Evaluate the existing political oversight role of Turkish parliament over the public finance and in this context analyzed the new Turkish Presidential Government System

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14687/jhs.v16i3.5666

Keywords:

Turkish presidential government system, political representation, political accountability, governmental systems, 2017 constitutional amendment

Abstract

Turkey changed its 1982 Constitution and adopted a presidential form of government in 2017. This constitutional amendment changed the approval of the budget radically. Along with that, debates may arise in terms of political responsibility for not approved the budget by the Parliament, how the budget will accepted when the president and majority of the Parliament are from different party, and there is not any mechanism being in classical presidential system as public account committee to enhance parliamentary supervision over the executive branch.

In this study,

- we deliberate the concept of  political power in representative democracy in terms of public decision-making and resource allocation process and then we analyze the existing political oversight role of Turkish Parliament over the public finance on the basis of  democratic legitimacy of public decision-making process and political accountability. 

- we focus on oversight role of Turkish Parliament over the public finance at the point of using "power of purse after the Constitutional Amendment adopted on April 16, 2017. Within the context of this analysis, the new constitutional structure of Parliament's budget approval and audit process in Turkish Parliament was evaluated.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Mustafa Biçer, Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi / Grand National Assembly of Turkey

Mr. BİÇER is a Deputy Director (Legislative Expert) at Grand National Assembly of Turkey- GNAT since 1997 (22 years). He graduated from Middle East Technical University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Political Science and Public Administration Department. Currently, he has a Ph.D. decree on public finance from Ankara University Department of Public Finance. His research interests are fiscal policy, public financial management system, public policy-making process and sectoral budgeting (Gender, Child, education vb.).

References

Atiyas, İ. ve Sayın Ş.,(1997), Siyasi Sorumluluk, Yönetsel Sorumluluk ve Bütçe Sistemi: Bir Yeniden Yapılanma Önerisine Doğru, İstanbul: TESEV Yayını, Boyut Matbaacılık.

Biçer, M., (2017), Türkiye’de Kurala Bağlı Maliye Politikası ve Bütçe Hakkı Temelinde Parlamentonun Etkinliği, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi.

CRT, (2018) Constitution of the Republic of Turkey, https://global.tbmm.gov.tr/docs/constitution_en.pdf.

Çağan, N., (1986), Anayasa Çerçevesinde Kamu Maliyesinin Parlamenter Kontrolü, Anayasa Yargısı, Cilt 2, Anayasa Mahkemesi Yayını, Ankara, pp. 199-224.

Erdoğan M., (2010) Anayasal Demokrasi, 8. Baskı, Siyasal Kitabevi.

Fabrizio S. and Ashoka M., (2006), Can Budget Institutions Counteract Political Indiscipline? International Monetary Fund WP/06/123, 2006.

Harfst, P. and Schnapp, K., (2003) Are Agents Able to Control their Principal’s Control Structures? An Empirical Attempt to Measure the Institutional Potential of Parliaments to Control their Executives”, ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Workshop 5: Institutional Theory: Issues of Measurement and Change, Edinburgh, March 28 – April 2, http://www.uni-lueneburg.de/fb2/soz/politik/seiten/team/dokumente/ECPR_ Edinburgh.pdf, (15.05.2010)

Hetzel, R., L., (1997) The Case for a Monetary Rule in a Constitutional Democracy, FRB Richmond Economic Quarterly, Vol. 83, No. 2, Spring, pp. 45-66.

Inter-Parliamentary Union, Parliament,(2004) The Budget and Gender Process: Handbook for Parliamentarians, No. 6. Available at: http://www.ipu.org/PDF/publications/budget_en.pdf (30.03.2017).

Mouffe C., (2008) Siyasetin Dönüşü, Çev. Fahri Bakırcı ve Ali Çolak, Epos Yayınları.

Musgrave A. R. and Musgrave P. B., (1989) Public Finance in Theory and Practice, 5th edition, McGraw-Hill Book Company.

O’connor J.,(1973) The Fiscal Crisis of the State, St. Martin Press, New York.

OECD/SIGMA (2010), The Administrative Capacity of The Turkish Grand National Assembly, SIGMA Peer Review Report, OECD- SIGMA.

Santiso, C., (2005) “Parliaments and Budgeting: Understanding the politics of the budget”, presented at the XVII Regional Seminar on Fiscal Policy of the United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America (ECLAC) in Santiago, Chile, on 24-27 January 2005 and at the Third Annual Meeting Euro-Latino-American Governance for Development Network of the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) in Hamburg, Germany, on 12-13 December 2005.

Sartori, G., (1996) Demokrasi Teorisine Geri Dönüş, Çev. Tuncer Karamustafaoğlu ve. Mehmet Turan, Yetkin Yayınevi.

Saybaşılı, K., (1992), İktisat, Siyaset, Devlet ve Türkiye, Bağlam Yayınevi.

Strøm, K., Wolfgang C. M., and Bergman, T., (eds.), (2003) Delegation And Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies, Oxford University Press.

Şaylan G., (1998) Demokrasi ve Demokrasi Düşüncesinin Gelişmesi, TODAİE İnsan Hakları Araştırma ve Derleme Merkezi, Ankara.

Şaylan G., (2008) Temsili Liberal Demokrasinin Önlenemez Krizi, 1. Baskı, İmge Kitapevi, Ankara.

TBMM (2008) Bütçe Sürecinde Parlamentonun Değişen Rolü, Uluslararası Sempozyum, Bildiri ve Makaleler, Afyonkarahisar 8 – 9 Ekim 2008.

Wolfgang, M., C., Bergman T., and Strøm, K., (2003) Parliamentary Democracy: Promise and Problems’. In Strøm vd., (ed.) Delegation And Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies, Oxford University Press, pp. 3-32.

Yıldıran Mustafa, Mahmure Eşgünoğlu and Süleyman Bolat (Ed) (2010), Maliye Politikasının Oluşturulmasında Parlamentonun Rolü, Uluslararası Sempozyum Bildiri ve Makaleler, 21–22 Ekim 2010, Sivas.

Yılmaz, H. H. and Biçer, M., Parlamentonun Bütçe Hakkını Etkin Kullanımının Yeni Bütçe Sistemi Çerçevesinde Değerlendirilmesi, 2010, Maliye Dergisi, Ocak-Haziran 2010, Sayı 158, pp. 201-225.

Downloads

Published

2019-07-13

How to Cite

Biçer, M. (2019). Evaluate the existing political oversight role of Turkish parliament over the public finance and in this context analyzed the new Turkish Presidential Government System. Journal of Human Sciences, 16(3), 746–761. https://doi.org/10.14687/jhs.v16i3.5666

Issue

Section

Public Finance