An evaluation of urban open spaces in Historical City Center of Konya in the context of pedestrian mobility
Keywords:
Urban open space, space syntax, pedestrian mobility, continuity, squares, KonyaAbstract
Cities are organisms that live in a balance of continuity with the structures they possess and the urban open spaces that connect them. For this organism, staying alive and healthy is possible if urban dwellers, who are the users, utilize the spaces in a manner that preserves their integrity and locate each space in mental perception. Research problem/aim; Squares, which are one of the urban open spaces, are the breathing centers of the city that play important roles in maintaining this integrity. This study aims to test the relation of squares and pedestrian movement for each square and for the whole historical city. Method; In the present study examining the squares and their relationships in the historical city center of Konya province, 7 squares that have a semantic relationship resulting from being located on a specific axis with one another were analyzed with respect to pedestrian use and the respective physical characteristics of the squares. The main criteria defined in the study constitute the 3 steps of the method. These were identified as function-diversity, accessibility-form and livability–identity. Analyses were conducted based on the 3 established criteria and the 7 sub-criteria that measure the relationships among these at certain levels. Each analysis constitutes a step of the method and enables to achieve a result by using different measurement techniques. In the context of the analyses and findings, qualitative and quantitative studies such as a questionnaire study, land use, dominant land use, function diversity, global and local accessibility, form and geometry, urban open space and symbolic elements analyses were conducted for each square. Findings, Conclusions; As a result of this study carried out with the aim of reinforcing urban continuity and enhancing the relationship among squares, the primary data for each square were obtained and suggestions were presented for eliminating the deficiencies. With the implementation of these suggestions, the holistic perception of the squares, which are focal points located within the historical city center, will be stronger and these squares will have more enhanced functional and semantic connections with one another. In this way, significant contributions will be made regarding the users’ getting to know the city center, the use of squares for different needs and the protection of the integrity of the historical city center with regard to cultural identity.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Akkar Ercen, M., & Belge, Z. S. (2017). Daha Yaşanabilir Kentler İçin Mikro Ölçek Bir Yürünebilirlik Modeli. METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 34(1).
Ching, F. D. (2014). Architecture: Form, space, and order: John Wiley & Sons.
Cohen, N. (1999). Urban conservation: The MIT Press.
Cullen, G. (1961). The concise townscape: London: Architectural Press.
Çubuk, M. (1991). Kamu Mekanları ve Kentsel Tasarım. Kamu Mekanları Tasarımı ve Kent Mobilyaları Sempozyumu, 15-16.
Erdönmez, M. E., & Apak, H. (2015). Kentsel Bellekte Meydan San Marco Meydanı. Kent Akademisi, 8(3), 73-96.
Eren, İ. Ö. (2006). Kentsel Sürdürülebilirlik Bağlamında Bir İrdeleme: Üsküdar Meydanı. tasarım+ kuram dergisi, 10(18).
Francis, M. (1987). Urban Open Spaces, Advances in Environment, Behavior, and Design: New York, Plenum Press.
Giritlioglu, C. (1991). Sehirsel Mekan Ögeleri ve Tasarimi. ITÜ Mimarlik Fakültesi Yayini, Istanbul.
Hillier, B. (2007). Space is the machine: a configurational theory of architecture: Space Syntax.
Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984). The social logic of space, 1984. Cambridge: Press syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
Kılıç, A. (2001). Kentsel Açık Alanların Kullanıcılar Tarafından Değerlendirilmesi: Kadıköy İskele Meydanı Ve Yakın Çevresi. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
Korkmaz, E. (2001). Kentsel Açık Alanların Kullanıcılar Tarafından Değerlendirilmesi: Beşiktaş Örneği. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
Krier, R., & Rowe, C. (1979). Urban space: Academy editions London.
Kürkçüoğlu, E. (2015). Kentsel Dokuda Yaya Hareketlerinin Mekânsal ve Psikolojik Etki Değerlendirmesi, Doktora Tezi, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü
Kürkçüoğlu, E. & Ocakçı, M. (2015). Kentsel Dokuda Mekânsal Yönelme Üzerine Bir Algı-Davranış Çalışması: Kadıköy Çarşı Bölgesi, Megaron, 10(3), 365-388.
Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city (Vol. 11): MIT press.
Norberg-Schulz, C. (1971). Existence, space & architecture: New York: Praeger.
Oliveira, V. (2013). Morpho: a methodology for assessing urban form. Urban Morphology, 17(1), 21-33.
Özer, M. N., & Ayten, M. A. (2005). Kamusal odak olarak kent meydanları. Şehir Plancıları Odası Planlama Dergisi, 3, 96-103.
Southworth, M. (1989). Theory and practice of contemporary urban design: a review of urban design plans in the United States. Town Planning Review, 60(4), 369.
Zorlu, F. (2008). Kentsel Doku-Ulaşım Sistemi İlişkileri. METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 25(1).
URL 1: (http://www.superaktif.net/gezi/konya-alaaddin-tepesi) access date: 17.06.2018
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors can retain copyright, while granting the journal right of first publication. Alternatively, authors can transfer copyright to the journal, which then permits authors non-commercial use of the work, including the right to place it in an open access archive. In addition, Creative Commons can be consulted for flexible copyright licenses.
©1999 Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.