Cognitive analysis of the (Bingol Anti Terror Police Department) BATPD Buddy Program

Authors

  • Murat Erkan Eren University Of North Texas
  • Engin Gulen Sam Houston State University

Keywords:

Law enforcement, buddy programs, cognitive analysis, knowledge sharing, performance increasing

Abstract

Buddy programs help newcomers to smooth transition. The programs also try to increase the performance of the new personnel, give them a moral support and provide a proper atmosphere. This study aims to figure out the deficiencies of the buddy program implemented in Bingol Anti-Terror Police Department (BATPD) and try to develop effective solutions for the program’s shortages. Thus, the newcomers are able to adapt to the organization in the fastest way without losing time and energy. In this study, the researcher applied observations and interviews to measure the effectiveness of the program. The participants were selected all of the newcomers who joined the organization in 2012. Data collection process took almost 12 months. According to results of the research, insufficient physical conditions of the unit, multitasking character of the personnel, and incompetent buddies are three reasons that hinder the program from being more successful. Training programs for buddies, focusing on one task at the one time, and more comfortable designed atmosphere in the organization are potential solutions for a better program.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Murat Erkan Eren, University Of North Texas

  • Ph.D. degree in Information Science at University of North Texas, U.S.A.

  • Master of Science degree in Social Sciences.

  • Designation as a Board Certified Protection Professional (CPP) by ASIS International (Certification #15548).

  • Designation as a Board Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE) by Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE)

    (Certification #607993). 

    Holding the rank of Chief Superintendent 3th Degree at the Turkish National Police. 

Engin Gulen, Sam Houston State University

I have been continuing my doctoral degree at Criminal Justice Program in Sam Houston State University. My interests are criminology theories, behavior of criminals, investigations and criminal justice systems. I have attended interactive classes and workshops. I have also done many research and written several reports. I currently work as Division Chief in Crime Scene Department at Turkish National Police. 

References

Ashley, C., & Oliver, J. (2010). Creative Leaders. Journal of Advertising, 39(1), 115-130.

Barlow, C. (2008). Buddy program links personal trainers to overseas Marines. Independent Tribune (Concord, NC), Retrieved from Newspaper Source database.

Berman, E., & West, J. (2008). Managing Emotional Intelligence in U.S. Cities: A Study of Social Skills among Public Managers. Public Administration Review, 68(4), 742-758. Retrieved from E-Journals database.

Boan, D. (2006). Cognitive-behavior modification and organizational culture. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 58(1), 51-61.

Buckingham, M. (2005). Great Managers Understand Their People. Secured Lender, 61(5), 60.

Davidson, J. (1996). Multi-tasking is fine for computers but bad for people. Public Management (00333611), 78(6), 4.

George, J., & Jones,G. (2007). Understanding and Managing Organizational Behavior. Princeton Hall. 215-218.

Gichuru, P. & Tobin, P.K.J. (2004). Challenges encountered diffusing tacit knowledge at Eli Lilly SA. Peer Reviewed Article, 6 (4).

Gong, Y., Huang, J., & Farh, J. (2009). Employee Learning Orientation, Transformational Leadership, and Employee Creativity: The Meditating Role of Employee Creative Self-Efficacy. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 765-778.

Hembrooke, H. & Gay, G. (2003). The laptop and the lecture: The effects of multitasking in learning environments. Journal of Computing in High Education, 15(1), 46-64.

König, C., Bühner, M., & Mürling, G. (2005). Working Memory, Fluid Intelligence, and Attention Are Predictors of Multitasking Performance, but Polychronicity and Extraversion Are not. Human Performance, 18(3), 243-266.

Levine, T. (2010). Socializing Future Social Studies Teachers and K-12 Students: Whether, When, and Why. Social Studies, 101(2), 69-74.

Lewis, T. (2005). Creativity--A Framework for the Design/Problem Solving Discourse in Technology Education. Journal of Technology Education, 17(1), 35-52.

Lunney, M. (2010). Use of Critical Thinking in the Diagnostic Process. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies & Classifications, 21(2), 82-88.

McGrath, M.E. (2009). Business Decisions. Motivation Publishing. 91-102.

Shapiro, S. M., Lancee, W.J. & Bentley, C.M.R. (2009). Evaluation of a Communication Skills Program for First-Year Medical Students at the University of Toronto. BMC Medical Education, 9(11), 1-8.

Theurer, J., & Schmidt, K. (2008). Coaching Reading Buddies for Success. Reading Teacher, 62(3), 261-264.

Vanderberg, A., & Springle, R. (1998). Nurse/physician collaboration--the "buddy program". Nursing Management, 29(7), 65.

Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. (2010). Linking Empowering Leadership and Employee Creativity: The Influence of Psychological Empowerment, Intrinsic Motivation, and Creative Process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107-128.

Downloads

Published

2015-12-10

How to Cite

Eren, M. E., & Gulen, E. (2015). Cognitive analysis of the (Bingol Anti Terror Police Department) BATPD Buddy Program. Journal of Human Sciences, 12(2), 1612–1625. Retrieved from https://j-humansciences.com/ojs/index.php/IJHS/article/view/3426

Issue

Section

Criminology