Sexism: Ambivalence toward men

Authors

  • Sezer Ayan Cumhuriyet University,

Keywords:

Sexism, Ambivalent Sexism, Hostile and Benevolent Sexism

Abstract

Objective. The objective of the study is to test the Ambivalence toward Men Inventory (AMI) that is developed for the purpose of estimating the ambivalence of women towards men on the basis of Ambivalent Sexism.

Method. The sample consists of 421 university students. A survey questionnaire was used in the research in order to determine the socio-demographic properties of the participants, and AMI was used in order to measure their social sexism tendencies.

Findings. The general average of AMI is 4,22; and it was seen that men and women have ambivalence above the average towards each other. By gender, there is a significant difference between hostile attitudes towards men (HM) (t(421)=-15,33 p<0,05), and benevolent attitudes towards men (BM) (t(421)=-5,18 p<0,05). Sub-factor correlations showed that there is a significant relationship between HM and BM. In contrast with women, encountering a significant relationship between only maternity and compensatory gender differentiation in men showed that women’s domestic responsibilities and maturity are determinative in the development of benevolent behaviours in men towards women.

Discussion. The positive relationship observed between HM and BM in AMI shows that women participants resist the male-dominant system on the one hand, while they also have the tendency to justify and support this system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Sezer Ayan, Cumhuriyet University,

Assoc. Prof., Cumhuriyet University, Faculty of Letters, Department of Sociology, Sivas

References

Allport, G. W. (1954). The Nature of Prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1997). Hostile and Benevolent Sexism: Measuring Ambivalent Sexist Attitudes Toward Women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(1), 119-135. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00104.x

Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1999). The Ambivalence Toward Men Inventory: Differentiating Hostile and Benevolent Beliefs About Men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23(3), 519-536. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00379.x

Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance. Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. Am Psychol, 56(2), 109-118.

McIntire, S. A., & Miller, L. A. (2000). Foundation of Psychological Testing. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.

Sakallı Uğurlu, N. (2001). Turkish Adaptation of the Ambivalence toward Men Inventory. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 11(21), 01-11.

Tajfel, H. (1981). Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. London, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

2016-03-11

How to Cite

Ayan, S. (2016). Sexism: Ambivalence toward men. Journal of Human Sciences, 13(1), 1452–1459. Retrieved from https://j-humansciences.com/ojs/index.php/IJHS/article/view/3636

Issue

Vol. 13 No. 1 (2016)

Section

Sociology

License

Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi ISSN:1303-5134
International Journal of Human Sciences ISSN:2458-9489
 
is an "Open Access Journal" that uses a funding model that does not charge readers or their institutions for access. From the BOAI definition of open access, users take the right of read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles.

Authors can retain copyright, while granting the journal right of first publication. Alternatively, authors can transfer copyright to the journal, which then permits authors non-commercial use of the work, including the right to place it in an open access archive. In addition, Creative Commons can be consulted for flexible copyright licenses.

©1999 Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.