Analysis of outdoor and indoor performance and recovery values after anaerobic performance

Tülin  Atan; Şaban  Ünver; İzzet İslamoğlu; Gül  Çavuşoğlu

doi:10.14687/jhs.v17i3.6015

Authors

Tülin Atan Ondokuz Mayıs University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5660-8910
Şaban Ünver Ondokuz Mayıs University
İzzet İslamoğlu Ondokuz Mayıs University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3995-0567
Gül Çavuşoğlu Ondokuz Mayıs University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14687/jhs.v17i3.6015

Keywords:

Indoor-outdoor area, performance, recovery, anaerobic, lactic acid

Abstract

Research Problem/Aim: The objective of this study is to examine the anaerobic performance and recovery values after anaerobic performance in terms of outdoor or indoor performance.

Method: For this purpose, 30 male students studying at Faculty of Sports Sciences with an average age of 21.13±1.82 participated in the study voluntarily. Running-Based Anaerobic Sprint Test (RAST) was applied to the subjects twice with three days in-between as anaerobic exercise. Randomly chosen 15 subjects ran outdoors and the remaining 15 subjects ran indoors and their performance and recoveries were examined. Three days later, the subjects who ran outdoors three days ago ran indoors and those who ran indoors ran outdoors.

Findings: Anaerobic exercise performance was compared between indoor and outdoor area. Minimum power and average power values were found to be greater indoors than outdoors (p<0.05 ve p<0.01), Peak power, fatigue index (W/sec) and fatigue index (%) values were not found to differ between indoor and outdoor areas (p>0.05). Before the anaerobic run, the athletes’ resting lactic acid (LA) and heart rate (HR) values were taken, and then RAST test was applied. The subjects’ recoveries were monitored for 10 minutes after the test. HR measurements were recorded at every minute of the recovery. On the 1st, 5th and 10th minutes of recovery, the subjects’ blood LA levels were measured. No statistically significant difference was found between outdoor and indoor resting, 1st minute, 5th minute and 10th minute LA levels according to the results of statistical analyses (p>0.05). Resting and recovery HR values were also found not to differ between outdoor and indoor performance (p>0.05).

Conclusions: It was concluded that outdoor and indoor performance did not influence recovery up to 10 minutes after anaerobic exercise. As a conclusion, some anaerobic exercise performance was better indoors than outdoors. Recovery after an anaerobic exercise was not found to differ between indoors and outdoors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Tülin Atan, Ondokuz Mayıs University

Associate Professor, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Faculty of Yasar Dogu Sport Science

Şaban Ünver, Ondokuz Mayıs University

Dr., Ondokuz Mayıs University, Faculty of Yasar Dogu Sport Science

İzzet İslamoğlu, Ondokuz Mayıs University

Research Assistant, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Faculty of Yasar Dogu Sport Science

Gül Çavuşoğlu, Ondokuz Mayıs University

Assistant Professor, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Faculty of Yasar Dogu Sport Science

References

Akgul, M.S., & Cakmakcı, O. (2015). The effect of hydrotherapy on recovery of soccer players. Spormetre the journal of physical education and sport sciences, 13(2), 143-150.

Amelia, F., & Pablo, F. (2013). Differences in 200-m sprint running performance between outdoor and indoor venues. J Strength Cond Res, 27(1), 83-8.

Arabacı, R. (2019). Elite athlete training in the United States of America. Journal of Athletic Performance and Nutrition, 6(1), 12-28.

Aslan, A., Guvenc, A., Hazır, T., & Acıkada, C. (2011). Recovery dynamics following high intensity exercise in young soccer players. Hacettepe J. of Sport Sciences, 22(3), 93–103.

Atan, T., Kabadayı, M., Elioz, M., Cilhoroz, B.T., & Akyol, P. (2013). Effect of jogging and core training after supramaximal exercise on recovery. Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise, 15(1), 73-79.

Brooks, D., Solway, S., Weinacht, K., Wang, D., & Thomas, S. (2003). Investigated the performance between on an indoor and an outdoor 6-minute walk test. There was no significant effect of setting (indoors vs outdoors) on distance walked. Archives of Physical Medicine& Rehabilitation, 84(6), 873-876.

Gill, N.D., Beaven, C.M., & Cook, C. (2006). Effectiveness of post-match recovery strategies in rugby players. Br J Sports Med, 40, 260–263.

Green, S., & Dawson, B. (1993). Measurement of anaerobic capacities in humans. Reviev article, Sports Med, 15(5), 312-327.

Gullu, G. (2015). Interaction of indoor air quality and health in primary schools. Internal environment quality seminars, Teskon, 1-7.

Ingram, J., Dawson, B., Goodman, C., Wallman, K., & Beilby, J. (2009). Effect of water immersion methods on post-exercise recovery from simulated team sport exercise. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 12, 417–421.

Kafkas, A., Çınarlı, F., & Kafkas, M. (2018). The longitudinal development of endurance, sprint, agility, strength and jumping performance within college volleyball players. Journal of Athletic Performance and Nutrition, 5(2), 1-16.

Konarskı, J., & Strzelczyk, R. (2009). Characterıstıcs of dıfferences ın energy expendıture and heart rate durıng ındoor and outdoor fıeld hockey matches. Studies in Physıcal Culture and Tourısm, 16(2).

Lacharité-Lemieux, M., Brunelle, J.P., & Dionne, I.J. (2015). Adherence to exercise and affective responses: comparison between outdoor and indoor training. Menopause, 22(7), 731-740.

Lacharité-Lemieux, M., & Dionne, I.J. (2016). Physiological responses to ındoor versus outdoor training in postmenopausal women. J Aging Phys Act, 24(2), 275-83.

Medbo, J.I., & Sejersted, O.D. (1985). Acid-base and electrolyte balance after exhausting exercise in endurance trained and sprint trained subjects. Acta Physiol Scand, 125, 97-109.

Mitchell, R. (2013). Is physical activity in natural environments better for mental health than physical activity in otherenvironments? Soc Sci Med. 91, 130–134.

Nummela, A., Rusco, H., & Mero, A. (1994). EMG activities ground reaction forces during fatigued and nonfatigued sprinting. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 26(5), 605-609.

Nummela, A., Vuorimaa, T., & Rusco, H. (1992). Change in force production, blood lactate and EMG activity in the 400m sprint. J Sports Sci, 10, 217-228.

Pasek, M., Michalowska-Sawczyn, M., & Nowak-Zaleska, A. (2014). Changes in maximal aerobic fitness and students’ attitude towards physical effort during outdoor and indoor school lessons of Physical Education. Baltıc Journal of Health and Physical Activity, 6(1), 24-33.

Schmitt, N. M., Schmitt, J., & Doren, M. (2009). The role of physical activity in the prevention of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women-an update. Maturitas, 63, 34-38.

Sixt, S., Beer, S., Blüher, M., Korff, N., Peschel, T., Sonnabend, M., Teupser, D., Thiery J., Adams, V., Schuler, G., & Niebauer J. (2010). Long- but not short-term multifactorial ıntervention with focus on exercise training ımproves coronary endothelial dysfunction in diabetes mellitus type 2 and coronary artery disease. European Heart Journal, 31, 112–119.

Smith, M.F., Davison, R.C.R., Balmer, J., & Bird, S.R. (2001). Reliability of mean power recorded during ındoor and outdoor self-paced 40 km cycling time-trials. Int J Sports Med, 22(4), 270-274.

Turner, T. L., & Stevinson, C. (2017) Affective outcomes during and after high-intensity exercise in outdoor green and indoor gym settings. International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 27(2), 106-116.