The validity and reliability study on Turkish version of the Questionnaire of Changes in Experiencing and Behavior<p>Yaşantı ve Davranışlarda Değişim Ölçeği Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması
Keywords:
Changes Measurement, Outcome Studies, Therapeutic Success, Evaluation, Validity, Reliability, Değişim Ölçümü, Sonuç Araştırması, Terapötik Başarı, Değerlendirme, Geçerlik, GüvenirlikAbstract
The aim of this study is to adapt Questionnaire of Changes in Experiencing and Behavior (QCEB) developed by Zielke and Kopf-Mehnert (1978, 2001) to Turkish. The scale provides information about change, direction and strength after counseling. The original version of the questionnaire is in German; the scale is one factor and consists of 42 items. For the adaptation study, the original scale was firstly translated into Turkish. After linguistic equivalence study, item analysis, validity and reliability studies were carried out. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to test the validity of the structure and it was found that the compliance indices were acceptable (?²=2113;/sd=818; ?²/sd=2.5; CFI=.95; TLI=.94; RMSEA=0.08; SRMR=0.06). The results of this analysis show that the original factor structure of QCEB has been replicated and adequately validated in the sample of Turkish clients. In addition, the analysis of the items revealed that total correlations of the items were significant. In the context of reliability studies of the scale, Cronbach ? and test-retest values were calculated. Based on this, the scale had Cronbach ? value of .96 and a test-retest value of .72. As a result, Questionnaire of Changes in Experiencing and Behavior shows that there is a valid and reliable scale that can be used to measure the change after counseling or psychotherapy in Turkey.
Extended English summary is in the end of Full Text PDF (TURKISH) file.Özet
Bu çalışmanın amacı, Zielke ve Kopf-Mehnert (1978, 2001) tarafından geliştirilen Yaşantı ve Davranışlarda Değişim Ölçeğini (YADA) Türkçeye uyarlamaktır. Ölçek psikolojik danışma sonrasındaki değişimin, yönü ve gücü hakkında bilgi sunmaktadır. Özgün formu Almanca olan ölçek, tek faktörlü ve 42 maddeden oluşmaktadır. Uyarlama çalışması için öncelikle özgün ölçeğin Türkçeye çevirisi yapılmıştır. Dilsel eşdeğerlilik çalışmasının ardından madde analizi, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmaları gerçekleştirilmiştir. Yapı geçerliğini test etmek için doğrulayıcı faktör analizi yapılmış ve uyum indekslerinin kabul edilebilir düzeyde olduğu bulunmuştur (χ²=2113;/sd=818; χ²/sd=2.5; CFI=.95; TLI=.94; RMSEA=0.08; SRMR=0.06). Bu analiz sonuçları YADA'nın orijinal faktör yapısının Türk danışanlardan oluşan örneklemde yinelendiğini ve yeterli düzeyde geçerliliğinin olduğunu göstermektedir. Ayrıca yapılan madde analizi ölçekteki maddelerin, madde toplam korelasyonlarının anlamlı olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Ölçeğin güvenirlik çalışmaları bağlamında Cronbach α ve test-tekrar test değerleri hesaplanmıştır. Buna göre ölçeğin Cronbach α değeri .96 ve test-tekrar test değeri .72 olarak tespit edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak Yaşantı ve Davranışlarda Değişim Ölçeği'nin Türkiye'de psikolojik danışma veya psikoterapi sonrasında danışanlardaki değişimin ölçülmesinde kullanılabilecek geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçek olduğunu göstermektedir.
The aim of this study is to adapt Questionnaire of Changes in Experiencing and Behavior (QCEB) developed by Zielke and Kopf-Mehnert (1978, 2001) to Turkish. The scale provides information about change, direction and strength after counseling. The original version of the questionnaire is in German; the scale is one factor and consists of 42 items. For the adaptation study, the original scale was firstly translated into Turkish. After linguistic equivalence study, item analysis, validity and reliability studies were carried out. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to test the validity of the structure and it was found that the compliance indices were acceptable (χ²=2113;/sd=818; χ²/sd=2.5; CFI=.95; TLI=.94; RMSEA=0.08; SRMR=0.06). The results of this analysis show that the original factor structure of QCEBhas been replicated and adequately validated in the sample of Turkish clients. In addition, the analysis of the items revealed that total correlations of the items were significant. In the context of reliability studies of the scale, Cronbach α and test-retest values were calculated. Based on this, the scale had Cronbach α value of .96 and a test-retest value of .72. As a result, Questionnaire of Changes in Experiencing and Behavior shows that there is a valid and reliable scale that can be used to measure the change after counseling or psychotherapy in Turkey.Downloads
Metrics
References
Akın, A. (2008). Psikolojik iyi olma ölçekleri: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 8(3), 721-750.
Beck, T., Riedl, D., Schöckel, A., Reddemann, L., Exenberger, S., & Lampe, A. (2017). Measuring Self-Soothing Ability in Patients with Childhood Trauma–Psychometric Evaluation of the Self-Soothing Scale in a Clinical Sample. Zeitschrift für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, 63(4), 405-416. https://doi.org/10.13109/zptm.2017.63.4.405
Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: The Guilford Press.
Cenkseven, F. (2004). Üniversite öğrencilerinde öznel ve psikolojik iyi olmanın yordayıcılarının incelenmesi (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Çukurova Üniversitesi, Adana.
Derogatis, L. R. (1983). SCL-90-R: Administration, scoring & procedures manual-II for the R (evised) version and other instruments of the psychopathology rating scale series. Towson, MD: Clinic Psychometric Research.
Derogatis, L. R. (1992). SCL-90-R: Administration, scoring of procedures manual-II for the R(evised) version and other instruments of the psychopathology rating scale series. Towson, Md: Clinical Psychometric Research Inc.
Hill, C. E. & Lambert, M. J. (2004). Methodological Issues in Studying Psychotherapy Processes and Outcomes. In M. J. Lambert (Hrsg.), Bergin and Garfield’s Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change (S. 84–136). New York: Wiley.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
Howard, K. I., Lueger, R. J. & Kolden, G. G. (1997). Measuring progress and outcome in the treatment of affective disorders. In H. H. Strupp, L. M. Horowitz & M. J. Lambert (Hrsg.), Measuring patient changes in mood, anxiety, and personality disorders: Toward a core battery (S. 191-245). Washington: American Psychological Association.
Flückiger, C., Regli, D., Grawe, K. & Lutz, W. (2007). Differences and similarities between pre-post and retrospective measurings. Psychotherapy Research, 17, 359-364.
Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural Equation modeling with SIMPLIS Command Language. Lincolnwood: Scientific Software International Inc.
Kiresuk, T. I. & Sherman, R. E. (1968). Goal Attainment Scaling: A general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs. Community Mental Health Journal, 4, 443-453.
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2. Bs.). New York: Guilford Press.
Krampen, G. & Hank, P. (2008). Prozessdiagnostik und kontrollierte Praxis. In B. Röhrle, F. Caspar & P. Schlottke (Hrsg.), Lehrbuch der klinisch-psychologischen Diagnostik. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
Krampen, G. (2010). Direkte Veränderungsmessung der Effekte von Entspannungstherapie/-training und Psychotherapie: Ihre Vor- und Nachteile sowie psychometrische Hilfsmittel. Entspannungsverfahren, 27, 48-64.
Lutz, W., & Böhnke, J. R. (2010). Psychotherapieforschung: Verläufe, Prozesse, Ergebnisse und Qualitätssicherung. In W. Lutz (Ed.), Lehrbuch Psychotherapie (pp. 49–69). Bern: Huber.
Ogles, B. M. (2013). Measuring Change in Psychotherapy Research. In M. J. Lambert (Hrsg.), Bergin and Garfield’s Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change. 6th Edition (S. 134-166). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Ramseyer, F., & Tschacher, W. (2014). Nonverbal synchrony of head-and body-movement in psychotherapy: different signals have different associations with outcome. Frontiers in psychology, 5.
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everyting, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069-1081.
Sanberk, I. (2010). Psikolojik danışman-danışan ilişkisinin çözümlenmesi ve bazı süreç, sonuç değişkenleri açısından incelenmesi (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Çukurova Üniversitesi, Adana.
Sanberk, I. (2014). Psikolojik danışma sürecinin gözleminde yöntemsel farklılıklar. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 23(2), 253–268.
Sanberk, I., & Akbas, T. (2015). Psychological Counseling Processes of Prospective Psychological Counsellors: An Investigation of Client-Counsellor Interactions. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 15(4), 859-878. DOI 10.12738/estp.2015.4.2482
Schindler, L., Hohenberger-Sieberer, E., & Hahlweg, K. (1989). Observing client-therapist interaction in behaviour therapy: Development and first application of an observational system. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 213–226.
Sümer, N. (2000). Yapısal Eşitlik Modelleri: Temel Kavramlar ve Örnek Uygulamalar. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 3(6), 49-74.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). New York: Harper Collins
Zielke, M. & Kopf-Mehnert, C. (1978). Der Veränderungsfragebogen des Erlebens und Verhaltens VEV. Weinheim: Beltz.
Zielke, M. (1999). Direkte und indirekte Veränderungsmessung bei Interventionsansätzen Methoden und Ergebnisse. Praxis klinische Verhaltensmedizin und Rehabilitation, 45, 3-13.
Zielke, M. & Kopf-Mehnert, C. (2001). Der VEV-R-2001: Entwicklung und testtheoretische Reanalyse der revidierten Form des Veränderungsfragebogens des Erlebens und Verhaltens (VEV). Praxis klinische Verhaltensmedizin und Rehabilitation, 53, 7-19.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors can retain copyright, while granting the journal right of first publication. Alternatively, authors can transfer copyright to the journal, which then permits authors non-commercial use of the work, including the right to place it in an open access archive. In addition, Creative Commons can be consulted for flexible copyright licenses.
©1999 Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
