of literature and some suggestions were proposed for further studies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Orkide Bakalım, Uşak University

Assist. Prof. Dr., Uşak University, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Guidance and Counseling Program

Fatma Selda Öz, 9 Eylül University

Lecturer, Dokuz Eylül University, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Guidance and Counseling Program

References

Akdeniz. M. (2007). Öfke kontrolü eğitiminin lise öğrencilerinde öfke kontrolü becerilerine etkisi. (The effect of anger control skills on high school students’ anger control training). Unpublished master thesis. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Adana.

Anderson. J. C. & Gerbing. D. W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence. imperoper solutions and googness-fit indicesfor maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psycometrica. 49. 155-173

Arslan. S. (2008). Lise öğrencilerinde özkavram ve aile ilişkisinin akran zorbalığına etkisi. (The effect of family and self concept relation on peer bullying in high school students.) Unpublished doctoral thesis . İstanbul Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü: İstanbul.

Bandura. A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist. 28. 117-148.

Bandura. A. (1997). Self-efficacy. Harvard Mental Health Letter. 13(9).

Benight. C.C. & Harper. M.L. (2002). Coping self-efficacy perceptions as a mediator between acute stress response and long-term distress following natural disasters. Journal of Traumatic Stress. 15. 177-186.

Benight. C.C. & Bandura. A. (2004). Social cognitive theory of posttaumatic recovery: the role perceived self-efficacy. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 42. 1129-1148.

Benight. C.C.. Harding-Taylor. A.S.. Midboe . A.M. ve Durham. R.L. (2004). Development and psychometric validation of a domestic violence coping self-efficacy measure (DV-CSE). Journal of Traumatic Stress. 17. 505-508.

Büyüköztürk. Ş. (2012). Sosyal Bilimler için Veri Analizi El Kitabı İstatistik. Araştırma Deseni SPSS Uygulamaları ve Yorum (16. Baskı). Ankara: PEGEM

Calaguas. G. (2011). The incidence of peer aggression and peer victimization between the sexes. International Journal of Human Sciences. 8. 151.

Chesney. M.A.. Neilands. T.B.. Chambers. D.B.. Taylor. J.M. & Folkman. S. (2006). A validity and reliability study of the coping self efficacy scale. British Journal of Health Psychology. 11. 421-437.

Gallup. A.C.. O’Brien. D.T. & Wilson. D.S. (2010). The relationship between adolescent peer aggression and responses to a sequental prisoner’s dilemma game during college: an explorative study. Journal of Social. Evolutionary and Cultural Psychology. 4. 277-289.

Genç. G. (2007). Genel liselerde akran zorbalığı ve yönetimi. [Peer bullying and its management in high schools]. Unpublished doctoral thesis. İnönü Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Malatya.

Gökler. R. (2009). Okullarda akran zorbalığı [Peer bullying in schools]. Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi. 6 (2).

Graham. S.. Bellmore. A.D. & Mize. J. (2006). Peer victimization. aggression and their co-occurence in middle school: Pathways to adjustment problems. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 34. 363-378.

Hanish. L.D.& Guerra. N.G. (2002). A longitudinal analysis of patterns of adjustment following peer victimization. Develolopment and Psychology. 14. 69-89.

Hawker. D.S.& Boulton. M.J. (2000). Twenty years research on peer victimization and psychosocial maladjustment : a meta analytic review of cross-sectional studies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 41. 441-455.

Hoover. J.H.. Oliver. R. & Hazler. R.J. (1992). Bullying: perceptions of adolescent victims in midwestern USA. School Psychology International. 13. 5-16.

Hu. L –T. & Bentler. P. M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling. 6. 1-55

Hulberti. N.J. ve Morrison. V.L. (2006). A preliminary study into stres in paliative care: optimism. self efficacy and social support. Psychology. Health ve Medicine. 11. 246-255

Hunter. S; Boyle. J. & Warden. D. (2004). Help seeking among child and adolescent victims of peer aggression and bullying: The influence of school stage. gender. victimisation. appraisal and emotion. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 74. 375-390.

Johnson. L.E. and Benight. C.C. (2003). Effects of trauma-focused research on recent domestic violence survivors. Journal of Traumatic Stress. 16. 567-571.

Jöreskog. K.G. and Sörbom. D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Puplishers.

Karataş. Z. (2009). Bilişsel-davranışçı teknikler kullanılarak yapılan öfke yönetimi programının ergenlerin saldırganlığını azaltmadaki etkisi. [The Effect of Anger Management Programme through Cognitive Behavioral Techniques on the Decrease of Adolescents Aggression]Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 26. 12-24.

Marsh. H. W. & Hocevar. D. (1988). A new more powerful approachto multitrait-multimethod analyses: application of second-order confirmatory factor anaylsis. Journal of Applied Psychology. 73.107-117.

Marsh. H. W.. Balla. J. R..& McDonald. R. P. (1988). Googness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin. 103. 391-410.

Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (2006). Eğitim ortamında şiddetin önlenmesi ve azaltılması strateji ve eylem planı (2006-2011). Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Özel Eğitim ve Rehberlik Genel Müdürlüğü.

Olweus. D. (1997). Bully/victim problems in school: facts and intervention. European Journal of Psychology of Education. 12 (4). 495-510).

Öz. A.Ş.. Kırımoğlu. H. & Temiz. A. (2011). İlköğretim 2. kademe öğrencilerinin spor yapma durumlarına göre zorbalık eğilimleri ve zorbalıkla baş etme tarzlarının spor ve özel eğitim açılarından incelenmesi (From special and physical education point of view: a study on junior high students bullying tendencies and ways to cope with bullying depending on the level of playing sports). Selçuk Üniversitesi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilim Dergisi. 13. 237-245.

Özer. E.M. & Bandura. A. (1990). Mechanism governing empowerment effects: a self analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 3. 472-486.

Pişkin. M. (2002). Okul zorbalığı: Tanımı. türleri. ilişkili olduğu faktörler ve alınabilecek önlemler. (School Bullying: Definition, types, related factors and strategies to prevent bullying problems). Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri. 2 (2). 531-562.

Pişkin. M. (2005). Ankara Valiliği İl Milli Eğitim Müdürlüğü. Özel Eğitim Rehberlik ve Psikolojik Danışma Hizmetleri Bölümü “Okullarda Şiddet” Paneli. Ankara: 12 Ocak 2005.

Schwarzer. R. & Jerusalem. M. (1979). General Self-Efficacy Scale. In R. Schwarzer (Ed.). Self efficacy: Thought control of action (pp. 195-213).

Singh. P & Bussey. K. (2009). The development of a peer aggression coping self-efficacy scale for adolescents. British Journal of Developmental Psychology. 27. 971-992.

Singh. P & Bussey. K. (2010). Peer victimization and psychological maladjustment: The mediating role of coping self-efficacy. Journal of Research on Adolescence. 1 -14.

Şahan. M. (2007). Lise öğrencilerinde saldırganlığı yordayan değişkenlerin incelenmesi. (An examination of some variables which predict high school students aggression). Unpublished master thesis. Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Ankara.

TBMM Araştırma Komisyonu Raporu (2007). Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi çocuklarda ve gençlerde artan şiddet eğilimi ile okullarda meydana gelen olayların araştırılarak alınması gereken önlemlerin belirlenmesi amacıyla kurulan meclis araştırması komisyon raporu. Ankara: Özel Eğitim ve Rehberlik Danışma Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü.

Tıpırdamaz Sipahi. H. (2008). İzmir ili Bornova ilçesinde ilköğretim 6. ve 7.sınıf öğrencilerinde akran zorbalığı. etkileyen ve eşlik eden faktörler.( Bullying in sixth and seventh grade primary school students in Bornova region of Izmir province and its determinants and associated factors). Unpublished doctoral thesis. Ege Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü. İzmir.

Totan. T. & Yöndem. Z.D. (2007). Ergenlerde zorbalığın anne. baba ve akran ilişkileri açısından incelenmesi. (The investigation of bullying in adolescence related to parent and peer relations). Ege Eğitim Dergisi. 8. 53-68.

Totan. T. (2008). Ergenlerde zorbalığın anne. baba ve akran ilişkileri açısından incelenmesi. (The investigation of bullying in adolescence related to parent and peer relations). Unpublished master thesis. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Bolu.

Uz Baş. A. (2010). Sınıf temelli bir soysa beceri eğitimi programının ilköğretim dördüncü sınıf öğrencilerinin güvengenlik ve saldırganlık düzeyleri üzerindeki etkisi.( The effects of a classroom based social skills training program on the levels of assertiveness and aggressiveness of fourth grade elementary school students). Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi. 7 (2). 732-747.

Uz Baş. A.. Öz. F.S. & Kabasakal. Z. (2012). İlköğretim ve ortaöğretim okullarında reaktif ve proaktif saldırganlık: okul psikolojik danışmanlarının görüş ve yaklaşımları. (Reactive and proactive aggression in elementary and high schools:School counselors’ views and approaches). Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 23. 354-370.

White. D.D.. Gallup. A.C. & Gallup. G.G. (2010). Indirect peer aggression in adolescence and reproductive behavior. Evolutionary Psychology. 49-65.

Yaban. E.H. (2010). Ergenlerin arkadaşlık niteliği. ebeveynden ve okul ortamında öğretmenden algılanan destek ile akran zorbalığı/zorbalığa maruz kalma arasındaki ilişkiler.( The relations among adolescents? friendship quality, perceived parental support, teacher support in school climate and peer bullying/victimization ). Unpublished master thesis. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Ankara.

Yavuzer. Y. & Üre. Ö. (2010). Saldırganlığı önlemeye yönelik psikoeğitim programının lise öğrencilerindeki saldırganlığı azaltmaya etkisi.(The effect of psycho-education program towards preventing aggression on decreasing aggressiveness of high school students) . Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 24. 390-405.

Downloads

Published

2014-10-15

How to Cite

Bakalım, O., & Öz, F. S. (2014). Turkish adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Peer Aggression Coping Self-Efficacy Scale (PA-CSES). Journal of Human Sciences, 11(2), 827–841. Retrieved from https://j-humansciences.com/ojs/index.php/IJHS/article/view/2921

Issue

Section

Psychology