Measuring flow experience in recreational participants: Scale development and validation
Rekreasyonel katılımcılarda akış deneyiminin ölçülmesi: Ölçek geliştirme ve doğrulama
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14687/jhs.v17i4.6105Keywords:
Flow, Flow Experience, Leisure, Recreation, Recreational Flow Experience, Akış, Akış Deneyimi, Serbest Zaman, Rekreasyon, Rekreasyonel Akış DeneyimiAbstract
The study aimed to develop a valid and reliable measurement tool for determining the recreational flow experience. For this purpose, an item pool consisting of 18 items was created. In line with expert opinions, items that were not suitable for the structure of the scale were removed from the scale. The 12-item form was first applied to 542 people (336 males and 206 females; age =23.39±3.44), who were selected by purposeful sampling method, in order to determine the scale structure and to create the items. Exploratory factor analysis was carried out with the data obtained through the SPSS 23.0 package program. As a result of the analysis, a single factor with 9 items was determined that explained 53.986% of the total variance. Then, in order to verify the validity of the scale, a questionnaire study was applied to a new group with a total of 150 people ( age =30.09±8.69), 108 men and 42 women. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed using the data obtained with the AMOS 23.0 package program. It was determined that the result of confirmatory factor analysis fit the model data well. When the results obtained in the evaluation of the measurement model were evaluated as a whole, the Recreational Flow Experience Scale (RFES) consisting of 9 items and a single factor was defined with sufficient validity and reliability. Finally, the theoretical and practical implications for the research were discussed.
Özet
Bu çalışmanın amacı rekreasyonel akış deneyiminin belirlenmesine ilişkin geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçüm aracı geliştirmektir. Bu amaçla 18 maddeden oluşan, bir madde havuzu oluşturulmuştur. Uzman görüşleri doğrultusunda ölçeğin yapısına uygun olmayan maddeler ölçekten çıkarılmıştır. Oluşturulan 12 maddelik formun ilk olarak ölçek yapısının belirlenmesi ve maddelerin oluşturulması amacıyla amaçsal örnekleme yöntemiyle seçilen 336 erkek, 206 kadın toplam 542 kişi ( yaş=23.39±3.44) üzerinde uygulanmıştır. Elde edilen verilerle SPSS 23.0 paket programı aracılığıyla açımlayıcı faktör analizi gerçekleştirilmiştir. Analiz sonucunda, toplam varyansın %53.986'sını açıklayan 9 maddeli tek faktör belirlenmiştir. Ardından ölçek geçerliliğin doğrulanması amacıyla 108 erkek, 42 kadın olmak üzere toplam 150 kişinin ( yaş=30.09±8.69) katılım sağladığı yeni bir gruba anket çalışması uygulanmıştır. Elde edilen verilerle AMOS 23.0 paket programı aracılığıyla doğrulayıcı faktör analizi gerçekleştirilmiştir. DFA sonucu model veriye iyi uyum sağladığı belirlenmiştir. Ölçüm modelinin değerlendirilmesinde elde edilen bulgular bir bütün halinde değerlendirildiğinde 9 madde ve tek faktörden oluşan Rekreasyonel Akış Deneyimi Ölçeği (RADÖ) yeterli geçerlik ve güvenirlik ile tanımlanmıştır. Son olarak araştırmaya ilişkin teorik ve pratik çıkarımlar tartışılmıştır.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Alanoglu, S., Isik, O., & Ayhan, C. (2020). The effect of regular recreational activities on adult women’s stress, happiness, and life satisfaction levels. Progress In Nutrıtıon, 22.
Alba, J.W., & Williams, E.F. (2013). Pleasure Principles: A Review of Research on Hedonic Consumption, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(1), 2-18
Altunışık, R., Coşkun, R., Bayraktaroğlu, S., & Yıldırım, E. (2010). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri: SPSS Uygulamalı. Sakarya Yayıncılık.
Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. The Guilford Press.
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2016). Sosyal bilimler için veri ve analizi el kitabı: istatistik, araştırma deseni, SPSS uygulamaları ve yorum. Pegem A Yayıncılık.
Chen, Z. Y. (2001). The study of elementary teachers' leisure participation, experience in leisure benefits, and work satisfaction in Taipei County. National Taiwan Normal University. ISBN: 089NTNU0571003.
Cheng, T. M., Hung, S. H., & Chen, M. T. (2016). The influence of leisure involvement on flow experience during hiking activity: Using psychological commitment as a mediate variable. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 21(1), 1-19.
Cho, H. (2020). Importance of leisure nostalgia on life satisfaction and leisure participation. The Service Industries Journal, 40(1-2), 90-109.
Choi, D. H., Kim, J., & Kim, S. H. (2007). ERP training with a web-based electronic learning system: The flow theory perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(3), 223-243.
Chung, J. W., Rhee, Y. C., Boyd, J., Choi, W. B., & Ha, J. P. (2020). The Effect of Leisure Participation on the Relationship between the Leisure Satisfaction and Perceived Stress: Perspective of US College Students. 한국체육과학회지, 29(4), 599-609.
Churchill, G. A. 1979. A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Construct. Journal of Marketing Research 16:64–73.
Collins, A. L., Sarkisian, N., & Winner, E. (2009). Flow and happiness in later life: An investigation into the role of daily and weekly flow experiences. Journal of happiness studies, 10(6), 703-719.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety: Experiencing flow in work and play. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1977). Beyond Boredom and Anxiety, second printing. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., Larson, R., & Prescott, S. (1977). The Ecology of Adolescent Activity and Experience. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 6, 281-294.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, I. (1988). Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & LeFevre, J. (1989). Optimal experience in work and leisure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 815–822.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: HarperCollins.
Dailey, L. (2004). Navigational web atmospherics: explaining the influence of restrictive navigation cues. Journal of Business Research, 57(7), 795-803.
Decloe, M. D., Kaczynski, A. T., & Havitz, M. E. (2009). Social participation, flow and situational involvement in recreational physical activity. Journal of Leisure Research, 41(1), 73-91.
Detmer, J. L. (2010). Distributions in Utilizing Leisure Skills And Positive experıences As A Component of Treatment Progress in Men Who Are Civilly Committed Sexual Offenders. Published doctoral dissertation. Capella University
Devellis, R. F. (2017). “Ölçek Geliştirme: Kuram ve Uygulamalar”. Çeviri editörü: Totan, T. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
Ekinci, N. E., & Özdilek, C. (2019). Investigation of University Students' Awareness of Recreational Activities. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 11(2).
Engeser, S., & Rheinberg, F. (2008). Flow, performance and moderators of challenge-skill balance. Motivation and Emotion, 32(3), 158-172.
Gao, L., & Bai, X. (2014). “Online consumer behaviour and its relationship to website atmospheric induced flow: Insights into online travel agencies in China.” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, C:21, No:4, s.653-665.
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2016). IBM SPSS statistics 23 step by step: A simple guide and reference (13th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Ghani, J. A., Supnick R., &Rooney P. (1991). The Experience of Flow in ComputerMediated and in Face-to-Face Groups. Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Information Systems, DeGross, J.I, I. Benbasat, G. DeSanctis, and C. M. Beath, Eds., New York, New York, December 16- 18.
Gumus, H., & Isik, O. (2018). The Relationship of Physical Activity Level, Leisure Motivation and Quality of Life in Candidate Teachers. International Journal of Progressive Education, 14(5), 22-32.
Gürbüz, B., Çimen, Z., & Aydın, İ. (2018). Serbest zaman ilgilenim ölçeği: türkçe formu geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Spormetre Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 16(4), 256-265.
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B. & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. NJ: Pearson Education.
Henson, R. K., & Roberts, J. K. (2006). Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(3), 393-416.
Heo, J., Lee, Y., McCormick, B. P., & Pedersen, P. M. (2010). Daily experience of serious leisure, flow and subjective well‐being of older adults. Leisure Studies, 29(2), 207–225.
Hsu, C. L., ve Lu, H. P. (2004) “Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience.” Information & Management, 41(7), 853-868.
Huang, Y. C., Backman, S. J., & Backman, K. F. (2012). Exploring the impacts of involvement and flow experiences in Second Life on people's travel intentions. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 3(1), 4-23.
Jackman, P. C., Dargue, E. J., Johnston, J. P., & Hawkins, R. M. (2020). Flow in youth sport, physical activity, and physical education: A systematic review. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 101852.
Jackson, S. A. (1992). Athletes in flow: A qualitative investigation of flow states in elite figure skaters. Journal of applied sport psychology, 4(2), 161-180.
Jang, K. S. (2016). Relationships Between Leisure Flow, Leisure Benefits, Life Satisfaction and Revisit Intention of College Student Customers in Ski Resort. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 16(9), 254-266.
Jin, S. (2011) “I feel present. Therefore, I experience flow: a structural equation modeling approach to flow and presence in video games”, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 55(1), 114–136.
Kara, F. M., Gürbüz, B., & Öncü, E. (2019). Work hard, play hard: Leisure satisfaction and work engagement among Turkish women. Work, 64(2), 177-185.
Kiili, K. (2005). “Content creation challenges and flow experience in educational games: The IT-Emperor case.” The Internet and Higher Education, 8(3), 183- 198.
Koç, M. C., & Demirel, M. (2020). The Relationship between Serious and Casual Leisure and Leisure Management and Its Education: A Research on Generation Y. African Educational Research Journal, 8(2), 210-220.
Korzaan, Milinda L. (2003), “Going With the Flow: Predicting Online Purchase Intentions”, Journal of Computer Information Systems, 43(4), 25–31
Kyle G.T., Absher J., Norman, W., Hammit, W., & Jodice, L. (2007). Modified involvement scale. Leisure Studies, 26(4), 398-427.
Kyriazos, T. A., Stalikas, A., Prassa, K., Chatzilia, V., Galanakis, M., & Flora, K. (2018). The flow short scale (FSS) dimensionality and What MIMIC shows on heterogeneity and invariance.
Leckey, P. J., & Mannell, R. C. (2000). Confidence in personality impressions of others in leisure and work contexts: The role of implicit theories of leisure as expressive behavior. Leisure/Loisir, 24, 279-298.
Leung, L. (2020). Exploring the relationship between smartphone activities, flow experience, and boredom in free time. Computers in Human Behavior, 103, 130-139.
Luna, D., Peracchio, L. A., & de Juan, M. D. (2003). “Flow in individual web sites: model estimation and cross-cultural validation.” Advances In Consumer Research, 30(30), 280-281.
Majnemer, A., Rohlicek, C., Dahan‐Oliel, N., Sahakian, S., Mazer, B., Maltais, D. B., & Schmitz, N. (2020). Participation in leisure activities in adolescents with congenital heart defects. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 62(8), 946-953.
Mannell, R. C., Zuzanek, J., & Larson, R. (1988). Leisure states and “flow” experiences: Testing perceived freedom and intrinsic motivation hypotheses. Journal of Leisure research, 20(4), 289-304.
Mäntymäki, M., Merikivi, J., & Islam, A. N. (2014). Young People Purchasing Virtual Goods in Virtual Worlds: The Role of User Experience and Social Context. In Digital Services and Information Intelligence. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Mardia, K. V. (1985). Mardia’s test of multinormality. In S. Kotz & N. L. Johnson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistical sciences, Vol. 5 (pp. 217–221). New York, NY: Wiley.
Marriott, K., Tower, J., & McDonald, K. (2020). Community Leisure and Recreation Planning. Routledge.
Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2009). Flow theory and research. Handbook of positive psychology, 195-206.
Nimrod, G., & Adoni, H. (2006). Leisure-styles and life satisfaction among recent retirees in Israel. Ageing and Society, 26, 607–630.
Novak, T. P., Hoffman, D. L., & Yung, Y. F. (2000). “Measuring the customer experience in online environments: A structural modeling approach.” Marketing science, 19(1), 22-42.
Omodei, M. M., & Wearing, A. J. (1990). Need satisfaction and involvement in personal projects: Toward an integrative model of subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 59(4), 762.
Osborne, J. W., & Fitzpatrick, D. C. (2012). Replication analysis in exploratory factor analysis: What it is and why it makes your analysis better. Practical assessment, research, and evaluation, 17(1), 15.
Özmaden, M. (2019). The Investigation of the Relationship between University Students' Leisure and Life Satisfaction Levels. International Journal of Progressive Education, 15(2), 91-103.
Panthi, M. (2020). Leisure activities and well-being in residential care: Voices of older Adults in New Zealand (Doctoral dissertation, University of Otago).
Pearce, J. M., Ainley, M., & Howard, S. (2005). The ebb and flow of online learning. Computers in human behavior, 21(5), 745-771.
Privette, G. & Bundrick C. M. (1987). Measurement of Experience: Construct and Content Validity of the Experience Questionnaire. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 65, 315-332.
Rheinberg, F., Vollmeyer, R., & Engeser, S. (2003). Measuring flow experiences. Diagnostik von Motivation und Selbstkonzept. Tests und Trends, 2, 261-279.
Shim, S. I., Forsythe, S., & Kwon, W. S. (2015). “Impact of Online Flow on Brand Experience and Loyalty.” Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 16(1), 56.
Stein, G. L., Kimiecik, J. C., Daniels, J., & Jackson, S. (1995). Psychological antecedents of flow in recreational sport. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(2), 125-135.
Stollberger, J., & Debus, M. E. (2020). Go with the flow, but keep it stable? The role of flow variability in the context of daily flow experiences and daily creative performance. Work & Stress, 34(4), 342-358.
Tabachnick, B. G., & L. S. Fidell. 2007. Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Tian, H. B., Qiu, Y. J., Lin, Y. Q., Zhou, W. T., & Fan, C. Y. (2020). The Role of Leisure Satisfaction in Serious Leisure and Subjective Well-Being: Evidence From Chinese Marathon Runners.
Tinsley H. E., & Tinslry D. J. (1986). A theory of the attributes, benefi ts, and causes of leisure experience. Leisure Sciences. 8(1), 1–45.
Trevino, L.K. ve Webster, J. (1992). “Flow in computer-mediated communication.” Communication Research , 19(5), 539–573.
Vila-Nova, F., Oliveira, R., & Cordovil, R. (2020). Participation in Leisure Activities by Portuguese Children With Cerebral Palsy. Perceptual and motor skills, 127(6), 1051-1067.
Voelkl, J. E., & Ellis, G. D. (1998). Measuring flow experiences in daily life: An examination of the items used to measure challenge and skill. Journal of Leisure Research, 30(3), 380-389.
Webster, J., Trevino, L. K., & Ryan, L. (1994). “The dimensionality and correlates of flow in human-computer interactions.” Computers in human behavior, 9(4), 411-426.
Wöran, B. & Arnberger, A. (2012). Exploring Relationships Between Recreation Specialization, Restorative Environments and Mountain Hikers’ Flow Experience. Leisure Sciences, 34(2), 95–114.
Yalçın, İ., & Ayhan, C. (2020). Sportif rekreasyonel etkinliklere katılan kadınlarda fiziksel görünüş mükemmeliyetçiliği ve psikolojik iyi oluşun öz güven üzerine etkisi. SPORMETRE Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 18(1), 205-212.
Yeh, Y. E. (2007). A study on the relationships among flow experience, leisure constraints, and recreation specialization, for golfers with flow experiences. Journal of Outdoor Recreation Study, 20(1), 69–94.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of Human Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors can retain copyright, while granting the journal right of first publication. Alternatively, authors can transfer copyright to the journal, which then permits authors non-commercial use of the work, including the right to place it in an open access archive. In addition, Creative Commons can be consulted for flexible copyright licenses.
©1999 Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.