Police use of force: individualistic, situational, and organizational approach<p>Polisin zor kullanmasi: bireysel, durumsal ve organizasyonel yaklaşım
Keywords:
police, use of force, individual approach, situational approach, organizational approach, polis, kuvvet kullanma, bireysel yaklaşım, durumsal yaklaşım, kurumsal yaklaşımAbstract
While ensuring public safety and fighting against criminals the police are given exceptional powers such as the use of force to protect themselves as well as others in the process of fighting criminals. In a democratic society the limits of the use of force given by the state to the police is regulated by law. Misuse of power by the police, regarding humanitarian concerns, in terms of philosophical dilemmas and political implications has great impact on people. Use of force is defined as; use of physical strength and any equipment in increased proportion to neutralize acts of resistance or attack. The power to use of force is a direct intervention to the fundamental rights and freedoms of persons. Therefore, use of excessive force is considered as a direct violation of human rights. There have been numerous researches and studies about Police use of force. However, the complex structure of use of force, and it association with many factors creates a lot of limitations in this area. Therefore, the researchers have systematized the use of force by the police and focused on situational and institutional factors. Individual factors affecting the use of power and force by the police officers are defined as; The age of the police officer, education level and occupational experience. Regarding situational factors the researchers have focused on characteristics like; type of event that the police officer has encountered the public and the characteristics the suspects. Regarding explaining the Institutional factors it is focused on; the affect of the police culture (subculture) and service delivery philosophy of de unit that the officer is working at.
Özet
Kamunun güvenliğini sağlama ve suçlularla mücadele etme görevini yerine getirirken polise hem kendisini hem de başkalarını koruması ve suçlularla mücadele edebilmesi için zor kullanma gibi bir takım istisnai yetkiler verilmiştir. Demokratik toplumlarda devletin polise vermiş olduğu zor kullanma yetkisinin sınırları hukuk tarafından düzenlenmiştir. Polisin sahip olduğu gücü suiistimal etmesi insani kaygılar, felsefi ikilemler ve politik sonuçlar açısından halk üzerinde büyük etkilere sahiptir. Zor kullanma; direnme ve saldırı karşısında bu fiilleri etkisiz hale getirecek derecede artan nispette bedeni kuvvet her türlü teçhizatı kullanmak şeklinde tanımlanmaktadır. Zor kullanma yetkisi kişilerin temel hak ve özgürlüklerine doğrudan bir müdahaledir. Bu nedenle zor kullanma yetkisinin aşılması doğrudan insan hakları ihlali sayılmaktadır. Polisin zor kullanması ile ilgili sayısız araştırmalar ve çalışmalar yapılmıştır. Ancak, zor kullanmanın kompleks yapısı ve çok çeşitli nedenlerle ilişkili olmasından dolayı bu alanda oldukça fazla sınırlamalar vardır. Bu nedenle, araştırmacılar polisin kuvvet kullanmasını sistematize ederek bireysel, durumsal ve kurumsal faktörlerin üzerinde durmuşlardır. Polis memurlarının güç ve kuvvet kullanmasını etkileyen bireysel faktörler; polis memurlarının yaşı, eğitim seviyesi, mesleki tecrübesi gibi karakteristikleri üzerinde durulmuştur. Durumsal faktörler; polislerin halk ile karşı karşıya geldikleri olayların cinsi ve şüphelilerin karakteristikleri üzerinde yoğunlaşmıştır. Kurumsal faktörler; polisin memurlarının görev yaptığı polis biriminin kurumsal kültürü ve hizmet anlayışının etkilerini açıklamaya çalışmaktadır.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Adams, K. (1999). What we know about use of force. U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice and Bureau of Justice Statistics. Washington D.C. October 1999. NCJ 176330
Alpert, G. ve Dunham, R. (1999). The force factor: Measuring and assessing police use of force and suspect resistance in use of force by police: Overview of national and local Data. U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice and Bureau of Justice Statistics. October 1999. NCJ 176330
Armacost, E. (2004). Organizational culture and police misconduct. The George Washington Law Review.72, 3.
Brand, S., Stroshine, M.S,. ve Frank, J. (2001). Who are the complaint- prone officers? An examination of the relationship between police `officers’ attributes, arrest activity, assignment, and citizens’ complaints about excessive force. Journal of Criminal Justice.Vol. 29 521-529
Cao, L. Ve Huang, B. (2000). Determinants of citizen’s complaints against police abuse of power. Journal of Criminal Justice.28(3) 203-210
Cerrah, İbrahim, (2011). Polis Etiği. Polis Akademisi Yayınları, Ankara
Chaiken, J. ve Travis, J. (1996). National data collection on police use of force. U.S. Department of Justice.
Eryılmaz, B. ve Bozlak, Ayhan, (2009). Hukukumuzda Zor ve Silah Kullanma Yektisi. TBB Dergisi, (83), 223-277
Fyfe, J. (1988). Police use of deadly force: Research and reform. Justice Quarterly, 5(2)165-201.
Friedrich, R. (1980). Police use of force: Individuals, situations, and organizations. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 452: 82-97.
Garner, J., Schade, T., Hepburn, J. ve Buchanan, J. (1995) Measuring the continuum of force used by and against the police. Criminal Justice Review. 20,.2
Garner, Joel H. ve Maxwell, C. (1999). Measuring the amount of force used by and against the police in six jurisdictions in use of force by police: National institute of justice and bureau of justice statistics. NCJ 1763 Riverview of National And Local Data. Washington D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice,
Garner, J. H. ve Maxwell, C. (2002). Characteristics associated with the prevalence and severity of force used by the police. Justice Quarterly. 2002-19
Henriquez, M. A., (1999). IACP national database project on police use of force in use of force by police, Overview of National and Local Data, ( Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, NCJ 176360.
Holmes, M. (2000). Minority threat and police brutality: Determinants of civil rights criminal complaints in U.S. municipalities. Criminology. Vol.38 No.2-343
International Association of Chiefs of Police (2001). Police use of force in America. Retrieved June 2007 from http://www.theiacp.org/documents/pdfs/Publications/2001useofforce.pdf
Kaminski, R. ve Digovani, C. & Downs, R. ( 2004). The use of force between the police and person with impaired judgment. Police Quarterly Vol.7 No.3
Kelling, G. ve Coles, C (1996). Fixing Broken Windows: Restoring Order and Reducing Crime in Our Communities. Free Press. New York
Maguire, E. & Mastrofski, S. (2000). Patterns of community policing in the united states. Police Quarterly. 3(1) 4-45.
Mastrofski, S., Reisig, M. ve McCluskey, J. (2002). Police disrespect toward the public: An encounter-based analysis. Criminology, 40(3), 519-551.
McElvain, J. ve Kposowa, A.(2004). Police officers characteristics and internal affairs investigations for use of force allegations. Journal of Criminal Justice 32, 265-279.
McEwen, T, (1996). National data collection on police use of force. US Department of Justice Bureau of Statistics National Institute of Justice
Montgomery, D. (2005). Excessive force. FBI Bulletin. Bull. 74 , 8-11
Morrison, G. (2006). Deadly force programs among larger U.S. police departments. Police Quarterly. Vol 9, (3), 331-360
Paoline, E. A. ve Terrill, W. (2007). Force continuums: Moving beyond speculation and toward empiricisms. Police Administration. Vol. May 2007, pp27
Perez, A., Berg, K.M. ve Myers, D.J. (2003). Police and riots. Journal of Black Studies. 34, (2) pp.153-182
Pinizzotto, Anthony J., Davis, Edward F., Bohrer, Shannon B., ve Infanti, Benjamin J.(2012). Law enforcement restrain in the US of deadly force with in the Context of the deadly mix, International Journel of Police Science and Management. 14, (4) 285-298.
Schuck, A.M. (2004). The masking of racial and ethnic disparity in police use of physical force: The effects of gender and custody status. Journal of Criminal Justice, 32, 557-564
Sevindik, Mürsel., Esen, Erol., Gedikli, Mustafa. (2011). Polis Savunma Taktikleri. Polis Akademisi Yayınları, Ankara.
Sigelman, L., Welch, S,. Bledsoe, T., ve Combs, M. (1997). Police brutality and public perception of racial discrimination: A tale of two beatings. Political Research Quarterly 50,(4.)777-791.
Skogan, W. (2005). Citizens’ satisfaction with police encounters. Police Quarterly. 8 298-321
Terrill, W. ve McCluskey, J. (2002), Citizen complaints and problem officers: Examining officer behavior. Journal of Criminal Justice, 30 143-55.
Terrill, W. ve Mastrofski, S. D. (2002). Situational and officer based determinants of police coercion. Justice Quarterly, 19, 215–248.
Terrill, W., Paoline, E. & Manning, P.(2003). Police culture and coercion. Criminology. Volume 41, (4).pp1003-1034
Terrill, W. (2005). Police use of force: A transactional approach. Justice Quarterly. 22, (1) pp 107-138
Terrill, W., Alpert, G., Dunham, R.ve Smith. (2003). A management toll for evaluation police use of force: An application of the force factor. Police Quarterly 6 (2) 150-171
Terrill, W. ve Reisig, M.( 2003). Neighborhood context and police use of force. Journal of Researching and Delinquency. Vol. (3) .291-321
Tuch, S. ve Weitzer, R. (1997). Trends: Racial differences in attitudes towards the police. The Public Opinion Quarterly. Vol. (61) 4
Tyler, T.(2005). Police in black and white: Ethnic group differences in trust and confidence in the police. Police Quarterly, 8 (3) 322-342.
White, M. (2002). Examining the impact of external influences on police use of deadly force over time. Evaluation Review 27 (1) pp131-151
Worden, R. E., Shepard, R. L., ve Mastrofski, S. D. (1996). On the meaning and measurement of suspects’ demeanor toward the police. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 33(3):324-336.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors can retain copyright, while granting the journal right of first publication. Alternatively, authors can transfer copyright to the journal, which then permits authors non-commercial use of the work, including the right to place it in an open access archive. In addition, Creative Commons can be consulted for flexible copyright licenses.
©1999 Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.