The survival of the “weakest” among the fittest: A critical reading of Miss Julie (1889) in relation to social Darwinism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14687/jhs.v18i1.6140Keywords:
Gender roles, social Darwinism, victorian period, reader response criticismAbstract
The play Miss Julie is about the portrayal of the new image of feminist woman in the Victorian period. The playwright August Strindberg is mainly considered to be a misogynist as evidenced in his preface to Miss Julie, in which he defines miss Julie as man-hating and half woman with a “degenerate brain”. This representation of Miss Julie by a male author is likely to promote the idea that Strindberg presents the new ‘feminist’ woman as inferior and weak with a downfall in the end. However, the paper will dwell into the play by employing reader-response criticism to interpret the play to discover its multiple meanings rather than following the mainstream readings that rely on characteristics of the Victorian period. By employing a critical reading method, the paper will attempt to problematize social Darwinism in relation to gender roles as represented in the play, and by doing so it will challenge if not transform the social constructions of “weak women” that ideologically pertains today.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Andersen, M. L. (2006). Thinking about women: Sociological perspectives on Sex and Gender (7th ed.). Pearson and AB.
Barthes, R. (1977). Image, music, text. Fontana Press.
Bryson, C. (1998). Mary Astell: Defender of the "Disembodied Mind". Hypatia, 13(4), 40-62. Retrieved March 15, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3810502
Creamer, S. (2016). Slamming the door on patriarchy. The treatment of transgressive women in Henrik Ibsen’s works. Retrieved from https://esource.dbs.ie/handle/10788/2992
Darwin, C. (1871). The Descent of man and selection in relation to sex. John Murray.
Davari, H. (2015). A Marxist reading of Miss Julie. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 64, 109-118.
Davari, H. & Sadeghi, M. (2017). A dialectical reading of Strindberg’s Miss Julie. Journal of Humanistic & Social Studies, 8(2), 57-71.
Hawkins, M. (1997). Social Darwinism in European and American thought 1860-1945. Cambridge University Press.
Jain, S. (2015). Miss Julie: A psychoanalytic study. Journal of Transdisciplinary Studies, 8(2), 161-176.
Lerner, G. (1986). The creation of patriarchy. Oxford University Press.
Moi, T. (2002). Sexual/textual politics (2nd ed.). Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
Radek, R. (2008). From Medusa to Cleopatra. Retrieved November 15, 2020, from Women in Literature, www2.ivcc.edu/gen2002/greek_and_roman_women.htm.
Rebellato, D. (2010). Naturalism and Symbolism: Early Modernist practice. In M.B. Gale & J.F. Deeney (Eds.), The Routledge Drama Anthology and Sourcebook (3-163). Routledge.
Rogers, J. A. (1972). Darwinism and social Darwinism. Journal of the History of Ideas, 33(2), 265-280.
Shideler, R. (1997). Darwin, weak men, strong women and Ibsen’s pillars of society. Comparative Literature Studies, 34(3), 242-259.
Singh, A. D. (2014). Sexual, textual and traumatic subjectivity: August Strindberg representation of class and sexual conflict in Miss Julie. Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Science, 2(10), 18-20.
Spencer, H. (1873). The study of sociology. Henry S. King & Co.
Strindberg A. (1888a). Miss Julie. In M. B. Gale & J. F. Deeney (Eds.), The Routledge Drama Anthology and Sourcebook (51-67). Routledge.
Strindberg A. (1888b). Preface to Miss Julie. In M. B. Gale & J. F. Deeney (Eds.), The Routledge Drama Anthology and Sourcebook (138-146). Routledge.
Woolf, V. (1929). A Room of One’s Own. Renard Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Human Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors can retain copyright, while granting the journal right of first publication. Alternatively, authors can transfer copyright to the journal, which then permits authors non-commercial use of the work, including the right to place it in an open access archive. In addition, Creative Commons can be consulted for flexible copyright licenses.
©1999 Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
