The importance of the quality of coach–athlete relationship for athletes’ motivation<p>Antrenör sporcu ilişkisinin sporcuların güdülenmesi için önemi
Keywords:
Coach–athlete Relationship, Motivation, Athletes, Antrenör Sporcu İlişkisi, Güdülenme, SporcuAbstract
The aim of this research was to reveal whether the coach-athlete relationship is a determinant of athletes’ motivation. 312 (63.5%) males and 179 (36.5%) females as a total of 491 athletes from team and individual sports voluntarily participated to the research. Mean age of the participants’ was found to be 19.11±2.70. The Coach–Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (CART-Q) and Sports Motivation Scale (SMS) were used as the data collection tools. For the data analyses; descriptive statistics, Pearson’s correlation and multiple regression analyses (enter method) were used. Level of significance was determined to be .05. The results showed that intrinsic motivation was significantly correlated with closeness (r = .235), commitment (r = .240) and complementary (r = .153). Also, extrinsic motivation was significantly correlated with closeness (r = .346), commitment (r = .307) and complementary (r = .270). The results of the regression analysis revealed that closeness (β = .197, p = .009) and commitment (β = .197, p = .006) were the significant predictors of intrinsic motivation [F (3, 487) = 12.539, p = .000, R2=.07] and that extrinsic motivation was significantly predicted by closeness (β = .283, p = .000), [F (3, 487) = 23.296, p = .000, R2=.13]. As a conclusion, the results of this research indicate that there is a significant correlation between the coach-athlete relationship and athletes’ motivation and that some aspects of the quality of coach-athlete relationship could contribute to athletes’ motivation.
Özet
Bu araştırmanın amacı antrenör sporcu ilişkisi ile sporcuların güdülenmeleri arasındaki ilişkiyi belirlemektir. Bu amaçla takım sporları ve bireysel sporlardan, 312 (%63.5) erkek- 179 (%36.5) kadın sporcu olmak üzere toplam 491 sporcu gönüllü olarak araştırmaya katılmıştır. Sporcuların yaşları 19.11±2.70 olarak belirlenmiştir. Araştırmada, Antrenör-Sporcu İlişkisi Envanteri ve Sporda Güdülenme Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen veriler SPSS 17 paket programı ile tanımlayıcı istatistikler, Pearson korelasyon analizi ve çoklu regresyon analizi ile analiz edilmiştir. Bulgulara göre, içsel güdülenme ile yakınlık (r = .235), bağlılık (r = .240) ve tamamlayıcılık (r = .153) arasında anlamlı bir ilişki belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca, dışsal güdülenme ile yakınlık (r = .346), bağlılık (r = .307) ve tamamlayıcılık (r = .270) arasında da anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmuştur. Regresyon analizi sonuçlarına göre yakınlık (β = .197, p = .009) ve bağlılık (β = .197, p = .006) puanlarının içsel güdülenmeyi anlamlı olarak açıkladığı belirlenmiştir [F (3, 487) = 12.539, p = .000, R2=.07]. Ayrıca, dışsal güdülenme ise yakınlık (β = .283, p = .000) puanı tarafından anlamlı olarak açıklanmıştır [F (3, 487) = 23.296, p = .000, R2=.13]. Sonuç olarak, antrenör sporcu ilişkisi ile sporcuların güdülenmesi arasındaki ilişkinin pozitif yönde olduğu ve antrenör sporcu ilişkisinin kalitesi arttıkça sporcuların güdülenmelerinin olumlu yönde değişeceği belirtilebilir.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Adie JW, Jowett S (2010): Meta-perceptions of the coach-athlete relationship, achievement goals, and intrinsic motivation among sport participants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 2750-2773.
Altıntaş A, Çetinkalp ZK, Aşçı FH, (2012): Evaluating the Coach-Athlete Relationship: Validity and Reliability Study. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 23(3), 119-128.
Amorose, A. J., Anderson-Butcher, D., Newman, T. J., Fraina, M., & Iachini, A. (2016). High school athletes’ self-determined motivation: The independent and interactive effects of coach, father, and mother autonomy support. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 26, 1-8.
Banack, H. R., Sabiston, C. M., & Bloom, G. A. (2011). Coach autonomy support, basic need satisfaction, and intrinsic motivation of paralympic athletes.Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 82(4), 722-730.
Fenton, S. A., Duda, J. L., & Barrett, T. (2016). Optimising physical activity engagement during youth sport: a self-determination theory approach. Journal of sports sciences, 1-11.
Hein, V., & Jõesaar, H. (2015). How perceived autonomy support from adults and peer motivational climate are related with self-determined motivation among young athletes. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,13(3), 193-204.
Isoard-Gautheur, S., Trouilloud, D., Gustafsson, H., & Guillet-Descas, E. (2016). Associations between the perceived quality of the coach–athlete relationship and athlete burnout: An examination of the mediating role of achievement goals. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 22, 210-217.
Jõesaar, H., Hein, V., & Hagger, M. S. (2012). Youth athletes’ perception of autonomy support from the coach, peer motivational climate and intrinsic motivation in sport setting: One-year effects. Psychology of Sport and Exercise,13(3), 257-262.
Jowett S Ntoumanis N (2004): The Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (CART – Q): Development and initial validation. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 14, 245–257.
Jowett S, Meek GA (2000): The coach-athlete relationship in married couples: an exploratory content analysis. Sport Psychologist, 14, 157.
Jowett, S., & Nezlek, J. (2011). Relationship interdependence and satisfaction with important outcomes in coach–athlete dyads. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 0265407511420980.
Kazak Z. (2004). A study on reliability and validity of “The sport motivation scale –SMS-” for Turkish athletes. Hacettepe Journal of Sport Sciences, 15(4): 191-206.
Mageau, G. A., & Vallerand, R. J. (2003). The coach–athlete relationship: A motivational model. Journal of sports science, 21(11), 883-904.
Pallant J (2007): SPSS survival manual: A step-by-step guide to data analysis using SPSS version 15. Nova Iorque: McGraw Hill.
Parry, D. (2015). To explore coaches’ perceptions of the impact of closeness on the coach-athlete relationship in a team sport (Doctoral dissertation, Cardiff Metropolitan University).
Pelletier, L. G., Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., Tuson, K. M., Briere, N. M., & Blais, M. R. (1995). Toward a new measure of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation in sports: The Sport Motivation Scale (SMS).Journal of sport and Exercise Psychology, 17, 35-35.
Riley, A., & Smith, A. L. (2011). Perceived coach-athlete and peer relationships of young athletes and self-determined motivation for sport. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 42(1), 115.
Rottensteiner, C., Konttinen, N., & Laakso, L. (2015). Sustained Participation in Youth Sports Related to Coach-Athlete Relationship and Coach-Created Motivational Climate
Standage, M., Duda, J. L., & Ntoumanis, N. (2005). A test of self‐determination theory in school physical education. British Journal of Educational Psychology,75(3), 411-433.
Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (1996): Using Multiple Statistics. Harper Collins Publishers, New York, NY.
Vallerand, R. J., & Rousseau, F. L. (2001). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport and exercise: A review using the hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Handbook of sport psychology, 2, 389-416.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors can retain copyright, while granting the journal right of first publication. Alternatively, authors can transfer copyright to the journal, which then permits authors non-commercial use of the work, including the right to place it in an open access archive. In addition, Creative Commons can be consulted for flexible copyright licenses.
©1999 Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
