Foucault’s analysis of subjectivity and the question of philosophizing with words or things

Authors

  • Senem Öner İstanbul Arel University

Keywords:

Foucault, Subjectivity, Power, Discourse, Problematization

Abstract

This article examines how Foucault analyzes subjectivity within the frame of his approach concerning power and discourse, and the concepts of archaeology and problematization as all discursive and non-discursive practices that constitute the subject and subjective experience. The article investigates the philosophical and political implications occurring as a result of Foucault’s rejection of the idea of natural, ahistorical, founding and constituting subject at the outset and his emphasis on the history of the constitution of subjectivity, i. e. the very historicity and historical singularity of subjective experience. Pursuing an answer to the question whether Foucault philosophizes with words or things, the present study claims that Foucault does not philosophize either by words or things in Durkheimian sense but does so by analyzing discourse as practices forming the object of which they speak systematically.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Senem Öner, İstanbul Arel University

Assist. Prof. Dr., İstanbul Arel University, Faculty of Science and Letters, Department of Translation and Interpreting

References

Durkheim, E. (1958). The Rules of Sociological Method, Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press.

Florence, M. (1994). Foucault, Michel, 1926-. The Cambridge Companion to Foucault, (ed.) G. Gutting, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Foucault, M. (2000). Hakikat Kaygısı. Özne ve İktidar. Michel Foucault. Seçme Yazılar 2, (ed.) F. Keskin, (trans.) I. Ergüden and O. Akınhay, İstanbul: Ayrıntı.

------------ (2000), The Subject and Power. Power: Essential Works of Foucault, 1954-1984, Vol. 3, (ed.) J. D. Faubion, New York: The New Press.

------------ (1997). The Archaeology of Knowledge, London: Routledge.

------------ (1994). Preface to the History of Sexuality. Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth, Essential Works of Foucault, Vol. 1, (ed.) P. Rabinow, New York: The New Press, p. 200.

------------ (1986) Questions of Method: An Interview with Michel Foucault. After Philosophy: End or Transformation?, (eds.) K. Baynes, J. Bohman and T. McCarthy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

------------ (1986). The Use of Pleasure: History of Sexuality, Vol. 2, New York: Vintage.

Keskin, F. (2000). Özne ve İktidar. Özne ve İktidar. Michel Foucault. Seçme Yazılar 2, (ed.) F. Keskin, (trans.) I. Ergüden and O. Akınhay, İstanbul: Ayrıntı.

Urhan, V. (2000). Michel Foucault ve Arkeolojik Çözümleme, İstanbul: Paradigma.

Downloads

Published

2016-01-19

How to Cite

Öner, S. (2016). Foucault’s analysis of subjectivity and the question of philosophizing with words or things. Journal of Human Sciences, 13(1), 479–486. Retrieved from https://j-humansciences.com/ojs/index.php/IJHS/article/view/3493

Issue

Vol. 13 No. 1 (2016)

Section

Philosophy

License

Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi ISSN:1303-5134
International Journal of Human Sciences ISSN:2458-9489
 
is an "Open Access Journal" that uses a funding model that does not charge readers or their institutions for access. From the BOAI definition of open access, users take the right of read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles.

Authors can retain copyright, while granting the journal right of first publication. Alternatively, authors can transfer copyright to the journal, which then permits authors non-commercial use of the work, including the right to place it in an open access archive. In addition, Creative Commons can be consulted for flexible copyright licenses.

©1999 Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.