Explaining destination choices based upon recreational opportunities through ıntrinsic and extrinsic travel motivations<p>Rekreasyonel olanaklara dayalı yapılan destinasyon tercihlerinin içsel ve dışsal seyahat motivasyonlarıyla açıklanması

Authors

  • Ali Selman Özdemir Bülent Ecevit Üniversitesi
  • Şener Büyüköztürk Prof. Dr., Gaziantep Hasan Kalyoncu Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Bölümü,
  • Suat Karaküçük Gazi Üniversitesi

Keywords:

Boş Zaman, Leisure, Rekreasyon, Recreation, Turizm, Tourism, Motivasyon, Motivation, Destinasyon Tercihi, Destination Choice

Abstract

The aim of this study was to explain of destination choices based upon recreational opportunities through intrinsic and extrinsic travel motivations. 700 students constitute the sample group from the universities of the city of Ankara. The data collection tool “Scale of Recreational Activities in Destination Choices” (SRADC), “Scale of Intrinsic Travel Motivations” (SITM) and “Scale of Extrinsic Travel Motivations” (SETM) which had been developed by the researcher himself and whose validity and reliability had been confirmed, were used. “Hierarchical Multiple Linear Regression Analysis” and “Multivariate ANOVA Analysis” were used in the analysis of data. According to research results, attaching importance on recreational activities while making destination preferences can be explained by intrinsic and extrinsic travel motivations. It was understood that while university students were making destination preferences, intrinsic travel motivations were primarily effective in placing importance on recreational activities. With respect to significance level, students, whose “travel bragging-prestige”, “exploring-knowledge”, “visiting friends and relatives” and “escape” motivations were high, gave much importance to recreational activities in their destination preferences. While attaching importance to recreational activities, extrinsic travel motivations presented a secondary significance in due course of university students’ destination preferences. Hereunder, “culture and historic heritage”, “natural environment” and “popularity” motivations are important at a significant level. Considering the other results attained at the research, it was seen that female students gave importance to recreational activities relatively more than male students, students at state universities gave more importance to recreational activities than the ones at private universities.

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı, rekreasyonel olanaklara dayalı yapılan destinasyon tercihlerinin motivasyonel ve demografik faktörler yoluyla açıklanmasıdır. Örneklem grubunu Ankara ilinde farklı üniversitelerde öğrenim gören 700 öğrenci oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak araştırmacı tarafından geliştirilen ve geçerlik güvenirliği yapılan “Destinasyon Tercihinde Rekreasyonel Aktiviteler Ölçeği” (DTRAÖ), “İçsel Seyahat Motivasyonları Ölçeği” (İSMÖ) ve “Dışsal Seyahat Motivasyonları Ölçeği” (DSMÖ) kullanılmıştır. Verilerin analizinde “Hiyerarşik Çoklu Doğrusal Regresyon Analizi” ve “Çok Değişkenli ANOVA” analizleri kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonuçları, destinasyon tercihi yaparken rekreasyonel aktivitelere önem verilmesinin içsel ve dışsal seyahat motivasyonları yoluyla açıklanabildiğini göstermektedir. Destinasyon tercihinde rekreasyonel aktivitelere verilen önemin açıklanmasında içsel seyahat motivasyonlarının baskın etken olduğu görülmüştür. Anlamlılık düzeyine göre sırasıyla “hareket”, “görgü-keşif”, “ziyaret” ve “uzaklaşma” motivasyonları yüksek olan öğrenciler destinasyon tercihinde rekreasyonel aktivitelere daha fazla önem vermektedir. Dışsal seyahat motivasyonları bu anlamda ikincil önem arz etmektedir. Buna göre “kültürel zenginlik”, “doğal zenginlik” ve “popülarite” motivasyonları anlamlı düzeyde önemlidir. Araştırmada elde edilen diğer sonuçlar; kadın öğrencilerin erkek öğrencilere, devlet üniversitesi öğrencilerinin vakıf üniversitesi öğrencilerine göre destinasyon tercihinde rekreasyonel aktivitelere daha fazla önem verdiği görülmüştür.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Ali Selman Özdemir, Bülent Ecevit Üniversitesi

Yard. Doc. Dr., Bülent Ecevit Üniversitesi, Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Yüksek Okulu, Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Öğretmenliği Bolumu,

Şener Büyüköztürk, Prof. Dr., Gaziantep Hasan Kalyoncu Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Bölümü,

Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi

Suat Karaküçük, Gazi Üniversitesi

Prof. Dr., Gazi Üniversitesi, Spor Bilimleri Fakültesi, Rekreasyon Bölümü,

References

Bieger, T. ve Laesser, C. (2002). Market Segmentation by Motivation: The Case of Switzerland, Journal of Travel Research, 41 (1): 68-76.

Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E.K., Akgün, Ö.E., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2010). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. 7. Baskı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

Chang, S. (2009). Relationship Between Active Leisure and Active Vacations (Doctor of Philosophy). Florida: University of Florida.

Cordes, K.A. (2013). Applications in Recreation&Leisure: For Today and The Future. 4th ed. Urbana, IL: Sagamore Publishing.

Crompton, J.L. (1979). Motivations for Pleasure Vacation, Annals of Tourism Research, 6 (4): 408-424.

Cullen, D. (1997). Maslow, Monkeys and Motivation Theory, Organization, 4 (3): 355-373.

Dann, G. (1981). Tourist Motivation: An Appraisal, Annals of Tourism Research, 8 (2): 187-219.

Dann, G. (1977). Anomie, Ego-Enhancement and Tourism, Annals of Tourism Research, 4 (4): 184-194.

Dotson, M.J., Clark, J.D., ve Dave, D.S. (2008). Travel Motivations and Destination Activities of Young Travelers of Different Ages: An Empirical Study in the United States, International Journal of Management, 25 (4): 665-672.

Gunn, C.A. (1972). Vacationscape: Designing Tourist Regions. University of Texas, Austin: Bureau of Business Research.

Harrill, R. ve Potts, T.D. (2002). Social Psychological Theories of Tourist Motivation: Exploration, Debate and Transition, Tourism Analysis, 7 (2): 105-114.

Heung, V.C.S., Qu, H. ve Chu, R. (2001). The Relationship Between Vacation Factors and Socio-Demographic and Travelling Characteristics: The Case of Japanese Leisure Travellers, Tourism Management, 22 (2001): 259-269.

Iso-Ahola, S. (1983). Towards a Social Psychology of Recreational Travel. Leisure Studies, 2 (1): 45-56.

Jang, S.C. ve Cai, L.A. (2002). Travel Motivations and Destination Choice: A Study of British Outbound Market, Journal of Travel&Tourism Marketing, 13 (3): 111-133.

Josiam, B.M., Smeaton, G. ve Clements, C.J. (1999). Involvement: Travel Motivation and Destination Selection, Journal of Vacation Marketing, 5 (2): 167-175.

Kaplan, R. ve Kaplan, S. (1989). The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Pres.

Kim, K., Oh, K.I. ve Jogaratnam, G. (2007). College Student Travel: A Revised Model Of Push Motives, Journal of Vacation Marketing, 13(1): 73-85.

Kim, K. (2006). Travel Behaviors of U.S. University Students: Travel Involvement, Push Motivations, Pull Motivations, Satisfaction and Destination Loyalty (Doctor of Philosophy). Michigan: Michigan State University.

Kozak, M. (2002). Comparative Analysis of Tourist Motivations by Nationality and Destinations, Tourism Management, 23 (3): 221–232.

Lang, C.T. ve O'Leary, J.T. (1997). Motivation, Participation, and Preference: A Multi-Segmentation Approach of the Australian Nature Travel Market, Journal of Travel&Tourism Marketing, 6 (3-4): 159-180.

Loker-Murphy, L. (1996). Backpackers in Australia: A Motivation-Based Segmentation Study, Journal of Travel&Tourism Marketing, 5 (4): 23-45.

Mansfeld, Y. (1992). From Motivation to Actual Travel, Annals of Tourism Research, 19 (3): 399-419.

Maslow, A.H. (1970). Motivation and Personality. 2nd ed. New York: Harper and Row.

Mayo, E. (1975). Tourism and The National Parks: A Psychographic and Attitudinal Study, Journal of Travel Research, 4 (1): 14-18.

Meisel, C. ve Cottrell, S. (2003). Differences in Motivations and Expectations of Divers in The Florida Keys, In: Murdy J. editor. Proceedings of the Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium. Newtown Square PA: 393-401.

Mieczkowski, Z. (1990). World Trends in Tourism and Recreation. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

Moscardo, G., Morrison, A.M., Pearce, P.L., Lang, C.T. ve O'Leary, J.T. (1996). Understanding Vacation Destination Choice Through Travel Motivation and Activities, Journal of Vacation Marketing, 2 (2): 109-122.

Murray, E.J. (1964). Motivation and Emotion. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Neher, A. (1991). Maslow’s Theory of Motivation: A Critique, Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 31 (3): 89-112.

Norling, J.C. ve Sibthorp, J. (2006). Research Update: Mental Restoration and Recreation, Parks&Recreation, 41 (3): 30-37.

Özdemir, A.S. (2013). Motivasyonel ve Demografik Faktörlerin Rekreasyonel Olanaklara Dayalı Yapılan Destinasyon Tercihleri Üzerine Etkisi (Basılmamış Doktora Tezi). Ankara: Gazi Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü.

Parrinello, G.L. (1993). Motivation and Anticipation in Post-Industrial Tourism, Annals of Tourism Research, 20 (2): 233-249.

Pearce, P.L. ve Lee, U. (2005). Developing The Travel Career Approach to Tourist Motivation, Journal of Travel Research, 43 (3): 226-237.

Perrett, C. (2007). Travel Motivation of Independent Youth Leisure Travellers (Master of Arts). Wellington, Canada: The University of Manitoba.

Prideaux, B. ve Crosswell, M. (2006). The Value of Visitor Surveys: The Case of Norfolk Island, Journal of Vacation Marketing, 12 (4): 359-370.

Richards, G. ve Wilson, J. (2003). New Horizons in Independent Youth and Student Travel. 2nd edt. A Report for the International Student Travel Confederation (ISTC) and the Association of Tourism and Leisure Education (ATLAS). Amsterdam: International Student Travel Confederation (ISTC).

Ross, G.F. (1993). Ideal and Actual Images of Backpaper Visitors to Northern Australia, Journal of Travel Research, 21 (3): 54-57.

Ryan, C. ve Glendon, I. (1998). Application of Leisure Motivation Scale to Tourism, Annals of Tourism Research, 25 (1): 169-184.

Schott, C. (2004). Young Holidaymakers: Solely Faithful to Hedonism? In: Smith K.A., Schott, C. editors. Proceedings of the New Zealand Tourism and Hospitality Research Conference. Wellington New Zealand: 364-376.

Sırakaya, E. ve McLellan, R.W. (1997). Factors Affecting Vacation Destination Choices of College Students, Anatolia: An International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, 8 (3): 31-44.

Snepenger, D., King, J., Marshall, E. ve Uysal, M. (2006). Modeling Iso-Ahola’s Motivation Theory in the Tourism Context, Journal of Travel Research, 45 (2): 140-149.

Tübitak, (2003). Vizyon 2023 Projesi: Ulaştırma ve Turizm Paneli Raporu. Ankara: 19-28.

Uysal, M. ve Jurowski, C. (1994). Testing the Push and Pull Factors, Annals of Tourism Research, 21 (4): 844-846.

You, X., O'Leary, J.T., Morrison, A. ve Hong, G.S. (2000). A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Travel Push and Pull Factors, International Journal of Hospitality&Tourism Administration, 1 (2): 1-26.

Yuan, S. ve McDonald, C. (1990). Motivational Determinates of International Pleasure Time, Journal of Travel Research, 29 (1): 42-44.

Downloads

Published

2016-07-18

How to Cite

Özdemir, A. S., Büyüköztürk, Şener, & Karaküçük, S. (2016). Explaining destination choices based upon recreational opportunities through ıntrinsic and extrinsic travel motivations&lt;p&gt;Rekreasyonel olanaklara dayalı yapılan destinasyon tercihlerinin içsel ve dışsal seyahat motivasyonlarıyla açıklanması. Journal of Human Sciences, 13(2), 3002–3021. Retrieved from https://j-humansciences.com/ojs/index.php/IJHS/article/view/3920

Issue

Section

Physical Education and Sport Sciences