Examining of leisure time participation, psychological well-being and leisure negotiation of university students<p>Serbest zaman katılımı, psikolojik iyi olma ve serbest zaman engelleri ile baş etme stratejilerinin üniversite öğrencileri üzerinde incelenmesi
Keywords:
Psychological Well-Being, Leisure Time Exercise, Leisure Negotiation Strategies, University Students, Psikolojik İyi Olma, Serbest Zaman Egzersizi, Serbest Zaman Engelleri ile Baş Etme Stratejileri, Üniversite ÖğrencileriAbstract
The aim of this study is to determine whether psychological well-being statuses of university students according to their genders, their leisure negotiation strategies and their leisure exercise participation have been differentiated or not and detect the relationship between psychological well-being, leisure negotiation strategies and leisure activities participation of students. Sample of the study consisted of 400 female and 400 male making 800 students at total. As data collection tool in the study was used Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire, Psychological well- being scales and Leisure Negotiation Scale. Mann-Whitney U test was used with the purpose of identifying difference, Pearson product–moment and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was used for correlation in the study. Consequently, psychological well-being of students shows positive linear relationship with both leisure negotiation strategies and leisure exercise participations. While psychological well-being statutes of students and leisure exercise participations show significant difference with respect their genders, leisure negotiation strategies do not. According to these results, while psychological well-being of females is higher, leisure exercise participations are lower with respect to males.
Özet
Bu araştırmanın amacı; üniversite öğrencilerinin cinsiyetlerine göre psikolojik iyi olma durumlarının, serbest zaman engelleriyle baş etme stratejilerinin ve serbest zaman egzersiz katılımlarının farklılaşıp farklılaşmadığını tespit etmek ve öğrencilerin psikolojik iyi olma durumlarının, serbest zaman engelleriyle baş etme stratejileri ve serbest zaman egzersiz katılımları ile ilişkisini saptamaya yöneliktir. Araştırmanın örneklemini 400 kadın, 400 erkek toplam 800 öğrenci oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak; Serbest Zaman Egzersiz Anketi, Psikolojik İyi Olma Ölçekleri ve Serbest Zaman Engelleri ile Baş Etme Stratejileri Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Araştırmada farklılığı tespit etmek amacıyla Mann-Whitney U testi, korelasyon için Pearson çarpım-moment ve Spearman'ın sıralama korelasyon katsayıları kullanılmıştır. Sonuç olarak; öğrencilerin psikolojik iyi olma durumları serbest zaman engelleriyle baş etme stratejileri ve serbest zaman egzersiz katılımlarıyla pozitif doğrusal yönde ilişki göstermektedir. Cinsiyetlerine göre psikolojik iyi olma durumları ve serbest zaman egzersizine katılımları anlamlı farklılık gösterirken, serbest zaman engelleriyle baş etme stratejileri farklılık göstermemektedir. Buna göre; kadınların psikolojik iyi olma durumları daha yüksek iken serbest zaman egzersiz katılımları erkeklere göre daha düşüktür.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Akın, A. (2008). The scales of psychological well-being: A study of validity and reliability. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 8 (3), 741-750.
Beggs, B.A., Elkins, D.J. & Powers, S. (2005). Overcoming barriers to participation in campus recreational sports. Recreational Sports Journal, 29 (2), 143-155.
Bradburn, N. (1969). The Structure of Psychological Well-Being. Chicago: Aldine.
Burns, R.A. & Machin, M.A. (2010). ıdentifying gender differences in the independent effects of personality and psychological well-being on two broad affect components of subjective well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 48 (1), 22–27.
Crawford, D.W., Jackson, E.L. & Godbey, G. (1991). A hierarchical model of leisure constraints. Leisure Sciences, 13 (4), 309-320.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harpercollins.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2009). The promise of positive psychology. Psychological Topics, 18 (2), 203-21.
Edginton, C.R., Jordan, D.J., DeGraaf, D.G. & Edginton, S.R. (1995). Leisure and Life Satisfaction: Foundational Perspectives. Dubuque, IA: Brown and Benchmark.
Edwards, S.D,. Ngcobo, H.S.B., Edwards D.J. & Palavar K. (2005). Exploring the relationship between physical activity, psychological well- being and physical self-perception in different exercise groups. South African Journal for Research in Sport, Physical Education and Recreation, 27 (1), 75-90.
Elkins, D. J. (2004). Levels of perceived constraint: a comparative analysis of negotiation strategies in campus recreational sports. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation), Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.
Eşigül, E. (2013). Üniversite öğrencilerinin algıladıkları stres ile psikolojik iyi olma arasındaki ilişkide sosyal problem çözmenin aracı ve düzenleyici rolünün incelenmesi. (Yayınlamamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Adana: Çukurova Üniversitesi.
Gauvin, L. & Spence, J. C. (1996). Physical activity and psychological well-being: Knowledge base, current issues, and caveats. Nutrition Reviews, 54 (4), 53-67.
Godin, G. & Shephard, R. J. (1985). A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Science, 10 (3), 141-146.
Henderson, K.A. & Bialeschki, M.D. (1993). Exploring an expanded model of womenʼs leisure constraints. Journal of Applied Recreation Research, 18 (4), 229-252.
Hubbard, J. & Mannell, R.C. (2001). Testing competing models of the leisure constraint negotiation process in a corporate employee recreation setting. Leisure Sciences, 23 (3), 145-163.
Hung, H. & Lee, C.W. (2013). Relationsship between ethnic backgrounds, family socioeconamic status, leisure participation, and psychological well- being. Perceptual and Motor Skills: Exercise & Sport, 117 (2), 367-375.
Iwasaki, Y., Bryan J. & Smale, B. (1998). Longitudinal analyses of the relationship among life transitions, chronic health problems, leisure and psychological well-being. Leisure Sciences, 20 (1), 25-52.
Jackson, E.L (1991). Special issue introduction: Leisure constraints/constrained leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 23 (4), 279-285.
Jackson, E.L. (1997). In the eye of the beholder: A comment on Samdahl and Jekuvobich (1997), "A critique of leisure constraints: Comparative analyses and understandings". Journal of Leisure Research, 29 (4): 458-468.
Jackson, E.L., Crawford, D.W. & Godbey, G. (1993). Negotiation of leisure constraints. Leisure Sciences, 15 (1), 1–11.
Jackson, E.L. & Rucks, V.C. (1995). Negotiation of leisure constraints by junior-high and high-school students: An exploratory study. Journal of Leisure Research, 27 (1), 85-105.
Karabeyeser, M. (2013). Üniversite öğrencilerinin anne-baba tutumları ve stresli yaşam olaylarına göre psikolojik iyi oluşu. (Yayınlamamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi.
Little, D.E. (2000). Negotiating adventure recreation: how women can access satisfying adventure experiences throughout their lives. Loisir et Societe, 23 (1), 171-195.
Lloyd K. & Little D.E. (2010).Self-determination theory as a framework for understanding women's psychological well-being outcomes from leisure-time physical activity. Leisure Sciences, 32 (4), 369-385.
Ma, S.M., Tan, Y. & Ma, S.C. (2012). Testing a structural model of psychological well-being, leisure negotiation, and leisure participation with Taiwanese college students. Leisure Sciences, 34 (1), 55–71.
Mannell, R. (2007). Leisure, health and well-being. World Leisure Journal, 49 (3), 114-128.
Ryff, C.D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57 (6), 1069-1081.
Ryff, C.D. (1999). The Self and Society in Aging Processes. V. W. Marshall (Ed.), Forging Macro-Micro Link ages in the Study of Psychological Well-Being (247-278). New York: Springer Publishing Company.
Ryff, C.D. & Singer, H.B. (1996). Psychological well-being: Meaning, measurement and implications for psychotherapy research. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 65 (1), 14-23.
Samdahl, D.M. & Jekubovich, N.J. (1997). A critique of leisure constraints: Comparative analyses and understandings. Journal of Leisure Research, 29 (4), 430-452.
Sarıcaoğlu, H. (2011). Üniversite öğrencilerinin psikolojik iyi olma düzeylerinin kişilik özellikleri ve öz-anlayış açısından incelenmesi. (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Konya: Selçuk Üniversitesi.
Scott, D. (1991). The problematic nature of participation in contract bridge: A qualitative study of group-related constraints. Leisure Sciences, 13 (4), 321-336.
Searle, M.S., Mahon, M.J., Iso-Aloha, S.E., Sdrolias, H.A. & Dyck, J. (1998). Examining the long term effects of leisure education on a sense of independence and psychological well-being among the elderly. Journal of Leisure Research, 30 (3), 331-340.
Yerlisu Lapa T. & Yağar G. (2015). Serbest Zaman Egzersiz Anketinin Türkçe Geçerlik Güvenirlik Çalışması,2.Uluslararası Spor Bilimleri, Turizm ve Rekreasyon Öğrenci Kongresi, 28-30 Mayıs 2015, Afyon-Türkiye.
Yerlisu-Lapa, T. (2014). Leisure negotiation strategies scale: A study of validity and reliability for university students. South African Journal for Research in Sport, Physical Education and Recreation, 36 (3), 201-215.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors can retain copyright, while granting the journal right of first publication. Alternatively, authors can transfer copyright to the journal, which then permits authors non-commercial use of the work, including the right to place it in an open access archive. In addition, Creative Commons can be consulted for flexible copyright licenses.
©1999 Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
