Examining question type and the timing of IRE pattern in elementary science classrooms
Keywords:
IRE, questioning, wait time, response time, evaluation time, primary science educationAbstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the relations among types of teacher questions, student responses, and the timing regarding questioning within science classroom discourse. Thirty one teachers consented to the study and their classrooms were videotaped during a 40-minute science lesson. Classroom discussions that followed an Initiation-Response-Evaluation (IRE) pattern were coded. It was found that about 65% of all teacher questions were short answer questions. Teacher wait-time, student response, and teacher evaluation time were significantly higher in long answer questions compared to short answer questions. Finally, there were positive correlations among these three variables. Detailed analysis results for short and long answer question types were also examined as a part of this study.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Arnold, D. S., Atwood, R. K., & Roger, V. M. (1974). Question and response levels and lapse time intervals. Journal of Experimental Education, 43(1), 11-15.
Baysen, E., & Baysen, F. (2010). Prospective teachers’ wait-times. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 5172-5176.
Boeck, M. A., & Hillenmeyer, G. P. (1973). Classroom interaction patterns during microteaching: Wait time as an instructional variable. Paperpresented at the Annual Meeting of theAmerican Research Association, New Orleans.
Brock, C. (1986). The effects of referential questions on ESL classroom discourse. TESOL Quarterly, 20(1), 47-59.
Chin, C. (2007). Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 815-843.
DeTure, L. R., & Miller, A. P. (1985). The effects of a written protocol model on teacher acquisition ofextended wait-time. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Science Teachers Association, Cincinnati, OH.
Daymon, C., & Holloway, I. (2011). Qualitative research methods in public relations and marketing communications(2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Edwin, R. G. (1999). Developing novice teachers’ oral-questioning skills. McGill Journal of Education, 34, 29-47.
Erdogan, I., & Campbell, T. (2008). Teacher questioning and interaction patterns in classrooms facilitated with differing levels of constructivist teaching practices. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1891-1914.
Fagan, E. R., Hassler, D. M., & Szabo, M. (1981). Evaluation of questioning strategies in language arts instruction. Research in the Teaching of English, 15, 267-273.
Gee, J. P., & Green, J. L. (1998). Discourse analysis, learning and social practice: A methodological study. Review of Research in Education, 23, 119-169.
Graesser, A. C., & Person, N. K. (1994). Question asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, 31(1), 104-137.
Hancock, B., Ockleford, E., &Windridge, K. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research. United Kingdom: The NIHR Research Design Service for the East Midlands/Yorkshire & the Humber
Haneda, M. (2005). Some functions of triadic dialogue in the classroom: Examples from L2 research. Canadian Modern Language Review, 62(2), 313-333.
Honea, M. J. (1982). Wait time as an instructional variable: An influence on teacher and student. Clearinghouse, 56(4), 167-170.
Jones, N. A. (1980). The effect of type and complexity of teacher questions. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh. DissertationAbstract International, 41(2), 529-A.
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science. Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Liu, Y. B. (2008). Teacher-student talk in Singapore Chinese language classroom: A case study of IRF. Asia-Pacific Journal of Education, 28(1), 87-102.
Matthiesen, E. A. (2006). Teacher questioning: Effect on student communication in middle school algebra mathematics classrooms. (Master’s thesis). Texas A&M University.
Mayer, M. J., & Patriarca, L. A. (2007). Behavioral scripts and instructional procedures for students with learning and behavioral problems. Preventing School Failure, 52(1), 3-12.
Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press.
Mercer, N. (1996). The quality of talk in children’s collaborative activity in the classroom. Learning and Instruction, 6(4), 359-377.
Molinari, L., Mameli, C., & Gnisci, A. (2012). A sequential analysis of classroom discourse in Italian primary schools: The many faces of the IRF pattern. British Journal of Educational Psychology, doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02071.x
Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. H. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Myhill, D. (2006). Talk, talk, talk: Teaching and learning in whole class discourse. Research Papers in Education, 21, 19-41.
Nassaji, H., & Wells, G. (2000). What’s the use of triadic dialogue? An investigation of teacher-student interaction. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 376-406.
Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1989). The construction zone: Working for cognitive change in school. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (1991). Instructional discourse, student engagement, and literature achievement. Research in the Teaching of English, 25(3), 261-290.
Reinsvold, L.A., & Cochran, K. F. (2012). Power dynamics and questioning in elementary science classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23, 745-768.
Riley, J. P. (1986). The effects of teachers’ wait-time and knowledge comprehension questioning on science achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(4), 335-342.
Rowe, M. B. (1974). Wait time and rewards as instructional variables, their influence in language, logic, and fate control: Part 1. Wait time. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 11(2), 81-94.
Rowe, M.B. (1978). Wait, wait, wait. . .School Science and Mathematics, 78(3), 207-216.
Scott, P. H., Mortimer, E. F., & Aguiar, O. G. (2006). The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons. Science Education, 90(4), 605-631.
Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Toward an analysis of discourse. The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stahl, R. J. (1994). Using think-time and wait-time skillfully in the classroom. ERIC Digest. ERIC Clearinghouse for Social Studies/Social Science Education. Bloomington, IN. ED370885.
Swift, J. N., & Gooding, C. T. (1983). Interaction of wait time feedback and questioning instruction on middle school science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(8), 721-730.
Tobin, K. (1986). Effects of teacher wait time on discourse characteristics in mathematics and language arts classes. American Educational Research Journal, 23(2), 191-200.
Tobin, K. (1987). The role of wait time in higher cognitive level learning. Review of Educational Research, 5(1), 69-95.
van Zee, E. H., Iwasyk, M., Kurose, A., Simpson, D., & Wild, J. (2001). Student and teacher questioning during conversations about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 159-190.
van Zee, E.H., & Minstrell, J. (1997). Using questioning to guide student thinking. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6, 229-271.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Wilen, W. (2001). Exploring myths about teacher questioning in the social studies classroom. Social Studies, 92(1), 26-32.
Wilen, W. (2004). Refuting misconceptions about classroom discussion. The Social Studies, 95(1), 33-40.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors can retain copyright, while granting the journal right of first publication. Alternatively, authors can transfer copyright to the journal, which then permits authors non-commercial use of the work, including the right to place it in an open access archive. In addition, Creative Commons can be consulted for flexible copyright licenses.
©1999 Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
