Theory of religious markets and secularism: An analysis on Muslim-majority countries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14687/jhs.v20i26367Keywords:
rational choice, secularism, religious markets, impartial government, individual liberty, Muslim-majority countriesAbstract
Theory of religious markets is a field of study that employs the rational choice methodology to examine the effects of religious policies and regulations on religious beliefs and organizations. Theory of religious markets attributes the secularization trend in Western societies not to modernization but rather to the monopolization of religion and the eradication of competitive religious markets. In contrast to contemporary secularism theory, which excluded political analysis from sociology of religion, the theory of religious markets has reintroduced political analysis into sociology of religion and sparked a fruitful academic debate. By employing a supply-side approach instead of a demand-side approach, theory of religious markets has reintroduced secularization to the forefront of political science's principal topics. Specifically, it has reconnected it with the evolution of the impartial government and the notion of religious pluralism. This paper investigates how the debate between these two theories can contribute to the policies necessary for the institutionalization of pluralistic and liberal politics in Muslim-majority countries today. Due to its rational choice approach, the theory of religious markets makes significant contributions to the study of liberalization issues in Muslim-majority countries in the context of freedom of religion and conscience, apart from theological debates.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Berkes, N. (1964). The Development of Secularism in Turkey. Routledge.
Bruce S. (2017). An empirical critique of re-sacralisation. Analyse und Kritik, 39(1), 145-161.
Bruce, S. (2011). Secularization: in defence of an unfashionable theory. Oxford University Press.
Cesur, R., Mocan, N.H. (2013). Does secular education impact religiosity, electoral participation and the propensity to vote for Islamic parties? Evidence from an education reform in a Muslim country. Natıonal Bureau of Economıc Research, Working Paper 19769.
Finke, R. (1990). Religious deregulation: origins and consequences. Journal of Church and State, 32(3), 609–626.
Finke, R., Iannaccone, L. R. (1993). Supply-side explanations for religious change in America. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 527, 27–39.
Finke, R., Iannaccone, L.R. (2014). Religious decline in the 20th century West: testing alternative explanations, Public Choice, 159, 385–414
Gill, A. (2007). The political origins of religious liberty. Cambridge University Press.
Haac, O. (1994). The Correspondence of John Stuart Mill and Auguste Comte. Routledge.
Harris, J., Martin, R. R., Montminy, S., & Finke, R. (2019, February 10). Cross-National Socio-Economic and Religion Data, 2011.
Iannaccone, L. R. (1990). Religious practice: a human capital approach. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 29(3), 297–314.
Iannaccone, L. R., Stark R. (1994). A supply-side reinterpretation of the ‘secularization’ of Europe. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, March 33, 76 – 88.
Iannaccone, L. R., Finke, R.&Stark, R. (1997). Deregulating religion: the Economics of Church and State. Economic Enquiry. 35(2), p. 350-364.
Iannaccone, L. R. (1998). Introduction to the economics of religion. Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 1465-1495.
Iannaccone, L. R., Finke, R.&Stark, R. (1998). Rationality and the “religious mind. Economic Inquiry, 36(3), 373–389.
Kuru A.T. (2012). Secularism and State Policies Toward Religion: The United States, France, and Turkey. Cambridge.
Minkenberg, M. (2018). Oxford handbook of the radical right. J. Rydgren (Eds.) Religion and the radical right (366-393). Oxford University Press.
Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2004). Sacred and secular: religion and politics worldwide. Cambridge University Press.
Rachel, H., McCleary,M., Barro, R.J. (2006). Religion and political economy in an international panel. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 45(2), 149–175.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Human Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors can retain copyright, while granting the journal right of first publication. Alternatively, authors can transfer copyright to the journal, which then permits authors non-commercial use of the work, including the right to place it in an open access archive. In addition, Creative Commons can be consulted for flexible copyright licenses.
©1999 Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.