Examination of Routine Activities Theory by the property crime

Authors

  • Uğur Argun Turkish National Police
  • Murat Dağlar Turkish National Police

Keywords:

Crime Prevention, Routine Activities Theory, Property Crime, Burglary, Auto Theft

Abstract

The studies on crime prevention, causes of crime and the theories associated with it are very essential topics in criminology. Routine Activities Theory (RAT) is also the basis for the many criminological theories. Although it has some shortcomings it is very usual that the theorists and practitioners on crime prevention can benefit from such a strong theory. This study explains the applicability of Routine Activities Theory in prevention and reducing of property crimes in the context of some parameters related to burglary and auto theft incidents in US. The study aims to give some information of the routine activity theory and investigate its relationship with prevention of property crimes. The results of study suggest that Routine Activity Theory may be used as a useful tool by crime reduction or prevention practitioners to evaluate crime problems and also take routine precautions and measures that reduce crime opportunities in people’s daily activities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Uğur Argun, Turkish National Police

Ph.D., Vice Director of Etimesgut Police Department, Ankara 4th Degree Police Chief

Murat Dağlar, Turkish National Police

Ph.D., 3th Degree Police Chief in Nigde Police Department 

References

Bahar, H. I. and Fert, I. (2008). The Debate over Recent Recorded Crime Rate in Turkey”, International Journal of Social Inquiry, Vol.1, No: 1:89-104.

Brunet, J. R. (2002). “Discouragement of Crime Through Civil Remedies: An Application of a Reformulated Routine Activities Theory”, Western Criminology Review 4 (1): 68-79.

Buikhuisen, W., Bontekoe, E. H. M., Plas-Korenhoff, C., & Van Buuren, S. (1984). Characteristics of criminals: The privileged offender. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 7(3), 301-313, Retrieved March 25, 2015. (http://www.stefvanbuuren.nl/publications/Characteristics%20-%20Int%20J%20Law%20Psych%201984.pdf)

Clarke, Ronald V. (1997). Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies. Second ed. Guilderland, NY: Harrow and Heston.

Clarke, R.V. and Cornish, D. B. (1985). Modeling Offenders’ Decisions: A Framework for Research and Policy. In: M. Tonry and N. Morris (eds.) Crime and Justice, Volume Number: 6.

Clarke, R.V., and P.M. Harris. (1992). Auto Theft and Its Prevention. In: M. Tonry and N. Morris (eds.) Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, Vol. 16. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Cohen, Lawrence and Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review 44, 588-608.

Cornish, D., and R. Clarke. (1987). Understanding crime displacement: An application of rational choice theory. Criminology, 25(4), 933–947.

Cromwell, P., Olson, J. and Avary, D. (1991). Breaking and Entering: An Ethnographic Analysis of Burglary. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Degarmo, M. (2011). Understanding the Comparisons of Routine Activities and Contagious Distributions of Victimization: Forming a Mixed Model of Confluence and Transmission”, International Journal of Criminology and Sociological Theory, Vol. 4, No. 1, 584-603.

Dolu, Osman. (2009a). Crime as a Function of Opportunity: Situational Determinants of Crime, Crime Opportunities and Routine Activities Theory, Turkish Journal of Police Studies, 11 (2): 1-30.

Dolu, Osman. (2009b). Crime as a Rational Choice: An Evaluation of the Capacity of Classical School of Criminology in Explaining and Preventing Crime. Turkish Journal of Police Studies Vol: 11 (4): 89-120.

Dolu, Osman. (2010). Suç Teorileri: Teori, Araştırma ve Uygulamada Kriminoloji, Ankara, Seçkin Yay.

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), (2003). Crime in the United States, 2002. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), (2004). Crime in the United States, 2003. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). (2012). Uniform Crime Reports as prepared by the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data, US Department of Justice, Retrieved January 21, 2014, (http://www.ucrdatatool.gov/Search/Crime/State/RunCrimeStatebyState.cfm)

Felson, M. (1994). Crime and Everyday Life. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press. Hakim, S. (1995). Securing Suburban Homes: The Greenwich Case. Bethesda, Maryland: Alarm Industry Research and Education Foundation.

Hollis-Peel, M. E., Reynald, D. M., Bavel, M., Elffers, H. and Welsh, B. C. (2011). Guardianship for Crime Prevention: A Critical Review of the Literature. In: Crime, Law and Social Change 56, 1, pp. 53-70.

Lindsay, B. and McGillis D. (1986). Citywide Community Crime Prevention: An Assessment of the Seattle Program. in Dennis P. Rosenbaum (ed.). Community Crime Prevention: Does it Work? Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

NSW Attorney General. (2011). Routine Activity Theory; Crime Prevention. Retrieved November 13, 2015 from New South Whales Attorney General and Justice: (http://www.crimeprevention.nsw.gov.au/agdbasev7wr/_assets/cpd/m660001l2/routineactivityfactsheet_nov2011.pdf.)

Pease, K. (1992). Preventing Burglary on a British Public Housing Estate. In Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies (First Edition), edited by Ronald V. Clarke. Albany, NY: Harrow and Heston.

Phillips, T. (1995). State Differences in Burglary Victimization in Australia: An Exploratory Analysis. In Crime Victims Surveys in Australia: Conference Proceedings Brisbane: Criminal Justice Commission.

Poyner, B. (1997). Situational Crime Prevention in Two Parking Facilities. In Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies (Second Edition), ed Ronald V. Clarke. Albany, NY: Harrow and Heston.

Prenzler, T. and Townsley, M. (1998). The Prospects for Burglary Prevention in Australia, Current Issues in Criminal Justice, Vol:9, No:3, pp.294-311.

Sargın S. ve Temurçin, K. (2011). Türkiye’nin Suç Coğrafyası. Ankara: Polis Akademisi Yayınları.

Sherman, L.W., P.R. Gartin and Buerger, M. E. (1989). Hot Spots of Predatory Crime: Routine Activities and Criminology of Place, Criminology, (4), 1, pp. 27-56

Taylor, I. (1995). Private Homes and Public Others. British Journal of Criminology, 35/2:263-85.

U.S. Department of Justice. (2012). Property Crime, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrived January 23, 2014 (http://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=tp&tid=32#terms_def)

Walker, J. and Dagger, D. (1993). Crime in Australia. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.

Wilcox, Pamela, Kenneth C. Land, and Scott Hunt. (2003). Criminal Circumstance: A Dynamic Multicontextual Criminal Opportunity Theory. New York: Walter de Gruyter.

Wilcox, P., Madensen, T. D. and Tillyer, M. S.. (2007). Guardianship in Context: Implications for Burglary Victimization Risk & Prevention. Criminology, 45 (4):771-803.

Downloads

Published

2016-02-29

How to Cite

Argun, U., & Dağlar, M. (2016). Examination of Routine Activities Theory by the property crime. Journal of Human Sciences, 13(1), 1188–1198. Retrieved from https://j-humansciences.com/ojs/index.php/IJHS/article/view/3665

Issue

Section

Criminology