Employees’ relative deprivation for females and supervisory commitment: The mediating roles of interpersonal justice, informational justice, and perceived empathy
Keywords:
Relative Deprivation, Interpersonal Justice, Informational Justice, Empathy, Supervisory CommitmentAbstract
The present study aims to test a model derived from a conceptual framework that attempted to explain negative interactions among supervisor-employee dyads from a Relative Deprivation Theory (RDT) and justice-related perspective. Employees’ perceptions of fraternal (group) deprivation on part of females compared to males in their organizations were suggested to be related to their interpersonal and informational justice perceptions as well as their perceptions of supervisors’ empathy. Employees’ perceptions of justice and empathy, in turn, were suggested to be positively associated with overall supervisory commitment. Moreover, the moderating effects of employee gender on the proposed relationships were investigated. The data was collected from 114 employees who were enrolled in undergraduate classes in a Southwestern university in USA. The proposed model as well as the alternative models were tested by Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) technique using AMOS 6.0 software. The findings revealed that proposed mediated model was supported by the data for the independent variable of employee perceptions of “affective” relative deprivation for females in the organization and for the dependent variables of “affective supervisory commitment” and “continuance supervisory commitment”. However, employees’ gender did not have a moderating effect on the relationships in the mediated model that was supported by the data. The results are discussed in terms of their theoretical and practical implications as well as the suggestions for future research.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Allen, N.J., & Meyer, J.A. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective continuance and normative organizational commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1-18.
Aycan, Z. (2004). Key success factors for women in management in Turkey. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53(3), 453-477.
Beaton, A. M., & Tougas, F. (1997). The representation of women in management: The more, the merrier? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 773–782.
Beaton, A. M., Tougas, F., & Laplante, J. (2007). Love it or leave it: A look at women in clerical occupations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(12), 2827-2839.
Bies, R., & Moag, J. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. Lewicki, B. Sheppard, & M. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations (pp. 43-55). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Blau, P.(1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley.
Bruning, N. S., Keup, L., & Cooper, C. L. (1996, April). Justice perceptions and outcomes in a restructured organization: A longitudinal study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Diego, CA.
Buttner, E. H. (2004). How do we “dis” students? A model of (dis)respectful business instructor behavior. Journal of Management Education, 28 (3), 319-334.
Chi, S., & Lo, H. (2003). Taiwanese employees’ justice perceptions of coworkers’ punitive events. Journal of Social Psychology, 143 (1), 27-42.
Cole, N. D. (2004). Gender differences in perceived disciplinary fairness. Gender, Work and Organization, 11 (3), 254-279.
Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386-400.
Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425-445.
Crosby, F. (1976). A model of egoistical relative deprivation. Psychological Review, 83(2), 85-113.
Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113-126.
Erdogan, B., Liden, R. C., & Kraimer, M. L. (2006). Justice and leader – member exchange: The moderating role of organizational culture. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 395 - 406.
Folger, R., & Konovsky, M. K. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 115-130.
Garcia-Ratemero, R., & Lopez-Zafra, E. (2006). Prejudice against women in male-congenial environments: Perceptions of gender role incongruity in leadership. Sex Roles, 55, 51-61.
Goodman, D. J. (2000). Motivating people from privileged groups to support social justice. Teachers College Record, 102(6), 1061-1085.
Greenberg, J. (1993). Justice in the Workplace: Approaching Fairness in Human Resource Management. In R. Cropanzano (Eds.), The Social Side of Fairness: Interpersonal and Informational Classes of Organizational Justice. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Grissom, J. A., Nicholson-Crotty, J., & Keiser, L. (2012). Does my boss’s gender matter? Explaining job satisfaction and employee turnover in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 649–673.
Gurr, T. R. (1970). Why men rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and Moral Development: Implications for Caring and Justice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Jackson, L. A. (1989). Relative deprivation and the gender wage gap. Journal of Social Issues, 45(4), 117-133.
Jawad, M., Raja, S., Abraiz, A., & Tabassum, T. M. (2012). Role of organizational justice in organizational commitment with moderating effect of employee work attitudes. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 5(4): 39-45.
Kernan, M. C., & Hanges, P. J. (2002). Survivor reactions to reorganization: antecedents and consequences of procedural, interpersonal and information justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 916-928.
Leventhal, G. S. (1976). Fairness in social relationships. In Thibaut J. W, Spence J. T, Carson, R. C. (Eds.), Contemporary topics in social psychology (pp. 211-240). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
Lind, A.E. and Tyler, T.R. (1988), The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice, Plenum Press, New York, NY.
Martin, C. L., & Bennett, n. (1996). The role of justice judgments in explaining the relationship between job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Group and Organization Management, 21, 84-104.
Mathison, D. (1986). Sex differences in the perception of assertiveness among female managers. Journal of Social Psychology, 126(5), 599-606.
McFarlin, D. B., & Sweeney, P. D. (1992). Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 626-637.
Mohan, N., & Ruggiero, J. (2003). Compensation of differences between male and female CEOs for publicly traded firms: A nonparametric analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54, 1247–1248.
Moreau, M. P., Osgood, J., & Halsall, A. (2007). Making sense of the glass ceiling: An exploration of women teachers’ discourses. Gender and Education, 19(2), 237-253.
Mossholder, K. W., Bennett, N., & Martin, C. L. (1998). A multilevel analysis of procedural justice context. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 131-141.
Parker, S. K., & Axtell, C. M. (2001). Seeing another view point: Antecedents and outcomes of employee perspective-taking. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1085-1100.
Petta, G., & Walker, I. (1992). Relative deprivation and ethnic identity. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 285-293.
Piccolo, R. F., Bardes, M., Mayer, D. M., & Judge, T. A. (2008). Does high quality leader-member exchange accentuate the effects of organizational justice?. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17 (2), 273 – 298.
Pistrang, N., Solomons, W., & Barker, C. (1999). Peer support for women with breast cancer: The role of empathy and self-disclosure. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 9, 217-229.
Runciman, W. G. (1968). Problems of research on relative deprivation. In H. H. Hyman & E. Singer (Eds.), Readings in reference group theory and research (pp. 69–76). New York: Free Press.
Selim, R., & Ilkkaracan, I. (2002, September). Gender inequalities in the labor market in Turkey: Some empirical evidence. Paper presented at 6th METU International Conference in Economics, Ankara, Turkey.
Simons, T., & Roberson, Q. (2003). Why managers should care about fairness: The effects of aggregate justice perceptions on organizational outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 432-443.
Shapiro, D. L., Buttner, E. H., & Barry, B. (1994). Explanations: What factors enhance their perceived adequacy? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58(3), 346-368.
Stinglhamber, F., Bentein, K., & Vandenberghe, C. (2002). Extension of the 3-component model of commitment to 5 foci: Development of measures and substantive tests. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18, 123-138.
Sumer, H. C. (2006). Women in management: Still waiting to be full members of the club. Sex Roles, 55, 63-72.
Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Toussaint, L., & Webb, J. R. (2005). Gender differences in the relationship between empathy and forgiveness. Journal of Social Psychology, 145(6), 673-685.
Tripathi, R. C., & Strivastava, R. (1981). Relative deprivation and intergroup attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 11, 313-318.
Walker, I., & Pettigrew, T.F. (1984). Relative deprivation theory: An overview and conceptual critique. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 301-310.
Wasti, S. (2002). Affective and continuance commitment to the organization: Test of an integrated model in the Turkish context. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 26, 525-550.
Wharton, A. S. & Baron, J. N. (1991). Satisfaction? The psychological impact of gender segregation on women at work. The Sociological Quarterly, 32(3), 365-387.
Williams, H. M., Parker, S. K., & Turner, N. (2007). Perceived dissimilarity and perspective taking within work teams. Group and Organization Management, 32(5), 569-597.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors can retain copyright, while granting the journal right of first publication. Alternatively, authors can transfer copyright to the journal, which then permits authors non-commercial use of the work, including the right to place it in an open access archive. In addition, Creative Commons can be consulted for flexible copyright licenses.
©1999 Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
