ELT teachers working in underprivileged districts of Turkey and their perspective of continuous professional development opportunities
Keywords:
Professional Development, Underprivileged Districts, Teachers’ PerspectiveAbstract
The purpose of this research is to enquire the ELT teachers’ perspective of continuous professional development under restricted conditions they are obliged to teach English. Therefore, 20 EFL teachers who have been working at different state schools in the remote villages of southeast region of Turkey were selected as the participants of the inquiry. The data were collected in two different processes. First, all the teachers in the study were interviewed to answer the questions in the first part of the survey individually. Then, randomly selected 12 teachers were separated into two groups for online focus-group discussions, which were held in a semi-structured context by leading questions adapted from Brown (2013). Data collection processes were audio-recorded, and the qualitative data obtained from interviews and focus group discussions were coded and clustered to form specific themes. The results of the research revealed that teachers working in underprivileged districts of Turkey: (a) believe the crucial contribution of professional development activities for teacher quality and/or student achievement (b) have very limited opportunities and options for sustained professional development, and (c) think that the times allocated for professional development activities should be increased. Moreover, teachers these teachers (d) hope to take place in the planning phase of professional development activities, and (e) are dissatisfied with unfair financial situation. Upon the analysis of these items stated in the results, male teachers were found to focus on more general ideas compared to female teachers (item a and item b). On the other hand, the results indicated that female teachers focused on specific ideas statistically more often compared to male teachers (item c and item d). The teachers did not show statistical gender difference in terms of financial limitations (item e). The results of the research might be generalized to the similar contexts in other underprivileged districts, and similar researches might be conducted with teachers of other fields in order to reach results that are more generalizable.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Arikan, A. (2011). Prospective English language teachers' perceptions of the target language and culture in relation to their socioeconomic status. Canadian Center of Science and Education, 4(3), 232-242.
Atay, D. (2006). Teachers’ professional development: Partnerships in research. Tesl-Ej, 10(2), 1-14.
Bey, T. M., & Holmes, C. T. (1990). Mentoring. Developing Successful New Teachers. Association of Teacher Educators, Reston, VA. Retrieved on 08.07.2017 from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED322118
Birman, B. F., Desimone, L., Porter, A. C., & Garet, M. S. (2000). Designing professional development that works. Educational leadership, 57(8), 28-33.
Brown, J. M. (2013). Professional Development: The Teacher's Perspective. Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville.
Büyükyavuz, O., & İnal, S. (2008). A descriptive study on Turkish teachers of English regarding their professional needs, efforts for development and available resources. The Asian EFL Journal, 10(3), 215-233.
Cornelius-White, J. (2007). Learner-centered teacher-student relationships are effective: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 113-143.
Desimone, L. M. (2009, April). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 181-199.
Fletcher, M. A., & Zuber-Skerritt, O. (2008). Professional development through action research: Case examples in South African higher education. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 21(1), 73-96.
Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945.
Griffin, G. A. (1983). Introduction: the work of staff development, in: G. A. Griffin (Ed.) Staff Development, Eighty-Second Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 48-55. University of Chicago Press.
Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8 (3), 381-391.
Guskey, T. R., & Sparks, D. (2002, April). Linking professional development to improvement in student learning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Guskey, T. R. (2003, April). The characteristics of effective Professional development: A synthesis of lists. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago, IL.
Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (Eds.). (1992). Understanding teacher development. London and New York: Teachers College Press.
Huba, M. E., & Freed, J. E. (2000). Learner centered assessment on college campuses: Shifting the focus from teaching to learning. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 24(9), 759-766.
Huberman, M. (1995). Professional careers and professional development: some intersections, in: T. R. Guskey& M. Huberman, Professional Development in Education: new paradigms and practices, 193± 224. New York, Teachers College Press.
Işık, A. (2008). Yabancı dil eğitimimizdeki yanlışlar nereden kaynaklanıyor?. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 4(2), pp-15.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. H. (2014). An Introduction to Second Language Acquisition Research. New York, Routledge.
Li, Y. (2015). Is Teacher Professional Development an Effective Way to Mitigate Teachers’ Gender Differences in Technology? Result from a Statewide Teacher Professional Development Program. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(2), 21-26.
Little, C. A., & Paul, K. A. (2009, December). Weighing the workshop assess the merits with six key criteria for planning and evaluating. JSD, 30(5), 26-30.
Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Yamaguchi, R., & Gallagher, L. P. (2007, December). What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44 (4), 921-958.
Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning?. Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15.
Richards, J. C., & Farrell T.S.C. (2005). Professional Development for Language Teachers: Strategies for Teacher Learning. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Robbins, P. (1995) Peer Coaching: Quality through collaborative work, in J. Block, S. F. Everson & T. R. Guskey (Eds) School Improvement Programs: a handbook for educational leaders. New York: Scholastic.
Sari, M. (2012). Exploring gender roles’ effects of Turkish women teachers on their teaching practices. International journal of educational development, 32(6), 814-825.
Serin, G. (2015). The effect of gender and professional development in information and communication technology (ICT) on science teachers’ use of classroom practices. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 5(1), 20-37.
Singh, K., & Shifflette, L. M. (1996). Teachers' perspectives on professional development. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 10(2), 145-160.
Suri, H. (2011). Purposeful sampling in qualitative research synthesis. Qualitative Research Journal, 11(2), 63-75.
Timperley, H. (2008). Teacher professional learning and development. International Bureau of Education. Brussels. (p. 15). Retrieved on 07.07.2017 from: http://www.ibe.unesco.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Publications/Educational_Practices/EdPractices_18.pdf
Uysal, H. H. (2012). Evaluation of an in-service training program for primary-school language teachers in Turkey. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(7), n7.
Weimer, M. (2002). Learner-centered Teaching: Five Key Changes to Practice. John Wiley & Sons. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, A Wiley Imprint.
Yurtsever, G. (2013). English language instructors’ beliefs on professional development models and preferences to improve their teaching skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 666-674.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors can retain copyright, while granting the journal right of first publication. Alternatively, authors can transfer copyright to the journal, which then permits authors non-commercial use of the work, including the right to place it in an open access archive. In addition, Creative Commons can be consulted for flexible copyright licenses.
©1999 Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
