Law and literature: A relation reargued<p>Hukuk ve edebiyat: Tekrar tartışılmakta olan bir ilişki
Keywords:
Law and literature, judicial opinion, legal parlance, Hukuk ve edebiyat, içtihat, hukuk diliAbstract
Çevirenin notu:
Edebî çalışmalar, akademik hukukçuların çekici bulduğu beşerî ilimlerden birisidir. Bu makale niçin akademik hukukçuların edebiyatla ilgilendiklerini ve "hukuk ve edebiyat" alanının hangi sahasının hukuk veya edebiyat anlayışına katkı sağlamasının beklenebileceğini ele almaktadır. Edebiyat araştırmalarının yazılı kanunların ve anayasaların yorumlanmasına çok az bir katkısı olabilir ancak içtihadın iyileştirilmesine ve içtihat anlayışına çok büyük bir katkı sağlayabilecek unsurlar içerir. Makale üç konuyla sınırlıdır: Edebiyatta yasal konuların sunumu; yasal metinlerin edebî eleştiri yöntemleriyle yorumlanması ve içtihatların iyileştirilmesi için edebiyatın kullanılması.
Çevirilen makalenin hukuk ve edebiyat ilişkisine açıklık sağlamada ve boyut kazandırmada bir katkısı olabilir.
Downloads
Metrics
References
A. Bloom, Shakespeare's Politics 17-18 (1964).
Adler, Annals of Law: Two Trials (pts. 1 & 2), The New Yorker, June 16, 1986, at 42, June 23, 1986.
A. Marvell, An Horatian Ode upon Cromwel's Return from Ireland, in Andrew Marvell: Complete Poetry 55-58 (G. Lord ed. 1968).
A. Savile, The Test of Time: An Essay in Philosophical Aesthetics (1982).
Ball, The Play's the Thing: An Unscientific Reflection on Courts Under the Rubric of Theater, 28 Stan. L. Rev. 81 (1975).
B. Cardozo, Law and Literature, in Selected Writings of Benjamin Nathan Cardozo 339 (M. Hall ed. 1947).
Bevington, General Introduction, in The Complete Works of Shakespeare 2, 79 (D. Bevington 3d ed. 1980).
Brest, Interpretation and Interest, 34 Stan. L. Rev. 765 (1982).
Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 532 (1953).
Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200, 207 (1927).
C. Brooks, The Well Wrought Urn: Studies in the Structure of Poetry (1947).
C. Davis, The Law in Shakespeare (1883).
Cf. Abraham, Statutory Interpretation and Literary Theory: Some Common Concerns of an Unlikely Pair, 32 Rutgers L. Rev. 676, 694 (1979).
C. Norris, Deconstruction: Theory and Practice (1982).
Cover, The Supreme Court, 1982 Term-Foreword: Nomos and Narrative, 97 Harv. L. Rev. 4 (1983).
Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln 22-23 (R. Basler ed. 1953).
Currie, The Constitution in the Supreme Court: Full Faith and the Bill of Rights, 1889-1910, 52 U. Chi. L. Rev. 867, 900 (1985)
, The Constitution in the Supreme Court: 1910-1921, 1985 Duke L.J. 1111, 1145-55, 1161.
C. S. Lewis, The Literary Impact of the Authorised Version, in Selected Literary Essays 126 (1969).
D. MacDowell, The Law in Classical Athens (1978).
Doe v. Bolton, 410 U.S. 179, 221 (1973).
Dudziak, Oliver Wendell Holmes as a Eugenic Reformer: Rhetoric in the Writing of Constitutional Law, 71 Iowa L. Rev. 833, 859-67 (1986).
Dworkin, Law as Interpretation, 60 Tex. L. Rev. 527 (1982).
E. Corbett, Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student 35, 73 (2d ed. 1971).
E. Hirsch, The Aims of Interpretation (1976).
, Validity in Interpretation (1967).
E. Levi, An Introduction to Legal Reasoning 30-31 (1949).
E. Tillyard & C.S. Lewis, The Personal Heresy: A Controversy (1939).
E. Wilson, Patriotic Gore: Studies in the Literature of the American Civil War 120- 23 (1962).
F. Kermode, The Classic 77-78 (1975).
F. Lentricchia, After the New Criticism (1980).
Friedman, Private Creation and Enforcement of Law: A Historical Case, 8 J. Legal Stud. 399 (1979).
Frye, Literature and the Law, 4 L. Soc'y Gazette 70, 70-72 (1970).
Frug, Henry James, Lee Marvin and the Law, N.Y. Times, Feb. 16, 1986.
Fuller, The Case of the Speluncean Explorers, 62 Harv. L. Rev. 616 (1949).
George Orwell, Lear, Tolstoy, and the Fool, in 4 Collected Essays, Journalism and Letters of George Orwell, 287, 290, 302 (S. Orwell & I. Angus eds. 1968).
Gibson, Literary Minds and Judicial Style, 36 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 915, 928-30 (1961).
Gordon, Holmes' Common Law as Legal and Social Science, 10 Hofstra L. Rev. 719, 739-40 (1982).
, Wall, Social Darwinism and Constitutional Law, with Special Reference to Lochner v. New York, 33 Annals Sci. 465, 475-76 (1976).
Granucci, "Nor Cruel and Unusual Punishments Inflicted:" The Original Meaning, 57 Calif. L. Rev. 839, 840-42 (1969).
Grey, The Constitution as Scripture, 37 Stan. L. Rev. 1, 2 (1984).
G. White, The Integrity of Holmes' Jurisprudence, 10 Hofstra L. Rev. 633, 650-52, 664, 668-71 (1982).
Hirshleifer, The Expanding Domain of Economics, Am. Econ. Rev., Dec. 1985 (special issue), at 53.
H. Kenner, A Colder Eye: The Modem Irish Writers 25, 103 (1983).
Honigmann, Shakespeare as a Reviser, in Textual Criticism and Literary Interpretation 1 (J. McGann ed. 1985).
Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 U.S. 184, 197 (1964).
J. Culler, On Deconstruction: Theory and Criticism After Structuralism (1982).
J. Ellis, The Theory of Literary Criticism: A Logical Analysis 24-53 (1974).
J. Hendry, The Sacred Threshold: A Life of Rainer Maria Rilke 137 (1983).
Justice Holmes Ex Cathedra (E. Bander ed. 1966).
J. Keats, Ode to a Nightingale, in John Keats and Percy Bysshe Shelley- Complete Poetical Works 183 (Modern Library ed. 1932).
Jackson & Jeffries, Commercial Speech: Economic Due Process and the First Amendment, 65 Va. L. Rev. 1, 30-33 (1979).
Johnson v. United States, 333 U.S. 10 (1948).
J. White, The Legal Imagination: Studies in the Nature of Legal Thoughts and Expression (1973).
, Heracles' Bow: Essays on the Rhetoric and Poetics of the Law (1985)
, When Words Lose Their Meaning: Constitutions and Reconstitutions of Language, Character, and Community (1984).
, When Words Lose Their Meaning, supra note 29, at 247-63 (analyzing McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. (4 Wheat.) 316 (1819).
Landes & Posner, Legal Precedent. A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, 19 J. Law & Econ. 249 (1976).
Levinson, Law as Literature, 60 Tex. L. Rev. 373 (1982).
L. Carroll, Alice's Adventures in Wonderland, in Alice in Wonderland 3, 97-98 (1923).
Lochner, 197 U.S. at 75 (citing Holden v. Hardy, 169 U.S. 366 (1898); Otis v. Parker, 187 U.S. 606 (1903).
Michaels, Against Formalism: The Autonomous Text in Legal and Literary Interpretation, 1 Poetics Today 23, 29-30 (1979).
M. Moorman, William Wordsworth: A Biography, Early Years 1770-1803, at 423-28 (1957).
N. Morris, Madness and the Criminal Law 7-27, 89-126 (1982).
Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928).
O. Phillips, Shakespeare and the Lawyers (1972).
O. W. Holmes, The Use of Law Schools, in Collected Legal Papers 35, 42 (1920).
Paul v. Davis, 424 U.S. 693 (1976).
Papke, Neo-Marxists, Nietzscheans and new Critics: The Voices of the Contemporary Law and Literature Discourse (1985).
Peller, The Metaphysics of American Law, 73 Calif. L. Rev. 1151, 1160 n.6, 1171-74 (1985).
P. Clarkson & C. Warren, The Law of Property in Shakespeare and the Elizabethan Drama (1942).
R. Dworkin, Law's Empire 45-86 (1986).
R. Gray, Franz Kafka 91 (1973).
R. Epstein, Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain 108-09, 128, 280-81 (1985).
Robinson, The Law of the State in Kafka's The Trial, 6 ALSA Forum 127 (1982).
R. Posner, The Economics of Justice (1981).
, The Ethical Significance of Free Choice: A Reply to Professor West, 99 Harv. L. Rev. 1431 (1986).
, The Federal Courts: Crisis and Reform 105-19 (1985).
, Economic Analysis of Law (3d ed. 1986).
, Book Review, 96 Yale L. J. (forthcoming April, 1987)
, Easterbrook, Statutes' Domains, 50 U. Chi. L. Rev. 533, 534 (1983).
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 171 (1973).
R. P. Warren, Pure and Impure Poetry, in Selected Essays 3, 27 (1958).
R. Weisberg, The Failure of the Word: The Protagonist as Lawyer in Modern Fiction (1984).
S. Bedford, The Faces of Justice: A Traveller's Report (1961).
S. Fish, Is There a Text in This Class? (1980).
, Objectivity and Interpretation, 34 Stan. L. Rev. 739 (1982), and vigorously debated in Law and Literature, 60 Tex. L. Rev. 373 (1982) (symposium issue).
S. Johnson, Preface to the Plays of William Shakespeare, in Samuel Johnson: Selected Poetry and Prose 299, 301 (F. Brady & W. Wimsatt eds. 1977).
Stephen, The License of Modern Novelists, 106 Edinburgh Rev. 124, 128 (1857).
T. Eagleton, Literary Theory: An Introduction 46-53 (1983).
T.S. Eliot, The Waste Land 1 (V. Eliot ed. 1971).
, Shakespeare and the Stoicism of Seneca, in Selected Essays 107, 115-18 (new ed. 1960).
W. B. Yeats, Easter 1916, in The Collected Poems of W.B. Yeats 177 (def. ed. 1956).
, The Second Coming, in The Collected Poems of W.B. Yeats, supra note 48, at 185.
Weisberg & Barricelli, Literature and Law, in Interrelations of Literature 150 (J. Barricelli & J. Gibaldi eds. 1982).
Weisberg, Law, Literature and Cardozo's Judicial Poetics, 1 Cardozo L. Rev. 283, 320-41 (1979).
, How Judges Speak: Some Lessons on Adjudication in Billy Budd, Sailor* with an Application to Justice Rehnquist, 57 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1, 42-58 (1982).
West, Authority, Autonony, and Choice: The Role of Consent in the Moral and Political Visions of Franz Kafka and Richard Posner, 99 Harv. L. Rev. 384 (1985).
White, Law as Language: Reading Law and Reading Literature, 60 Tex. L. Rev. 415 (1982).
, Judicial Criticism, 20 Ga. L. Rev. (forthcoming Fall, 1986).
, Law as Rhetoric, Rhetoric as Law: The Arts of Cultural and Communal Life, 52 U. Chi. L. Rev. 684 (1985)
, White offers literary analyses of Justice Frankfurter's opinion in Rochin v. California, 342 U.S. 165 (1952).
W. Holdsworth, Charles Dickens as a Legal Historian (1929).
Wigmore, Introduction, in J. Gest, The Lawyer in Literature IX-XII (1913).
W. Mitchell ed., The Politics of Interpretation 249-320 (1983).
W. Wimsatt, The Verbal Icon: Studies in the Meaning of Poetry (1954).
W. Wordsworth, Untitled Poem, in 2 The Poetical Works of William Wordsworth 216 (E. de Selincourt 2d ed. 1967).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors can retain copyright, while granting the journal right of first publication. Alternatively, authors can transfer copyright to the journal, which then permits authors non-commercial use of the work, including the right to place it in an open access archive. In addition, Creative Commons can be consulted for flexible copyright licenses.
©1999 Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
