Perception of masculinity in rural family structure
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14687/jhs.v18i1.6023Keywords:
Gender, gender roles, biological sex, masculinity, rural family structure, perceptionAbstract
Research Problem/aim: The objective of this study is to determine the perception of masculinity in rural family structure
Methods: This research is a descriptive and analytical study. The universe of the research, which was conducted between the dates of 14.11.2016 - 31.05.2017, is the people of Akşehir district of Konya Province. Individuals aged 18 and over (n=500), who participated voluntarily, were included in the research, particular attention was paid to acquire the written and verbal consents of the participants prior to the application.
Findings: Participants are between the ages of 18 to 65 and the median age is 27.57±10.22. Almost all of the women, at 92.9%, disagree with the "the man should decide how to use the household income" statement, while 38,7% of men support this statement, it can be seen that the provided responses change according to genders (p=.000). Both genders accept the "the man is the head of the household" statement, while 39.5% of women agree with this statement, at high rates, at 74.9%, men support this statement. While both genders think it is the man's duty to provide for the family, the support rate for this statement among male participants is significantly higher, at 71.2%, and statistical differences can be detected (p=.000). While the "male politicians are more successful" statement is accepted at higher rates, at 49.7%, among male participants, statistically, there are huge differences between genders (p=.000).
Conclusions: According to the research conducted, it is seen that traditional understanding weighs heavily, and the roles attributed to men and the perception of masculinity draw more attention. The fact that the research was conducted in a rural society where traditional understanding was dominant, substantially affected the results. The perspective of rural societies needs to change. Raising and increasing awareness on topics, such as gender roles, gender perception, and human rights with the health education method will be effective in changing the perceptions of men and women about one another.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Akgül-Gök, F. (2013). Reflection of gender perception of married men and women to family functions. Hacettepe University, Institute of Social Sciences Department of Social Work, Master's Thesis, Ankara.
Akın, A., Demirel, S. (2003). Concept of gender and its effects on health. Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Medicine Journal Public Health, 25(4), 73-82.
Altınova, H. H., Duyan, V. (2013). The validity and reliability of perception of gender scale. Society And Social Work, 24(2), 9-22.
Atış, F. (2010). Attıtudes of determıne 1st and 4th class of mıdwıfery/nursıng students' regardıng to gender roles. Çukurova University, Institute of Health Sciences, Midwifery Department Master's Thesis, Adana.
Aydın, E. (2010). University students’ perception on gender: Hacettepe university, Social Sciences Institute, Department of Sociology, Master’s Thesis, Ankara.
Beyazıt, U., Mağden, D. (2015). The examınaton between hypergender ıdeology and perceptıon of fatherhood role among male students attendıng to unıversıty. Journal of Social Sciences, 8(2), 207-229.
Bingöl, O. (2014). The fact of gender and womanhood in Turkey. KMU Journal of Social and Economical Research, 16 (Special Issue I), 108-114.
Burger, J.M. (2006). Personality. (Translated: İ.D. Erguvan Sarıoğlu). İstanbul: Kaknüs Publishing.
Dinç-Kahraman, S. (2010). Determination of the opinions of women against social gender ınequality. Dokuz Eylul University School of Nursing Electronics Journal, 3 (1), 30-35.
Ege University Faculty of Medicine Public Health Department. (2003). Gender roles and health services. http://halksagligi.med.ege.edu.tr/seminerler/200304/SaglikHizmetlerindeCinsiyetRolleri_AD.pdf. Date of access:15.12.2019.
Ersoy, E. (2009). Woman and man ıdentity in gender culture (example of malatya) Fırat University Journal Of Social Science, 19(2), 209-230.
Fazli-Khalaf, Z., Yun-Low, W., Ghorbani, B., Khoei, E.M. (2013). Perception of masculinity amongst young Malaysian men: a qualitative study of university students. BMC Public Health, 13:1062, 2-8.
Franzoi, S.L. (2003). Social Psychology. New York: Mc Grow-Hill Education.
Giddens, A. (2008). Sociology. Istanbul, Red Publications.
Kahraman, L., Kahraman, B., Ozansoy, N., Akıllı, H., Kekillioğlu, A., Özcan, A. (2014). Nevsehır Hacı Bektas Velı Unıversıty gender perceptıon research Turkish Studies. International Periodical For The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 9/2 Winter, 811-831.
KSGM. (2008). Gender equality national action plan (2008-2013). Ankara. http://kadininstatusu.aile.gov.tr/ulusal-eylem-planlari/toplumsal-cinsiyet-esitligiulusal-eylem-plani. Date of access:11.09.2019.
Moç, S. (2013). The role of traditional ıdentity in the formation of gender perception in university students. Iğdır University, Institute of Social Sciences, Department of Philosophy and Religious Sciences, Master Thesis. Iğdır.
Mohamud, A., Murphy, E. (2001). Reproductive Health Gender and Human Rights: The sexuality Connection. In. Washington.
Mora, N. (2005). Sexism reproduced in mass media and ıts reflection in society. International Journal of Human Sciences, 2(1), 1-7.
Moya, M., Expósito, F., Ruiz, J. (2000). Close relationships, gender, and career salience. Sex Roles, 42(9), 825-846.
Oktan, A. (2008). From the hegemonıc masculınıty to masculınıty crısıs ın turkısh cınema: yazı tura and the lımıts of masculınıty crısıs. Selçuk Communication, 5(2), 152-166.
Parashar, S., Dhar, S., Dhar, U. (2004). Perceptions of values: A study of future professionals. Journal of Human Values, 10(2), 143-152.
Pınar, G., Taşkın, L., Eroğlu, K. (200). The behaviours of the students in dormitory of Baskent University against sexual role patterns. Hacettepe University Faculty of Health Sciences Nursing Journal, 47–57.
Republic of Turkey Ministry of Family and Social Policies. (2016). Turkish Family Structure Research. Second Edition. Ankara: Uzerler Publishing.
Sancar, S. (2009). Masculinity: Impossible Power - Men in the Family, on the Market and on the Street. Metis Publishing, İstanbul.
Scott, J. (2007). Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis (Translated: Aykut Tunç Kılıç). İstanbul.
Seçgin, F., Tural, A. (2011). Attıtudes on gender roles of prımary school teacher candıdates. e-Journal of New World Sciences Academy Education Sciences, 6(4), 2446-2458.
Sezgin, D. (2015). Health and medıcalızatıon ın gender perspectıve. Journal of Sociological Research, 18(1), 153-186.
TÜİK. Women with Statistics, 2014. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=18619. Date of access:11.11.2019.
Vatandaş, C. (2007). Perception of gender and gender roles. Journal of Sociology Conferences, 35, 29-5.
Vefikuluçay-Yılmaz, D., Demirel, S., Taşkın, L., Eroğlu, K. (2007). Perception of and views on gender roles of senior students enrolled at Kafkas University. Hacettepe University School of Nursing Journal, 14(2), 12–27.
Vefikuluçay-Yılmaz, D., Zeyneloğlu, S., Kocaöz, S., Kısa, S., Taşkın, L., Eroğlu, K. (2009). Views on gender roles of university students. International Journal of Human Sciences, 6(1), 775-792.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Human Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors can retain copyright, while granting the journal right of first publication. Alternatively, authors can transfer copyright to the journal, which then permits authors non-commercial use of the work, including the right to place it in an open access archive. In addition, Creative Commons can be consulted for flexible copyright licenses.
©1999 Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.