Teacher satisfaction at the educational placement of students with special educational needs
Keywords:
School Sociology, Special Education, Referral to Special Education, Teacher Satisfaction, FinlandAbstract
This study conducted a large-scale survey to investigate the satisfaction of Finnish primary school teachers toward the current educational placement of their students with special educational needs (SEN). Teachers were asked to recommend the most suitable educational placement for each of their SEN students from a pool of six alternatives: a mainstream classroom, part-time special education, a special classroom in the mainstream school, a special school, a state special school, or an institution. Data were obtained from 980 students representing 68 schools. The results showed that, in the majority of cases, teachers recommended a different level to the current level of placement for their SEN students. Teachers in the mainstream classrooms mostly recommended special classrooms, while teachers of the special education classrooms frequently recommended special schools, and teachers of the special schools often recommended state special schools or special education classrooms. A less restrictive environment was recommended for 20% and a more restrictive environment was recommended for 33% of the students. The results are interpreted in terms of organizational selection.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Algozzine, B., & Ysseldyke, J. (1983). Learning disabilities as a subset of school failure: The over-sophistication of a concept. Exceptional Children, 50, 242–246.
Avramidis, E., & Norwich, B. (2002). Teachers’ attitudes towards integration/inclusion: A review of the literature. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 17, 129–147.
Basic Education Act of 1998, 628 §§ 1–56 (2003). Retrieved from http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/ajantasa/1998/19980628?search%5Btype%5D=pika&search%5Bpika%5D=perusopetuslaki
Bowman, I. (1986). Teacher training and the integration of handicapped pupils: Some findings from a fourteen nation UNESCO Study. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 1, 29–38.
Crockett, J. B., & Kauffman, J. M. (1999). The least restrictive environment: Its origins and interpretations in special education. London: Lawrence Earlbaum.
de Boer, A., Pijl, S. J., & Minnaert, A. (2011). Regular primary schoolteachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education: A review of the literature. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15, 331–53.View article: DOI: 10.1080/13603110903030089
Etzioni, A. (1964). Modern organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Forlin, C. (1995). Educators’ beliefs about inclusive practices in Western Australia. British Journal of Special Education, 22, 179–185.
Government Decree Amending the Regulation on the Eligibility Criteria for Teaching, 105 §§ 8–17 (2012). Retrieved from http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/alkup/2012/20120105
Hallahan, D. P., & Kauffman, J. M. (1977). Labels, categories, behaviors: ED, LD, and EMR reconsidered. The Journal of Special Education, 11, 139–149.
Horner, R. H., Sugai, G., Todd, A. W., & Lewis-Palmer, T. (2005). Schoolwide positive behaviour support. In L. M. Bambara & L. Kern (Eds.), Individualized supports for students with problem behaviours (pp. 359–390). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Kivinen, O., & Kivirauma, J. (1988) Classification, selection and schooling. Special education in the Finnish school system in the 20th century. Sociological Studies Series A No. 13. Turku: University of Turku.
Meijer, J. W. (Ed.). (1999). Financing of special needs education: A seventeen country study of the relation between financing of special needs education and integration. Middelfart, Denmark: European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education.
Moberg, S. (2003). Education for all in the north and the south: Teachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education in Finland and Zambia. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 417–428.
Reschly, D. J., Tilly, W. D., & Grimes, J. P. (1998). Functional and noncategorical identification and intervention in special education. Iowa State Department of Education (ED 434454). Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED434454
Reynolds, M. C. (1962). A framework for considering some issues in special education. Exceptional Children, 28, 367–370.
Sabornie, E. J., Cullinan, D., Osborne, S. S., & Brock, L. B. (2005). Intellectual, academic, and behavioural functioning of students with high-incidence disabilities: A cross-categorical meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 72, 47–63.
Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1996). Teacher perceptions of mainstreaming/inclusion, 1958–1995: A research synthesis. Exceptional Children, 63, 59–74.
Skrtic, T. M. (1991). Behind special education. Critical analysis of professional culture and school organization. Denver, CO: Love Publishing.
Ysseldyke, J. E. (1987). Classification of handicapped students. In M. C. Wang, M. C. Reynolds & H. J. Walberg (Eds.). Handbook of special education: Research and practice, Vol 1, Learner characteristics and adaptive education (pp. 253–271). Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors can retain copyright, while granting the journal right of first publication. Alternatively, authors can transfer copyright to the journal, which then permits authors non-commercial use of the work, including the right to place it in an open access archive. In addition, Creative Commons can be consulted for flexible copyright licenses.
©1999 Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
