Applicability of resource theory on leisure sport events: Validity and reliability study<p>Kaynak kuramının boş zaman spor etkinliklerinde uygulanabilirliği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması
Keywords:
Leisure, sport, event, research theory, validity, reliability, Boş zaman, spor, etkinlik, kaynak kuramı, geçerlik, güvenirlikAbstract
Resource theory assesses the features of resources changed between individuals, change patterns and change rules. In this resource, it was aimed to adapt Organizers’ Perceived Resource Investments (OPRI) and Participants’ Reported Resource Investments (PRRI) developed based on resource theory and evaluating resource investment of activity organizer and participant in terms of the point of view of the participant into Turkish language and culture.
303 people selected with convenience sampling method participating into 5 th Eskişehir Dance Festival participated into the resource. Data was collected by means of questionnaire using face-to-face interviewing technique. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmative Factor Analysis (CFA) were used for structural validity of the scales. Internal consistency, test - retest and total item correlation analyses were utilized for reliability.
AFA and DFA results support OPRI structure of 6 factors and 18 items and PRRI structure of 5 factors and 15 items. It was detected that reliability in all items and dimensions were within the acceptance level. The resource conclusion has revealed that OPRI and PRRI have structural features that can be used for the assessment of resource investments of participants of leisure time sport activities. Moreover, it was concluded that the participants of leisure time sport activities in Turkey evaluates resource investment with different dimensions compared to other cultures.
Extended English summary is in the end of Full Text PDF (TURKISH) file.Özet
Kaynak teorisi bireyler arasında değiştirilen kaynakların özelliklerini, değişim kalıplarını ve değişim kurallarını değerlendirmektedir. Bu araştırmada kaynak teorisi temel alınarak geliştirilen, katılımcının bakış açısına göre etkinlik organizatörünün ve katılımcının kaynak yatırımını değerlendiren Organizatörün Algılanan Kaynak Yatırım Ölçeği (OAKYÖ) ve Katılımcı Kaynak Yatırımı Ölçeğin (KKYÖ)’nin Türk dil ve kültürüne uyarlanması amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmaya 5. Eskişehir Dans Festivaline katılan kolayda örnekleme yöntemi ile seçilen 303 kişi katılmıştır. Veriler yüz yüze görüşme tekniği kullanılarak anket aracılığı ile toplanmıştır. Ölçeklerin yapı geçerliliği için Açımlayıcı Faktör Analizi (AFA) ve Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi (DFA) kullanılmıştır. Güvenirlik için ise iç tutarlılık, madde toplam korelasyonu ve test tekrar test analizlerinden yararlanılmıştır. AFA ve DFA sonuçları OAKYÖ’nün 6 faktörlü 18 madde, KKYÖ’nün ise 5 faktörlü 15 maddeden oluşan yapısını desteklemektedir. Ölçeklerdeki tüm maddelerin ve boyutların güvenirliliğinin kabul düzeyinde olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Araştırma sonucu OAKYÖ ve KKYÖ’nün boş zaman spor etkinlik katılımcılarının kaynak yatırımlarının değerlendirilmesinde kullanılabilecek yapısal özelliklere sahip olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Ayrıca Türkiye’de boş zaman spor etkinlik katılımcılarının kaynak yatırımını diğer kültürlere göre farklı boyutlar ile değerlendirdiği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Baumgartner, H., & Homburg, C. (1996). Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(2), 139-161.
Bek N, Şimşek E, Erel S, Yakut Y, Uygur F, (2009), “Turkish version of ımpact on family scale: a study of reliability and validity”, Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2(4), 1-7.
Brinberg, D., & Wood, R. (1983). A resource exchange theory analysis of consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(3), 330-338.
Büyüköztürk Ş. (2014). Sosyal bilimlerde veri analizi el kitabı (19. Baskı). Pegem Akademi: Ankara.
Byrne, B.M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: Comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument. International Journal of Testing, 1(1), 55-86.
Choo H. & Petrick J. F. (2013). Resource exchanges for agritourism service encounters. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 22:770–780.
Comrey, A. L. (1988). Factor-analytic methods of scale development in personality and clinical psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 754-761.
DAĞ, İhsan, (2002). Kontrol odağı ölçeği: ölçek geliştirme, güvenirlik ve geçerlik çalışması. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 17 (49), s. 77-90.
Donncnwonh. Gregory V. & Uriel G. Foa (1974). Effects of resource class on retaliation to ınjustice in ınterpersonal exchan EC. Journal of Personality and Sociail Pschology, 29(6). 785-793.
Dorsch, M. J., & L. Carlson (1996). A Transaction approach to understanding and managing customer equity. Journal of Business Research, 35 (3): 253-64.
Foa, U. G., & Foa, E. B. (1974). Societal structures of the mind. Springfi eld, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Foa, U. G. (1976). Resource theory of social exchanges. In contemporary topics in social psychology, edited by J. S. Thiabut and R. Carson. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press, pp. 99-131.
Foa, E. B., & Foa, U. G. (1976). Resource theory of social exchange. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
Foa, E. B., & Foa, U. G. (1980). Resource theory: Interpersonal behavior as exchange. In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds,), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research. New York: Plenum Press.
Fornell, C., Larcker, D. F. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variablesand measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Frohlich, M. T., & Westbrook, R. (2001). Arcs of integration: an international study of supply chain strategies. Journal of Operations Management, 19(2), 185-200.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Hambleton, R.K. & Patsula, L. (1999). Increasing the validity of adapted tests: Myths to be avoided and guidelines for improving test adaptation practices. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 1(1), 1-30.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
Jöreskog, K.G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: User’s guide. Chicago: Scientific Software.
Kline, R.B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.
Loyd, S., R. Cate, and J. Henton (1982). Brand loyalty vs repeat purchasing behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 10 (1): 1-9.
Marsh, H.W., Hau, K.T., Artelt, C., Baumert, J., & Peschar, J.L. (2006).
OECD’s brief self-report measure of educational psychology’s most useful affective constructs: Cross-cultural, psychometric comparisons across 25 countries. International Journal of Testing, 6(4), 311-360.
Morais, D. B. (2000). Reconceptualization of loyalty under a resource investment perspective: a study of group leaders in the leisure service industry. Ph.D. diss., Clemson University, Clemson, SC.
Morais, D. B., Backman, S. J., & Dorsch, M. J. (2003). Toward the operationalization of resource investments made between customers and providers of a tourism service. Journal of Travel Research, 41(4), 362-374.
Nunnally J, Bernstein I, (1994). Psycometric theory. pp..33-34, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Okayasu, I., Nogawa, H., Casper, J. M., & Morais, D. B. (2016). Recreational sports event participants’ attitudes and satisfaction: cross-cultural comparisons between runners in Japan and the USA. Managing Sport and Leisure, 21(3), 164-180.
Okayasu, I., Nogawa, H. & Morais, D. B. (2009). Operationalization of the resource investments construct of recreational sport event. Event Management. 12 (3-4), 209-223.
Okayasu, I., Nogawa, H., & Morais, D. B. (2010). Resource investments and loyalty to recreational sport tourism event. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 27(6), 565-578.
Polit DF, Beck CT, (2006). The content validity index: are you sure, you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489-497.
Robinson J. P., Shaver P.R. & Wrightman L. S. (1991). Criteria for Scale Selection and Evaluation in Measure of Personality and Psychological Attitudes. San Diego: California Academic Press.
Schermelleh-Engel, K., & Moosbrugger, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74.
Seçer İ. (2015). Psikolojik test geliştirme ve uyarlama süreci. SPSS ve Lisrel uygulamaları. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
Sriram, V., and V. Mummalaneni (1990). Determinants of source loyalty in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 26 (4): 21-26.
Tavşancıl E, (2002). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara, 48-55, 2002.
Teichman, M., & Foa, U. G. (1975). Effect of resources similarity of satisfaction with exchange. Social Behavior and Personality, 3(2), 213–224.
Waltz CF, Strickland OL, Lenz ER, (2005). Measurement innursing and health research(3rded.) New York: Springer Publishing Co.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors can retain copyright, while granting the journal right of first publication. Alternatively, authors can transfer copyright to the journal, which then permits authors non-commercial use of the work, including the right to place it in an open access archive. In addition, Creative Commons can be consulted for flexible copyright licenses.
©1999 Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
